大学生亲子互动问卷的编制及其与抑郁的关系

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 自编《大学生亲子互动问卷》，选取125名被试进行问卷初测，并采用探索性因素分析建立问卷的因子结构；运用编制好的亲子互动问卷和抑郁自评量表（SDS）对306名大学生进行纸笔测试。通过验证性因素分析考察《大学生亲子互动问卷》的结构，检验问卷的同质信度和分半信度，并运用回归分析考察亲子互动对抑郁的预测作用。结果显示《大学生亲子互动问卷》包含主动关怀、自我表露、家庭活动和经济交流四个维度共21道题目，项目载荷区间为0.46-0.78，解释率58.92%，问卷各维度内部一致性信度在0.71-0.89之间，分半信度在0.66-0.78之间，验证性因素分析拟合指数χ²/df=1.49，RMSEA=0.06，结构效度可接受。亲子互动与抑郁的相关分析显示大学生亲子互动总分及四个维度的得分与抑郁都存在显著负相关，进一步的回归分析显示自我表露与家庭活动两个维度是预测抑郁的主要变量。在大学生的亲子互动中，更多的自我表露和家庭活动与较低水平的抑郁相关联。

关键词: 亲子关系, 亲子互动, 抑郁

Abstract: The first aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the parent-child interaction questionnaire in college students, in which the preliminary survey was derived from 125 subjects, and the exploratory factor analysis was adopted in order to explore the factor structure of the questionnaire. 306 college students were employed for the new parent-child interaction questionnaire and self-rating depression scale (SDS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the structure validity of the questionnaire. Internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability of the questionnaire were then examined. The predictability that parent-child interaction predicts depression was explored via regression analysis. Results showed this 21-item questionnaire included factors of caring, self-disclosure, family activities and communication of economy. Factor load ranged from 0.46 to 0.78, with explain rate of 58.92%, Reliability and validity were acceptable, which included internal consistency reliability (ranges from 0.71 to 0.89), split-half reliability (ranges from 0.66 to 0.78), and fit indices in CFA(χ²/df=1.492, RMSEA=0.06). The four dimensions were all significantly connected with the score of depression. Self-disclosure and family activities were associated negatively with depression.

Key words: parent-child relationship, parent-child interaction, depression

中图分类号:

B849

王宇昊, 刘惠军, 戴必兵. 大学生亲子互动问卷的编制及其与抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 702-708.

WANG Yuhao, LIU Huijun, DAI Bibing. The Development of the Questionnaire of College Students' Parent-Child Interaction and its Relationship with Depression[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(5): 702-708.

