仁慈领导对员工建言的影响：自我预防和自我提升的双重路径

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 839-845.

仁慈领导对员工建言的影响：自我预防和自我提升的双重路径

徐悦, 段锦云, 李成艳

苏州大学心理学系, 教育部人文社科重点研究基地-苏州大学中国特色城镇化研究中心, 苏州 215123

收稿日期:2015-10-23 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-28
通讯作者: 段锦云,E-mail:mgjyduan@hotmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“团队建言氛围结构及其形成机制” （项目编号：71372180）

The Impact of Benevolent Leadership on Employee Voice: Dual Path of Self-prevention and Self-improvement

XU Yue, DUAN Jinyun, LI Chengyan

Department of Psychology, Key Research Institute of Education Ministry-Center for Chinese Urbanization Studies, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China

Received:2015-10-23 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于调节聚焦理论的思想，通过对407名员工与其直接上级配对取样，探讨中国组织情境下仁慈领导对员工建言的影响及其作用机制和边界条件。研究结果显示，仁慈领导对员工的建言行为起到促进作用，且以员工心理安全感和个人地位感为中介；除此之外，员工对领导高权力的感知会弱化仁慈领导的正向作用，即员工感知到的领导权力水平越高，仁慈领导对员工建言行为的促进作用越弱，员工的心理安全感和个人地位感在“仁慈领导-建言行为”间的中介效应也越弱。

关键词: 仁慈领导, 员工建言, 心理安全感, 个人地位感, 领导权力感知

Abstract: Based on Regulatory Focus Theory, we conducted a survey towards 407 staff and their immediate superiors, we explored the relationship between benevolent leadership and employee voice as well as the mediation effect of employee psychological safety and sense of personal status under the Chinese organization situation. What's more, the boundary influence of leader power was also investigated. The data analysis results showed that the benevolent leadership positively related to employee voice behavior and this relationship was based on employees' psychological safety and sense of personal status for a mediation role. Besides, the moderated mediation results showed that sense of leader power could weaken the positive effect of benevolent leadership that while employee felt more about leaders' power, the mediation effect of psychological safety or sense of personal status was weaker between benevolent leadership and their voice behavior. At last future directions and limitations are discussed as well.

Key words: benevolent leadership, employee voice behavior, psychological safety, sense of personal status, sense of leader power

中图分类号:

B849

徐悦, 段锦云, 李成艳. 仁慈领导对员工建言的影响：自我预防和自我提升的双重路径[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 839-845.

XU Yue, DUAN Jinyun, LI Chengyan. The Impact of Benevolent Leadership on Employee Voice: Dual Path of Self-prevention and Self-improvement[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 839-845.

参考文献

段锦云. (2012). 家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响: 心理安全感的中介机制. 管理评论, 24(10), 109-116.
段锦云, 黄彩云. (2013). 个人权力感对进谏行为的影响机制: 权力认知的视角. 心理学报, 45(2), 217-230.
段锦云, 张晨, 田晓明. (2016). 员工建言行为的发生机制: 来自领导的影响. 中国人力资源开发, (5), 16-26.
樊景立, 郑伯埙. (2000). 华人组织的家长式领导: 一项文化观点的分析. 本土心理学研究, (13), 127-180.
李超平, 孟慧, 时勘. (2007). 变革型领导、家长式领导、PM理论与领导有效性关系的比较研究. 心理科学, 30(6), 1477-1481.
梁建. (2014). 道德领导与员工建言: 一个调节-中介模型的构建与检验. 心理学报, 46(2), 252-264.
沈伊默, 周婉茹, 魏丽华, 张庆林. (2017). 仁慈领导与员工创新行为: 内部人身份感知的中介作用和领导-部属交换关系差异化的调节作用. 心理学报, 49(8), 1100-1112.
吴维库, 王未, 刘军, 吴隆增. (2012). 辱虐管理、心理安全感知与员工建言. 管理学报, 9(1), 57-63.
张曼, 颜士梅. (2009). 下属感知领导权力的前因及过程分析. 中国人力资源开发, (3), 10-13.
郑伯埙. (2003). 华人组织行为研究的方向. 应用心理研究, 20, 19-24.
郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 樊景立. (2000). 家长式领导量表: 三元模式的建构与测量. 本土心理学研究, (14), 3-64.
郑晓涛, 柯江林, 石金涛, 郑兴山. (2008). 中国背景下员工沉默的测量以及信任对其的影响. 心理学报, 40(2), 219-227.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2012). 变革型领导对下属进谏行为的影响: 组织心理所有权与传统性的作用. 心理学报, 44(3), 388-399.
周建涛, 廖建桥. (2012). 权力距离导向与员工建言: 组织地位感知的影响. 管理科学, 25(1), 35-44.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511-536.
Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 23-57.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Chan, S. C., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization‐based self‐esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128.
Chan, S. C. H., & Mak, W. M. (2012). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2), 285-301.
Chan, A. W. H., & Cheung, H. Y. (2008). Common cultural relationships in corporate governance across developed and emerging financial markets. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 225-245.
Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2011). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796-819.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.
Fast, N. J., & Chen, S. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1406-1413.
Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1013-1034.
Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders' power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 30-44.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229.
Korman, A. K. (2001). Self-enhancement and self-protection: Toward a theory of work motivation. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 121-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liu, W., Zhu, R. H., & Yang, Y. K. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of applied Psychology, 83(2), 150-163.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1189-1203.
van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
Walumbwa, F. O, & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275-1286.
Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121.
Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25-36.