差序式领导对员工建言行为的影响：组织承诺与内部人身份认知的多重中介效应

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 408-414,432.

差序式领导对员工建言行为的影响：组织承诺与内部人身份认知的多重中介效应

李晓玉^1,2, 赵申苒², 高昂², 高冬东²

1. 河南大学哲学与公共管理学院, 开封 475004;
2. 河南大学心理与行为研究所, 开封 475004

收稿日期:2018-07-16 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-06-10
通讯作者: 高冬东,E-mail:gaodd@henu.edu.cn
基金资助:
河南省高等学校重点科研项目（18A190001）、河南省科技发展计划（162400410220）

The Impact of Differential Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Multiple Mediation Model of Organizational Commitment and Perceived Insider Status

LI Xiaoyu^1,2, ZHAO Shenran², GAO Ang², GAO Dongdong²

1. School of Philosophy and Public Adminstration, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004;
2. Institute of Psychology & Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004

Received:2018-07-16 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 差序式领导是一种根植于中国文化背景的领导理论，由于其贴近中国组织情境，具有较强的本土契合性而引起关注。通过问卷调查法收集有效问卷511份，构建了差序式领导对员工建言行为的多重中介模型，考察了组织承诺和内部人身份认知的中介效应。结果发现：差序式领导对建言行为具有正向预测作用；组织承诺、内部人身份认知在差序式领导和建言行为之间分别起到部分中介作用；当组织承诺和内部人身份认知以并式组合加入时，两者起完全中介作用且两者之间的间接效应没有显著差异。

关键词: 差序式领导, 建言行为, 组织承诺, 内部人身份认知

Abstract: Differential leadership is a kind of leadership theory based on Chinese culture background. It is widely attracting attention because it is closer to the Chinese organizational situation and have cultural adaptability. This research got 511 valid questionnaires and explored the impact of differential leadership on employee voice behavior. The results showed that the differential leadership has a positive impact on voice behavior. Organizational commitment and perceived insider status play the partial mediated role between differential leadership and voice behavior. When considering organizational commitment and perceived insider status at the same time, they play the completely mediated role between differential leadership and voice behavior, furthermore, the mediating effect of organizational commitment and perceived insider status was not significant differences.

Key words: differential leadership, employee voice behavior, organizational commitment, perceived insider status

中图分类号:

B849

李晓玉, 赵申苒, 高昂, 高冬东. 差序式领导对员工建言行为的影响：组织承诺与内部人身份认知的多重中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 408-414,432.

LI Xiaoyu, ZHAO Shenran, GAO Ang, GAO Dongdong. The Impact of Differential Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Multiple Mediation Model of Organizational Commitment and Perceived Insider Status[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 408-414,432.

参考文献

段锦云, 张晨, 徐悦. (2016). 员工建言行为的人口统计特征元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(10), 1568-1582
段锦云, 钟建安. (2012). 工作满意感与建言行为的关系探索:组织承诺的缓冲影响. 管理工程学报, 26(1), 170-174, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2012.01.025
费孝通. (1948). 乡土中国. 北京:三联书店.
高良谋, 王磊. (2013). 偏私的领导风格是否有效?——基于差序式领导的文化适应性分析与理论延展. 经济管理, 35(4), 183-194
姜定宇, 张菀真. (2010). 华人差序式领导与部属效能. 本土心理学研究, (33), 109-177
姜定宇, 郑伯埙. (2014). 华人差序式领导的本质与影响历程. 本土心理学研究, (42), 285-357
马戎. (2007). "差序格局"——中国传统社会结构和中国人行为的解读. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 44(2), 131-142
田在兰, 黄培伦. (2013). 差序式领导理论的发展脉络及与其他领导行为的对比研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 34(4), 150-157
屠兴勇, 张琪, 王泽英, 何欣. (2017). 信任氛围、内部人身份认知与员工角色内绩效:中介的调节效应. 心理学报, 49(1), 83-93
王磊. (2013). 差序式领导有效性的理论与实证研究(博士学位论文). 东北财经大学, 大连.
汪林, 储小平, 黄嘉欣, 陈戈. (2010). 与高层领导的关系对经理人"谏言"的影响机制——来自本土家族企业的经验证据. 管理世界, (5), 108-117, 140
王磊, 杜贝贝. (2017). 中国本土情境下的差序式领导与创造力研究——团队建言氛围的跨层次作用. 东北财经大学学报, (3), 25-33, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-4096.2017.03.004
王萍, 王琳. (2017). 个人主义/集体主义取向对差序式领导行为有效性的影响机理. 人类工效学, 23(2), 23-29
尹俊, 王辉, 黄鸣鹏. (2012). 授权赋能领导行为对员工内部人身份感知的影响:基于组织的自尊的调节作用. 心理学报, 44(10), 1371-1382
袁凌, 李静, 李健. (2016). 差序式领导对员工创新行为的影响-领导创新期望的调节作用. 科学进步与对策, 33(10), 110-115
赵红丹, 汤先萍. (2015). 内部人身份认知研究述评. 外国经济与管理, 37(4), 56-65
郑伯埙. (1995). 差序格局与华人组织行为. 本土心理学研究, (3), 142-219
郑伯埙. (2004). 华人文化与组织领导:由现象描述到理论验证. 本土心理学研究, (22), 195-251
郑建君. (2014). 基层公务员组织承诺和建言行为的关系:以领导成员关系为调节变量的模型检验. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 37(5), 137-144
Cheng, B. S., Shieh, P. Y., & Chou, L. F. (2002). The principal's leadership, leader-member exchange quality, and the teacher's extra-role behavior:The effects of transformational and paternalistic leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17, 105-161.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of Leader-Member Exchange theory:Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827.
Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77-88, doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009.
Guerrero, S., Sylvestre, J., & Muresanu, D. (2013). Pro-diversity practices and perceived insider status. Cross Cultural Management, 20(1), 5-19, doi:10.1108/13527601311296229.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty:Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
LePine, J. A., & van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853.
Li, J. S., Wu, L. Z., Liu, D., Kwan, H. K., & Liu, J. (2014). Insiders maintain voice:A psychological safety model of organizational politics. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3), 853-874, doi:10.1007/s10490-013-9371-7.
Liang, J., Farh, J. L. (2008). Promotive and prohibitive voice behavior in organizations:A two-wave longitudinal examination. Paper presented at the Third Conference of the International Association for Chinese Management Research, Guangzhou, China.
Martin, J. (1981). Relative deprivation:A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 53-107, Vol. 3). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89, doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations:Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538.
Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance:A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 257-266, doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379.
Stamper, C. L., & Masterson, S. S. (2002). Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), 875-894, doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379.
Zhao, H. D., Kessel, M., & Kratzer, J. (2014). Supervisor-subordinate relationship, differentiation, and employee creativity:A self-categorization perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(3), 165-184, doi:10.1002/jocb.46.

[1]	张建卫, 周洁, 李海红, 王健. 自我职业生涯管理对组织承诺的作用机制：链式中介及调节效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 422-432.
[2]	沈翔鹰, 穆桂斌. 家长式领导与员工建言行为：组织认同的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 841-846.
[3]	务凯,李永鑫,刘霞. 家长式领导与员工建言行为：领导-成员交换的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 384-389.
[4]	时勘, 高利苹, 曲如杰. 员工谏言的影响作用探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 217-222.
[5]	杜林致, 徐建华, 王楠. 图书馆普通员工胜任力模型及其有效性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 229-234.
[6]	胡青, 孙宏伟. 高校校长变革型领导行为的测量及其对教师组织承诺的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 251-257.