提示促进时间性前瞻记忆：内、外部控制的作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过操纵背景任务的认知负荷与提示所在的时段位置，考察提示能否通过影响个体对时间性前瞻记忆的认知控制来促进其任务表现。结果发现提示显著提高了前瞻任务的正确率。内部控制方面，高认知负荷下10分钟处提示显著提高了前瞻干扰量；外部控制方面，高、低认知负荷下6分钟和10分钟处提示均显著增加了时钟查看次数。这表明提示能够通过提高个体的内部和外部控制水平促进前瞻任务的表现，但其影响效果受到认知负荷和提示位置等因素的调节。

关键词: 时间性前瞻记忆, 提示, 内部控制, 外部控制

Abstract: The present study adopted a 4 between-subject (no reminder & 2 min reminder & 6 min reminder & 10 min reminder)×2 within-subject (high cognitive load & low cognitive load) mixed design to investigate the effect of reminders on time-based prospective memory (TBPM). The results showed:1) TBPM task performance:reminders improved PM accuracy. 2) internal control:the interaction between reminder and cognitive load was significant, the costs were greater for the 10min reminder condition compared with the no reminder condition under high cognitive demand. 3) external control:A main effect of reminder condition indicated that participants in the 10min reminder condition and the 6 min reminder condition checked the clock more frequently than participants in the no reminder condition. To conclude, reminders can improve the task performance of the TBPM by increasing individuals' internal and external control of the TBPM task, but the effect is regulated by factors such as cognitive load and reminder condition.

Key words: time-based prospective memory, reminders, internal control, external control

中图分类号:

B842.3

胡炜宇, 齐冰. 提示促进时间性前瞻记忆：内、外部控制的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 188-194.

HU Weiyu, QI Bing. Reminders Facilitate the Time-Based Prospective Memory Task: Internalizing Versus Externalizing Control[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(2): 188-194.

参考文献

陈幼贞, 黄希庭, 袁宏. (2010). 一种混合型前瞻记忆的加工机制. 心理学报, 42, 1040-1049.
郭云飞, 干加裙, 张哲, 黄婷红, 陈幼贞. (2016). 编码方式、认知负荷和线索数量对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理科学, 39, 1058-1063.
王丽娟, 于战宇. (2015). 认知方式与线索提示对学龄儿童基于事件前瞻记忆的影响. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 45, 177-186.
王永跃, 葛众列, 王健. (2010). 不同难度背景条件下前瞻记忆任务的实验研究. 心理科学, 33, 612-615.
赵晋全, 杨治良. (2002). 前瞻记忆提取的自动加工、策略加工和控制加工. 心理科学, 25, 523-526.
Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2016). Physical load affects duration judgments:A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 165, 43.
Cherkaoui, M., & Gilbert, S. J. (2017). Strategic use of reminders in an 'intention offloading' task:Do individuals with autism spectrum conditions compensate for memory difficulties? Neuropsychologia, 97, 140-151.
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 345-360.
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., Clark-Foos, A., & Meeks, J. T. (2007). Learning is impaired by activated intentions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 101-106.
Cook, G. I., Meeks, J. T., Clark-Foos, A., Merritt, P. S., & Marsh, R. L. (2014). The role of interruptions and contextual associations in delayed-execute prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 91-103.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal agingand prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., & Cunfer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory:Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory:Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 14, 286-290.
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 430-444.
Huang, T., Loft, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2014). Internalizing versus externalizing control:Different ways to perform a time-based prospective memory Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1064-1071.
Jäger, T., & Kliegel, M. (2008). Time-based and event-based prospective memory across adulthood:Underlying mechanisms and differential costs on the ongoing task. The Journal of General Psychology, 135, 4-22.
Kliegel, M., & Jäger, T. (2007). The effects of age and cue-action reminders on event-based prospective memory performance in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 22, 33-46.
Kvavilashvili, L., & Fisher, L. (2007). Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 136, 112-132.
Loft, S., Kearney, R., & Remington, R. (2008). Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation? Memory & Cognition, 36, 139-148.
Mahan, S., Rous, R., & Adlam, A. (2017). Systematic review of neuropsychological rehabilitation for prospective memory deficits as a consequence of acquired brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23, 254-265.
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1037-1045.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval:A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 127-144.
McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. (2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition, 38, 221-232.
McNerney, M. W., & West, R. (2007). An imperfect relationship between prospective memory and the prospective interference effect. Memory & Cognition, 35, 275-282.
Oriani, M., Moniz-Cook, E., Binetti, G., Zanieri, G., Frisoni, G. B., Geroldi, C., … Zanetti, O. (2003). An electronic memory aid to support prospective memory in patients in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease:A pilot study. Aging and Mental Health, 7, 22-27.
Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893-912.
Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C., & McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory:Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734-746.
Taatgen, N. A., van Rijn, H., & Anderson, J. (2007). An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation:The role of cognition, attention, and learning. Psychological Review, 114, 577-598.
Waldum, E. R., & Sahakyan, L. (2013). A role for memory in prospective timing informs timing in prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 142, 809-826.
Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (1996). The role of attention in time estimation processes. Advances in Psychology, 115, 143-164.
Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (2004). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments:An executive-control perspective. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 64, 319-328.

[1]	刘红, 褚铮, 李缓缓, 赵笑梅. 自我损耗对基于时间前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 446-451,459.
[2]	李士一, 白学军, 王雨薇, 郑蕾, 孙弘进. 二维场景旋转下的背景提示效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 289-294.
[3]	王艳梅, 曾于秦. 线索—提示任务下情绪对注意转换的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 456-460.
[4]	隋雪,纪雅婷,陈欣,任桂琴. 正负效价面部表情图片加工的差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 7-12.
[5]	王娜；刘湍丽；沈德立. 概念提示和音乐经验对音乐张力感知发展的影响[J]. , 2012, 10(4): 278-283.
[6]	潘运；沈德立；王杰3. 不同注意提示线索条件下汉字数字加工的SNARC效应[J]. , 2009, 7(1): 21-26.
[7]	邢强,莫雷. 渐减提示法呈现样例对学习迁移的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(4): 274-277.