执行意向在不同认知负荷下对前瞻记忆的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 743-749.

执行意向在不同认知负荷下对前瞻记忆的影响

干加裙¹, 郭盈秀¹, 郭云飞², 张哲¹, 陈幼贞¹

1. 福建师范大学心理学院, 福州 350007;
2. 西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715

收稿日期:2015-12-16 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-28
通讯作者: 陈幼贞,Email:chenyouzhen08@163.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社科规划基金项目（12YJA190002）

The Effect of Implementation Intentions on Prospective Memory Under Different Cognitive Load

GAN Jiaqun¹, GUO Yingxiu¹, GUO Yunfei², ZHANG Zhe¹, CHEN Youzhen¹

1. School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

Received:2015-12-16 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 实验一采用3（编码方式：标准、执行意向、提取练习）×2（认知负荷：高、低）混合实验设计，考察编码方式和认知负荷对基于事件的前瞻记忆的影响。结果表明在高认知负荷条件下，提取练习编码效果好于执行意向编码。实验二采用2（编码方式：执行意向确定形成、提取练习）×2（认知负荷：高、低）混合实验设计，并通过之后的纸笔测验加强联结程度，结果和实验一相同。结果表明执行意向编码对前瞻记忆的影响受认知负荷的限制。

关键词: 编码方式, 认知负荷, 执行意向, 提取练习, 前瞻记忆

Abstract: Using N-back task paradigm as ongoing experiment in Experiment 1, we adapted 3 (encoding styles: standard, implementation intentions, retrieval practice)×2 (cognitive load: high and low) mixed design to investigate the effect of encoding style and cognitive load on the event-based prospective memory performance. The results showed that the retrieval practice encoding was better than implementation intentions encoding under high cognitive load conditions. In Experiment 2, using 2(encoding styles: implementation intentions determination form, retrieval practice)×2(cognitive load: high and low) mixed design, and through the paper and pencil test to enhance the degree of connection between PM intention with intented action, the results replicated the central finding of Experiment 1.The results revealed that the effect of implementation intentions encoding on the prospective was limited by the cognitive load.

Key words: encoding style, cognitive load, implementation intention, retrieval practice, prospective memory

中图分类号:

B842.1

干加裙, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 张哲, 陈幼贞. 执行意向在不同认知负荷下对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 743-749.

GAN Jiaqun, GUO Yingxiu, GUO Yunfei, ZHANG Zhe, CHEN Youzhen. The Effect of Implementation Intentions on Prospective Memory Under Different Cognitive Load[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 743-749.

参考文献

郭云飞, 干加裙, 张哲, 黄婷红, 陈幼贞. (2016). 编码方式、认知负荷和线索数量对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理科学, 39(5), 1058-1063.
胡小勇, 郭永玉. (2013). 执行意向对目标达成的促进及其作用过程. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 282-289.
张明, 陈骐. (2002). 记忆提取研究的新进展. 心理科学进展, 10(2), 133-146.
周爱保, 马小凤, 李晶, 崔丹. (2013). 提取练习在记忆保持与迁移中的优势效应: 基于认知负荷理论的解释. 心理学报, 45(8), 849-859.
Boywitt, C. D., Rummel, J., & Meiser, T. (2015). Commission errors of active intentions: The roles of aging, cognitive load, and practice. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(5), 560-576.
Brewer, G. A., & Marsh, R. L. (2010). On the role of episodic future simulation in encoding of prospective memories. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(2), 81-88.
Cohen, A. L., Bayer, U. C., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Self-regulatory strategy and executive control: Implementation intentions modulate task switching and Simon task performance. Psychological Research, 72(1), 12-26.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717-726.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.
Karpicke, J. D., & Smith, M. A. (2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 17-29.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7), S127-S144.
McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Butler, K. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 716-724.
McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. (2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition, 38(2), 221-232.
McFarland, C. P., & Glisky, E. L. (2011). Implementation intentions and prospective memory among older adults: An investigation of the role of frontal lobe function. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18(6), 633-652.
McFarland, C., & Glisky, E. (2012). Implementation intentions and imagery: Individual and combined effects on prospective memory among young adults. Memory & Cognition, 40(1), 62-69.
Zimmermann, T. D., & Meier, B. (2010). The effect of implementation intentions on prospective memory performance across the lifespan. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 645-658.

[1]	江黛苔, 段亚杰, 严帅, 付思文, 刘伟. 事件性前瞻记忆的自我参照效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 312-318.
[2]	赵婷婷, 杨晓梦, 张洋, 王燕青, 谢和平, 王福兴. 多媒体学习中线索原则是否存在经验逆转效应？——来自两项元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 22-29.
[3]	刘红, 褚铮, 李缓缓, 赵笑梅. 自我损耗对基于时间前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 446-451,459.
[4]	孙崇勇, 刘丽丽, 高春阳. 翻转教学法对高中生认知负荷及学习成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 369-375.
[5]	干加裙, 张曼曼, 胡锦慧, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 执行意向影响事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 53-59.
[6]	龚少英, 韩雨丝, 王祯, 徐升, 刘小先. 基于计算机的反馈复杂性和先前知识对学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 765-772.
[7]	张冬梅, 路海东. 文本学习中运用先行组织者策略的知识反转效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 83-90.
[8]	张锦坤, 刘晓倩, 杨丽娴. 背景图相关度与知觉流畅性对意义材料学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 757-762.
[9]	马小凤, 王斌强, 周爱保. 提取练习的发展特点：8-9岁儿童与成人的比较[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 484-489,533.
[10]	胡炜宇, 齐冰. 提示促进时间性前瞻记忆：内、外部控制的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 188-194.
[11]	龚少英, 张盼盼, 上官晨雨. 学习者控制和任务难度对多媒体学习的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 335-342.
[12]	郭丰波, 韦义平, 高宇, 王益文,. 背景任务对前瞻记忆策略加工的影响：一项ERPs研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 75-82.
[13]	孙崇勇. 英语多媒体学习中言语关联手势对认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 633-639.
[14]	李芳, 张海燕, 田锐, 丁亮. 前瞻记忆的情绪一致性反转效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 198-204.
[15]	赵杨,王林,时勘. 微博网民情绪敏感度、行为意向与执行意向的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 99-105.