情景知觉中的信息界定：从主观预期到“惊奇”算法*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 情景信息加工是情景知觉研究领域内的核心问题。然而，不同的研究者对“情景信息”的界定并不相同。在过去80多年的时间里对情景信息的界定先后经历了研究者主观确定、观察者评估、基于情景物理特征的计算模拟等方法。Itti和Baldi等人通过比较先验概率和后验概率之间的差异，提出了“惊奇”理论。文章介绍了真实情景知觉研究中“惊奇”理论的应用及进展，并指出“惊奇”算法的拓展及界定、情景知觉过程中的注意转换与“惊奇”的关系，以及社会情景知觉中的“惊奇”应用可能是未来相关领域需要进一步探索的问题。

关键词: 情景知觉, 信息, 主观预期, 惊奇

Abstract: It is a key issue on how to process scene information in the high-level scene perception fields. However, the information definition varies from different researchers. During the past eight decades, the development of scene information definition experienced several approaches as researches' subjective affirmation, viewers' evaluation and computing simulations based on scene physics characteristic. Itti and Baldi(2005, 2009)compared the different distribution between the prior probability and posterior probability，and developed a model of surprise. This paper introduced the application of ″surprise″ to the scene perception field, and analyzed the development of the relevant research progress. Finally, it noted that the extension of surprise computation, the definition of surprise, attention switching during scene perception and application of surprise in complex social scenes that need to be further explored.

Key words: scene perception, information, subjective expectancy, surprise

中图分类号:

B842.2

康廷虎,张丰. 情景知觉中的信息界定：从主观预期到“惊奇”算法^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 826-833.

Kang Tinghu, Zhang Feng. The Definition of Information in the Scene Perception: From Subjective Expectancy to Surprise Arithmetic[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(6): 826-833.

参考文献

白学军, 康廷虎, 闫国利.(2008). 真实情景中刺激物识别的理论模型与研究回顾. 心理科学进展, 16(5), 679-686.
康廷虎, 白学军.(2013). 靶刺激变换与情景信息属性对真实情景再认的影响. 心理科学, 36(3), 558-565.
康廷虎, 白学军.(2008). 真实情景知觉中注视控制的研究进展. 西北师范大学学报(社会科学版), 45(4), 107-111.
康廷虎, 张丰.(2013-5-27). 用“惊奇值”计算场景所含信息. 中国社会科学报, B07.
刘立秋, 陆勇.(2007). Linda问题: “齐当别”抉择模型的解释. 心理科学进展, 15(5), 735-747.
田宏杰, 王福兴, 徐菲菲, 申继亮.(2010). 场景知觉中物体加工的背景效应. 心理科学进展, 18(6), 878-886.
王福兴, 田宏杰, 申继亮.(2009). 场景知觉及其研究范式. 心理科学进展, 17(2), 268–277.
Antes, J. R.(1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 62-70.
Baldi, P.(2002). A computational theory of surprise. In M. Blaum, P. G. Farrell and H. C. A. van Tilborg(eds.), Information, Coding, and Mathematics(pp. 1-25). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Baldi, P., & Itti, L.(2010). Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention. Neural Networks, 23, 649-666.
Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A.(2009).Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes. Vision Research, 49, 2992-3000.
Birmingham, E., & Kingstone, A.(2009). Human social attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1156(1), 118-140.
Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M.(2008). Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object-scene consistency. Visual Cognition, 16(2), 375-390.
Bulthoff, H. H., Gillner, S., & Mallot, H. A.,et al.(2005). Proceeding of 9th Tubingen Perception Conference. Knirsch-Verlag, Kirchentellinsfurt, Germany.
Buswell, G. T.(1935). How People Look at Pictures. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C.(2011). Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 890-896.
De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d'Ydewalle, G.(1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317-329.
Einhaeuser, W., Mundhenk, T. N., Baldi, P. F., Koch, C., & Itti, L.(2007). A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 1-13.
Evans, M.(1997). Bayesian inference procedures derived via the concept of relative surprise. Communications in Statistics, 26(5), 1125-1143.
Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P.(2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?. Journal of Vision, 7(1), 10, 1-29.
Fei-Fei, L., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P.(2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99(14), 8378-8383.
Fisk, J. E.(2002).Judgments under uncertainty: Representativeness or potential surprise?. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 431-449.
Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A.(1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271.
Henderson, J. M.(2007). Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 219-222.
Henderson, J. M.(2003).Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 485-498.
Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M.(2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. Van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill(Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain(pp. 537-562). Oxford: Elsevier.
Itti, L. & Baldi, P.(2005). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19, 547-554.
Itti, L., & Baldi, P.(2009). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research, 49(10), 1295-1306.
Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E.(1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(11), 1254-1259.
Jaynes, E. T.(2003). Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kanwisher, N. G.(1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
Konkle, T. & Oliva, A.(2012). A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron, 74(6), 1114-1124.
Land, M. F., & Hayhoe, M.(2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?. Vision Research, 41, 3559-3565.
Lejeune, H.(1998). Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time. Behavioural Processes, 44, 127-145.
Loftus, G. R. & Mackworth, N. H.(1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 565-572.
Mackworth, N. H., & Morandi, A. J.(1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(11), 547-552.
Mannan, S. K., Ruddock, K. H., & Wooding, D. S.(1995). Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. Spatial Vision, 9(3), 363-386.
Mannan, S. K., Ruddock, K. H, & Wooding, D. S.(1996).The relationship between the locations of spatial features and those of fixations made during visual examination of briefly presented images. Spatial Vision, 10(3), 165-188
Matsukura, M., Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M.(2009). Overt attentional prioritization of new objects and feature changes during real-world scene viewing. Visual Cognition, 17, 835-855.
Mundhenk, T. N., Einhauser, W., & Itti, L.(2009). Automatic computation of an image's statistical surprise predicts performance of human observers on a natural image detection task. Vision Research, 49, 1620-1637.
Rashed, C. A. A., Bagum, N., Khan, S., & Hasan, M.(2011).A model on factory information system(FIS). Review of General Management, 14(2), 139-150.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M.(1992).Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849-860.
Reeves, A., & Sperling, G.(1986). Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychological Review, 93(2), 180-206.
Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J, J.( 1997) To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373
Riby, D. M., & Hancock, P. J. B.(2008).Viewing it differently: Social scene perception in Williams syndrome and Autism. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2855-2860.
Rao, R. P. N., Zelinsky, G. J., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H.(2002). Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research, 42, 1447-1463.
Shackle, G. L. S.(1969). Decision, order and time in human affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teigen, K. H., & Keren, G.(2003). Surprises: Low probabilities or high contrasts?. Cognition, 87(2), 55-71.
Torralba, A., Oliva, A., & Castelhano, M. S., et al.(2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766-786.
, M. L., & Henderson J. M.(2011). Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: Evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1742-1753.
Weaver, W.(1948). Probability, rarity, interest and surprise. Scientific Monthly, 67(6), 390-392.
Zakay, D.(2000). Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing(a response to ‘switching or gating?’ by Lejeune). Behavioural Processes, 52, 63-69.