参考文献

陈健芷, 刘昭阳, 刘勇. (2013). 初中生受欺负现状及其与亲子依恋和同伴关系的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(5), 795-799.
陈宛玉, 周姗姗. (2015). 青少年的亲子关系特征及影响因素研究综述. 当代教育实践与教学研究, (6), 194-195.
池丽萍. (2013). 大学新生亲子沟通质量与“信任圈”的关系. 心理与行为研究, 11(5), 648-653.
高慧英, 王春红. (2013). 焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度. 中国保健营养(下旬刊), (9), 4955-4956.
顾思梦, 杜文东. (2014). 大学生亲子依恋影响抑郁症状的研究进展. 中国学校卫生, 35(4), 633-636.
郭海英, 朱婉灵, 朱倩, 朱茂玲, 左培颖, 林丹华. (2014). 亲子沟通与农村青少年幸福感的关系: 基本心理需要满足的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 129-136.
何文广, 宋广文. (2005). 初中生亲子冲突事件问卷的编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19(2), 112-115.
黄时华,蔡枫霞, 刘佩玲, 张卫, 龚文进. (2015). 初中生亲子关系和学校适应: 情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(1), 171-173, 177.
孔金旺,梁修云, 孟仙, 刘晶, 王礼桂. (2011). 父母关系及亲子沟通对初中生心理健康状况的影响. 中国学校卫生, 32(1), 53-54.
李金珍, 王文忠, 施建农. (2003). 积极心理学: 一种新的研究方向. 心理科学进展, 11(3), 321-327.
梁宗保,张光珍, 邓慧华, 宋媛, 郑文明, 孙铃. (2013). 从婚姻关系到亲子关系: 父母情绪表达的中介作用. 心理学报, 45(12), 1355-1367.
申继亮,周丽清, 佟雁, 张金颖. (2003). 亲子支持和孝顺期待对老年人孤独感的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 11(3), 167-169.
王春芳, 蔡则环, 徐清. (1986). 抑郁自评量表—SDS对1340例正常人评定分析. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 12(5), 267-268.
王征宇, 迟玉芬. (1984). 抑郁自评量表(SDS). 上海精神医学, 26(2), 73-74.
吴继霞,郭小川, 黄希庭, 李世娟. (2011). 中学生亲子关系问卷编制. 西南大学学报: 社会科学版, 37(4), 39-44.
吴明隆. (2009). 结构方程模型—AMOS的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
《心理科学》编辑部. (2014). 心理科学研究50题. 心理科学, 37(5), 1030-1038.
徐东, 张学立, 李献云, 牛雅娟, 张艳萍, 王绍礼,…许永臣. (2012). 社会心理干预对自杀未遂者的效果. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(1), 24-29.
叶子, 庞丽娟. (1999). 论儿童亲子关系、同伴关系和师生关系的相互关系. 心理发展与教育, 15(4), 50-53.
张锦涛,刘勤学, 邓林园, 方晓义, 刘朝莹, 兰菁. (2011). 青少年亲子关系与网络成瘾: 孤独感的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 641-647.
赵金霞, 朱彩琴. (2011). 亲子依恋与儿童焦虑的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(5), 636-638.
朱皕. (2005). 近50年来发展心理学生态化研究的回顾与前瞻. 心理科学, 28(4), 922-925.
Baumeister,R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Besharat, M. A., Issazadegan, A., Etemadinia, M., Golssanamlou, S., &Abdolmanafi, A.(2014). Risk factors associated with depressive symptoms among undergraduate students. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 21-26.
Blatt, S. J., & Homann, E. (1992). Parent-child interaction in the etiology of dependent and self-critical depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 12(1), 47-91.
Cheung,C. S. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2011). Parents' involvement in children's learning in the United States and China: Implications for children's academic and emotional adjustment. Child Development, 82(3), 932-950.
Djundeva, M., Mills, M., Wittek, R., & Steverink, N. (2015). Receiving instrumental support in late parent-child relationships and parental depression. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(6), 981-994.
Eisenberg, M. E.,Sieving, R. E., Bearinger, L. H., Swain, C., &Resnick, M. D.(2006). Parents' communication with adolescents about sexual behavior: A missed opportunity for prevention? Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 35(6), 893-902.
Eskin, M.,Akyol, A., Çelik, E. Y., &Gültekin, B. K. (2013). Social problem-solving, perceived stress, depression and life-satisfaction in patients suffering from tension type and migraine headaches. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 337-343.
Jaremka, L. M., Lindgren, M. E., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2013). Synergistic relationships among stress, depression, and troubled relationships: Insights from psychoneuroimmunology. Depression & Anxiety, 30(4), 288-296.
Jin, J., & Hu, J. S.(2014). Cognitive reactions after social exclusion. Advances in Psychology, 4(1), 96-103.
Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Critchfield, K. L., & Staab, E. M. (2017). Informative disagreements: Associations between relationship distress, depression, and discrepancy in interpersonal perception within couples. Family Process, 56(2), 459-475.
Lantz, J. (2001). Depression, existential family therapy, and Viktor Frankl's dimensional ontology. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(1), 19-32.
Leach, P. (2007). Book Reviews: Child care and child development. Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. The Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 48(9), 959.
Liao, J., Head, J., Kumari, M., Stansfeld, S., Kivimaki, M., Singh-Manoux, A., &Brunner, E. J. (2014). Editor's choice: Negative aspects of close relationships as risk factors for cognitive aging. American Journal of Epidemiology, 180(11), 1118-1125.
Nederhof, E., Ormel, J., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2014). Mismatch or cumulative stress: The pathway to depression is conditional on attention style. Psychological Science, 25(3), 684-692.
O'Malley, C. J.,Blankemeyer, M., Walker, K. K., &Dellmann-Jenkins, M.(2007). Children's reported communication with their parents about war. Journal of Family Issues, 28(12), 1639-1662.
Over, H. (2016). The origins of belonging: Social motivation in infants and young children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 371(1686), 20150072.
Tselebis, A., Moulou, A., Ilias, I., & Bratis, D. (2006). Depression, family support and alexithymia in patients with bronchial asthma. Annals of General Psychiatry, 5(1), S128.
Wu, S. J.,Zhu, X., Zhang, Y. L., Liang, J., Liu, X. F., Yang, Y. B., … Miao, D. M. (2012). A new psychological intervention: “512 Psychological Intervention Model” used for military rescuers in Wenchuan Earthquake in China. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47(7), 1111-1119.
Yousefi, Z., & Ahmadimehr, Z. (2014). Predicting adolescence depression: Resiliency and family factors. SOP Transactions on Psychology, 1, 1-10.

[1]	张鹏程, 李喜, 桑宇杰, 陈宁. 神经质人格对中小学生抑郁的影响：班级环境的跨层调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 637-643.
[2]	罗芮, 赵云燕, 何然, 王耘, 陈福美. 二孩家庭父母偏爱的特点及其与青少年抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 657-664.
[3]	余益兵, 于家伟, 李艳如, 杜宜展. 农村留守儿童领悟家庭支持、朋友支持与抑郁的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 472-478.
[4]	丁倩, 罗星雨. 歧视知觉对留守青少年攻击行为的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 346-352.
[5]	张馨予, 孙琦, 周广东, 李冰. 大学生进食障碍症状的潜在剖面分析及其与抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 73-79.
[6]	朱莹莹, 马晓晴, 唐卓仪, 杨敏齐. 睡眠类型对大学生抑郁的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 657-664,694.
[7]	陈兰双, 宋惠敏, 董静, 赵欢, 张镇. 老年大学学员组织融入度和抑郁症状的关系及其机制探索[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 706-713.
[8]	陈佩儀, 陈瑜, 杨雪岭. 中庸思维对大学生抑郁症状的影响机制：消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 571-576.
[9]	颜志强, 李珊. 共情和抑郁的关系：同伴关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 424-430.
[10]	姚文玉, 张雯, 刘影, 张思敏, 丁雪辰, 徐刚敏. 儿童抑郁水平与学业成绩的发展轨迹：基于平行潜变量增长模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 223-229.
[11]	彭丽仪, 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 詹林. 儿童期受虐经历对大学生抑郁的影响：神经质人格和MAOA基因rs3027407多态性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 230-236.
[12]	李甜甜, 顾吉有, 徐鹤文. 父亲抑郁对幼儿问题行为的影响：教养效能感和教养方式的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 66-73.
[13]	卢富荣, 宋煜静, 刘路培, 方选智. 父母冲突对儿童青少年抑郁情绪的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 770-776.
[14]	纪凌开, 刘华山, 李晨璐. 温水煮青蛙：专业认同对大学生抑郁的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 833-838.
[15]	李昂, 张景焕. 亲子关系和移情对青少年社会创造力的预测：友谊质量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 496-502.