智力增长观对高威胁下自我评价的作用效果：呈现顺序和自尊的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 195-201.

智力增长观对高威胁下自我评价的作用效果：呈现顺序和自尊的影响

胡心怡, 陈英和

北京交通大学学生心理素质教育中心, 北京 100044;
北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875

收稿日期:2017-04-20 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2018-04-19
通讯作者: 陈英和,E-mail:chenyinghe@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大项目（14ZDB160）

The Effect of Incremental Belief about Intelligence on Self Evaluation in High Threat Condition: the Influence of Order and Self-Esteem

HU Xinyi, CHEN Yinghe

The Psychological Quality Education Centre, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044;
Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received:2017-04-20 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-04-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以207名大学生为被试，采用两个研究考察在高威胁情境下，智力增长观对不同自尊水平的个体完成能力提升练习后自我评价的影响。结果表明：（1）当智力增长观在威胁情境前呈现时，在高威胁情境下，完成智力增长观写作任务的被试在练习后的内部自我评价显著高于控制组，并且智力增长观能够显著正向预测低自尊被试的内部自我评价。（2）当智力增长观在威胁情境后呈现时，在高威胁情境下，智力增长观能够显著正向预测高自尊被试的内部自我评价。（3）智力增长观任务对高威胁情境下被试完成练习后的外部自我评价无显著影响。

关键词: 智力增长观, 自我评价, 高威胁情境, 呈现顺序, 自尊

Abstract: The present study, based on incremental belief about intelligence, aimed at exploring the effect of a belief in improvable intelligence on self evaluation of participants with different self-esteem. Participants were 207 undergraduate students. The results indicated as follows:1)when incremental belief about intelligence was introduced prior to threat condition, participants who were intervened by the belief significantly exhibited higher intrinsic self evaluation after finishing practice about given ability in high threat condition. Particularly, the intervention significantly predicted low self-esteem participants' intrinsic self evaluation in high threat condition positively. 2)when incremental belief about intelligence was introduced after threat condition, the intervention significantly predicted high self-esteem participants' intrinsic self evaluation in high threat condition positively. 3)incremental belief about intelligence had no influence on participants' extrinsic self evaluation in high threat condition after finishing practice.

Key words: incremental belief about intelligence, self evaluation, high threat condition, order, self-esteem

中图分类号:

B848.2

胡心怡, 陈英和. 智力增长观对高威胁下自我评价的作用效果：呈现顺序和自尊的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 195-201.

HU Xinyi, CHEN Yinghe. The Effect of Incremental Belief about Intelligence on Self Evaluation in High Threat Condition: the Influence of Order and Self-Esteem[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(2): 195-201.

参考文献

田录梅. (2006). Rosenberg(1965)自尊量表中文版的美中不足. 心理学探新, 26(2), 88-91.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition:A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter:A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655-701.
Critcher, C. R., Dunning, D., & Armor, D. A. (2010). When self-affirmations reduce defensiveness:Timing is key. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 947-959.
Cury F., Da Fonseca D., Zahn I., & Elliot A. (2008). Implicit theories and IQ test performance:A sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 783-791.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2010). When you accept me for me:The relational benefits of intrinsic affirmations from one's relationship partner. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1439-1453.
Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102(2), 284-304.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance:The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641-666.
Nicholls, J. G., & Miller, A. T. (1984). Reasoning about the ability of self and others:A developmental study. Child Development, 55, 1990-1999.
Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation:Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 599-612.
Park, D., & Kim, S. (2015). Time to move on? When entity theorists perform better than incremental theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 736-748.
Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). "It's ok-Not everyone can be good at math":Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731-737.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image (vol. 11, pp. 326). Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Schimel, J., Arndt, J., Banko, K. M., & Cook, A. (2004). Not all self-affirmations were created equal:The cognitive and social benefits of affirming the intrinsic (vs. extrinsic) self. Social Cognition, 22(1), 75-99.
Snyder, K. E., Malin, J. L., Dent, A. L., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The message matters:The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 230-241.
Spencer, S. J., Josephs, R. A., & Steele, C. M. (1993). Low self-esteem:The uphill struggle for self-integrity. In Baumeister, R. F. (ed.), Self-esteem (pp. 21-36). Boston, MA:Springer.
Stone, J., Wiegand, A. W., Cooper, J., & Aronson, E. (1997). When exemplification fails:Hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 54-65.
vanDellen, M. R., Campbell, W. K., Hoyle, R. H., & Bradfield, E. K. (2011). Compensating, resisting, and breaking:A meta-analytic examination of reactions to self-esteem threat. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 51-74.
Vohs, K. D., Park, J. K., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2013). Self-affirmation can enable goal disengagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 14-27.

[1]	黄杰, 朱丹, 周丽敏, 刘望. 核心自我评价的代际传递：父母支持和子女基本心理需要满足的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 515-521.
[2]	李永占. 情绪智力在身体自尊与进食障碍倾向间的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 570-576.
[3]	孙洪蕊, 柳铭心, 张兴利, 周晨浩, 刁雅欣, 包乃丽. 父亲和母亲自主支持的特点及其与青少年社会适应的关系：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 375-381.
[4]	姚崇, 惠琪, 王媛, 席海莎, 雒朝梁. 公费师范教师社会支持与职业倦怠的关系探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 816-823.
[5]	王欣竹, 邹何辉, 郝娜, 黄瑶, 吴琴, 崔丽莹. 抑制还是补偿？尴尬情绪对初中生合作倾向和行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 549-555.
[6]	彭顺, 胡祥恩. 大学生压力与疲劳的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 563-570.
[7]	刘啸莳. 母亲受教育水平和青少年学业自尊的关系：母亲教养方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 59-65.
[8]	刘昕, 刘晓雯. 负性生活事件与儿童反应性攻击性之间的关系：一个有多重中介变量的结构方程模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 82-88.
[9]	卢富荣, 宋煜静, 刘路培, 方选智. 父母冲突对儿童青少年抑郁情绪的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 770-776.
[10]	刘国庆, 陈维, 程刚, 潘运, 赵守盈. 父母教养方式对大学生嫉妒的影响：自尊与生活满意度的链式中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 376-382.
[11]	麻书滔, 陈少华, 麻彦坤. 未成年犯童年期受虐待程度与攻击行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 220-226.
[12]	田宏杰. 完美主义高标准对大学生拖延行为的影响：链式中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 668-674.
[13]	罗杰, 陈维, 杨桂芳, 吴丹萍, 刘拓. 大学生主动性人格对其拖延行为的影响：核心自我评价的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 692-698.
[14]	郭春涵. 大学生自我中心与主观幸福感的关系：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 546-552.
[15]	毋嫘, 赵伯尧, 展昭, 范碧娟, 赵亚萍. 父母正念养育对青少年抑郁的影响及其机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 561-568.