三维情境中类别空间关系加工的影响因素研究——观察角度、刺激位置及背景属性

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 734-742.

三维情境中类别空间关系加工的影响因素研究——观察角度、刺激位置及背景属性

张媛¹, 钟瑶¹, 杨柳娜¹, 刘登攀²

1. 陕西师范大学心理学院, 陕西省行为与认知神经科学重点实验室, 西安 710062;
2. 国防大学政治学院, 西安 710068

收稿日期:2015-04-18 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-28
通讯作者: 张媛,E-mail:zhangyuan920@snnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（GK201402055）

The Factors in Judgment of Categorical Spatial Relation in Three-dimensional Spatial——About Observation Angle, Similar of Background, Position of Targets

ZHANG Yuan¹, ZHONG Yao¹, YANG Liuna¹, LIU Dengpan²

1. School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Key Laboratory for Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience of Shaanxi Province, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062;
2. Political Academy, National Defence University of People's Liberation Army, Xi'an 710068

Received:2015-04-18 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究采用目标-类别范式，通过两个实验探讨三维情境中观察角度、靶刺激所在物体颜色和形状的相似性、靶刺激空间距离及离开水平方向的角度对类别空间关系加工的影响。研究结果表明，在不同的观察角度，获得物体的信息越多，类别空间关系判断越容易；背景颜色相似性高类别空间关系加工的效率较低；两个靶刺激之间的距离对于类别空间判断影响较小；靶刺激观察角度为竖直和水平方向时，类别空间关系判断的效率较低。

关键词: 类别空间关系, 视觉空间关系, 观察角度, 背景相似性

Abstract: This study examined affect of the observation angle, the color and form similarity of the object target stimulus on, the perspective of the beeline two stimulus on and the level, and the distance between two stimulus in three-dimensional spatial category relations judgment missions by using the target-category paradigm. Two experiments were designed to test the score of subjects under different conditions in three-dimensional spatial category relations judgment missions, adopting category-target paradigm. The study suggested that due to the change observation angle in three-dimensional spatial category relations judgment, the more information subjects got, the more efficiency of judgment of categorical spatial relations was. The similar background was difficult to judgment with more mistakes and more time to react: the more similar of the color of backdrop, the more difficult to judgment. Judgment of categorical spatial relations was also affected by perspective of targets (the perspective of the beeline two stimuli on and the horizontal line): when the perspective of targets was 0°or 90°, it cost subjects more time to judge with more errors.

Key words: categorical spatial relation, visual space attention, observation Angle, similarity of background

中图分类号:

B842.2

张媛, 钟瑶, 杨柳娜, 刘登攀. 三维情境中类别空间关系加工的影响因素研究——观察角度、刺激位置及背景属性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 734-742.

ZHANG Yuan, ZHONG Yao, YANG Liuna, LIU Dengpan. The Factors in Judgment of Categorical Spatial Relation in Three-dimensional Spatial——About Observation Angle, Similar of Background, Position of Targets[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 734-742.

参考文献

陈文锋, 焦书兰. (2005). 选择性注意中的客体与空间因素. 心理科学, 28(2), 395-397.
Marr, D. (1988). 视觉计算理论 (姚国正, 刘磊, 汪云九译). 北京: 科学出版社.
游旭群. (2002). 类别与数量空间关系识别加工中的练习效应研究. 心理科学, 25(4), 418-421.
游旭群, 杨治良. (2002). 视觉空间关系识别中的认知加工特性. 心理学报, 34(4), 344-350.
游旭群, 张媛, 刘登攀. (2008). 仿真场景下类别空间关系判断中的注意分配. 心理学报, 40(7), 759-765.
张媛, 刘登攀, 游旭群. (2008). 目标类别空间关系判断任务中的提示效应. 心理科学, 31(3), 540-545.
Baker, D. P., Chabris, C. F., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1999). Encoding categorical and coordinate spatial relations without input-output correlations: New simulation models. Cognitive Science, 23(1), 33-51.
Baumann, O., Chan, E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2012). Distinct neural networks underlie encoding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations during active navigation. NeuroImage, 60(3), 1630-1637.
Cowin E. L., Hellige J. B. (1994). Categorical versus coordinate spatial processing: Effects of blurring and hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(2), 156-164.
Laeng, B., & Peters, M. (1995). Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left- and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 33(4), 421-439.
Hellige, J. B., & Michimata, C. (1989). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory & Cognition, 17(6), 770-776.
Kosslyn, S. M., Chabris, C. F., Marsolek, C. J., & Koenig, O. (1992). Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: Computational analyses and computer simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 562-577.
Laeng, B., Chabris, C. F., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Asymmetries in encoding spatial relations. In K. Hugdahl & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The asymmetrical brain (pp. 303-339). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Niebauer, C. L. (2001). A possible connection between categorical and coordinate spatial relation representations. Brain and Cognition, 47(3), 434-445.
Postma, A., Winkel, J., Tuiten, A., & van Honk, J. (1999). Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in human spatial memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 24(2), 175-192
Saneyoshi, A., & Michimata, C. (2009). Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 181-186.
Trojano, L., Dario, G., Linden, D. E. J., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., Cirillo, S., … Di Salle, F. (2002). Coordinate and categorical judgements in spatial imagery. An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40(10), 1666-1674.
van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Schölvinck, M. L., Kenemans, J. L., & Postma, A. (2006). Divergence of categorical and coordinate spatial processing assessed with ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 44(9), 1547-1559.

[1]	任彧, 郝芳. 人际距离和情绪知觉对利他选择的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 321-326.
[2]	张锋, 赵国祥, 孙真真. 控制感对聋哑人的情绪图片时距知觉的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 593-598.
[3]	金桂春, 王有智, 王丽. Simon效应对空间-数字反应编码联合效应的抑制作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 489-494.
[4]	康廷虎,张丰. 情景知觉中的信息界定：从主观预期到“惊奇”算法^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 826-833.
[5]	顾吉有,吕勇. 选择性注意和分配性注意对多感觉整合的不同影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 202-206.
[6]	郝芳, 刘长江. 颜色对基于时间的视觉选择的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 205-210.
[7]	崔诣晨,王沛. 内隐人格观对他人知觉的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 44-51.
[8]	陈琳，钟罗金，李悠，莫雷. 特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 577-582.
[9]	颜志雄，燕良轼，范伟，丁道群，邹霞. 身体清洁启动后道德纯洁词加工的时间特征:来自ERPs的证据^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 609-615.
[10]	曹晓华，王本驰，家晓余，李锋盈. 惩罚对学习时间分配中决策与绩效的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 462-468.
[11]	王庭照,杨鹃. 不同工作记忆负荷下聋人与听力正常人注意捕获的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 601-606.
[12]	陈顺森,白学军. 自闭症幼儿对多重竞争条件下熟悉面孔的注意偏向[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 640-647.
[13]	周铁民,沈德立,白学军. 复合刺激潜意识知觉的属性分离[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(2): 94-98.
[14]	尹华站,黄希庭. 时间复制任务中的计时中断效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(3): 161-165.