[1]	金花, 贾丽娜, 单金磊. 相关度对老年人错误信息持续影响效应的影响：死亡态度和健康焦虑的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 389-395.
[2]	贺荟中, 张云翔. 信息类型和位置对儿童不同时期面孔加工的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 741-748.
[3]	袁方舟, 喻亚玲, 朱璐瑶, 潘运, 乌云特娜, 七十三. 直觉和分析在不同信息获取与呈现方式下对多特征目标判断质量的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 17-23,112.
[4]	于永菊. 焦虑和抑郁对正负性注意偏向的影响：注意控制的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 121-127.
[5]	张聚媛, 许潇, 刘勤学. 信息框架及个体情绪诱发对大学生捐助行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 360-367.
[6]	张锦坤, 刘晓倩, 杨丽娴. 背景图相关度与知觉流畅性对意义材料学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 757-762.
[7]	王露, 万鹏, 任桂琴. 汉语口语词汇识别中声调、语境的作用：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 150-156.
[8]	汪招霞, 许磊, 刘华山, 陈京军, 龚勋. 模糊容忍性对网络信息搜索绩效的影响：信息迷航的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 164-169.
[9]	徐灿, 杨小虎, 汪玉霞, 张辉, 丁红卫, 刘畅. 语音型噪音对二语者汉语元音声调感知的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 22-30.
[10]	左恩玲, 张向葵, , 田金来, 赵悦彤. 不同亚型社会退缩幼儿在四种故事情境中的社会信息加工特点与差异^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 506-514.
[11]	魏玲, 连榕, 余宥依, 孙超. 自闭症谱系障碍儿童对不同类型社交场景注意模式的眼动差异^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 536-543.
[12]	王大伟, 乔秀青, 苏香, 徐平, 刘红丽, , 胡艺馨. 具体情绪与人格特质对决策信息加工过程的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 295-301.
[13]	何一粟,杨声伟,李洪玉. 散打运动员视觉信息加工的眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 755-759.
[14]	杨悦颖, 杨海波, 王晓琳, 舒婧, 王志强, 谢敬聃, 于生元. 人类疼痛表情研究进展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 551-557.
[15]	谢丽丽,徐慧芳,姜媛,方平. 情绪的确定性评价对信息加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 305-310.

情景知觉中的信息界定：从主观预期到“惊奇”算法^*

The Definition of Information in the Scene Perception: From Subjective Expectancy to Surprise Arithmetic

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价