工作记忆容量与走神频率关系的元分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用元分析的方法探讨工作记忆容量与走神频率之间的关系，以及影响二者关系的调节因素。通过文献检索，共获得17项研究和73个独立效应量，包含了10834名被试。元分析结果发现：（1）整体上工作记忆容量与走神频率之间呈负相关。（2）使用不同的测量工具所测的工作记忆容量与走神频率的相关有显著差异，同时使用操作广度、阅读广度和对称广度进行测量时，工作记忆容量与走神频率之间的相关最高。（3）走神频率的测量方式对工作记忆容量与走神频率的关系有显著影响，使用探针方式时二者相关最高。（4）任务难度对工作记忆容量与走神频率关系的调节作用并不显著。

关键词: 工作记忆容量, 走神频率, 元分析, 调节效应

Abstract: A meta-analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between working memory capacity and mind wandering frequency and the factors affecting this relationship. Through literature retrieval, 17 cases and 73 independent effect sizes together with 10834 participants which met the inclusion criteria of meta-analysis were selected. Heterogeneity test indicated that random effects model was appropriate for the meta-analysis. The result of funnel plot and Egger's intercept illustrated that there was no publication bias. The main-effect test findings demonstrated that working memory capacity was significantly associated with mind wandering frequency. The moderator analysis revealed that the measurement tools of working memory capacity and mind wandering frequency moderated the relationship between working memory capacity and mind wandering frequency but the task difficulty did not.

Key words: working memory capacity, mind wandering frequency, meta-analysis, moderate effect

中图分类号:

B842.1

吴国来, 张婧婧, 任方圆, 杨晶晶, 酒艳红. 工作记忆容量与走神频率关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 461-471.

WU Guolai, ZHANG Jingjing, REN Fangyuan, YANG Jingjing, JIU Yanhong. Association Between Working Memory Capacity and Mind Wandering Frequency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(4): 461-471.

参考文献

*陈彩琦, 陈晓雪. (2016). 工作记忆资源对心智游移的影响. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 36(3), 21-25, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0964.2016.03.005
程凯, 曹贵康. (2014). 走神的理论假设、影响因素及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1435-1445
杜红芹. (2015). 心智游移在不同任务中的发生特点及影响因素. (博士学位论文). 华中师范大学,武汉.
孔海燕, 孙雨, 宋广文. (2018). 心智游移、工作记忆对初中生阅读理解的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 362-370, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.03.012
毛伟宾, 杨治良. (2008). 工作记忆容量研究新进展. 心理科学, 31(3), 741-743, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2008.03.056
宋晓兰, 唐孝威. (2012). 心智游移. 杭州:浙江大学出版社.
吴国来, 高原, 周曼. (2016). 阅读中的"心不在焉":理论假设和影响因素. 心理科学进展, 24(2), 196-202
吴国来, 周曼, 阴晓娟, 李海英, 李娇花. (2017). 走神对中文阅读绩效的影响. 心理与行为研究, 15(3), 329-334, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2017.03.007
*Banks, J. B. (2011). Is mind wandering the mechanism responsible for life stress induced impairments in working memory capacity?. (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of North Texas.
Carriere, J. S. A., Cheyne, J. A., Solman, G. J. F., & Smilek, D. (2010). Age trends for failures of sustained attention. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 569-574, doi:10.1037/a0019363.
Carriere, J. S. A., Seli, P., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body:Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(1), 19-31.
*Chun, M. S. (2015). The relationship between working memory and mind wandering honors thesis. (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of California.
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension:A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422-433.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory:Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Feng, S., D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 586-592.
Foulsham, T., Farley, J., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Mind wandering in sentence reading:Decoupling the link between mind and eye. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(1), 51-59, doi:10.1037/a0030217.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486-504, doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486.
Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., Mcvay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myingermeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when:An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614-621, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x.
*Kane, M. J., Gross, G. M., Chun, C. A., Smeekens, B. A., Meier, M. E., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2017). For whom the mind wanders, and when, varies across laboratory and daily-life settings. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1271-1289, doi:10.1177/0956797617706086.
Krawietz, S. A., Tamplin, A. K., & Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Aging and mind wandering during text comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 951-958, doi:10.1037/a0028831.
*Levinson, D. B., Smallwood, J., & Davidson, R. J. (2012). The persistence of thought:Evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking. Psychological Science, 23(4), 375-380, doi:10.1177/0956797611431465.
*Matt, E. M. (2018). Is there a positive association between working memory capacity and mind wandering in a low-demand breathing task? (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Western Carolina.
*Marcusson-Clavertz, D., Cardeña, E., & Terhune, D. B. (2016). Daydreaming style moderates the relation between working memory and mind wandering:Integrating two hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 451-464.
*Mcvay, J. C. (2010). The mediating role of mind wandering in the relationship between working memory capacity and reading comprehension. (Unpublished doctorial dissertation, pp. 94). The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
*Mcvay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought:Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 196-204.
Mcvay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on smallwood and schooler (2006) and watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 188-197, doi:10.1037/a0018298.
*Mcvay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to "d'oh!":Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 38(38), 525-549.
Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S., Phillips, D. T., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and gre performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science, 24(5), 776-781, doi:10.1177/0956797612459659.
*Robison, M. K., Gath, K. I., & Unsworth, N. (2017). The neurotic wandering mind:An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 649-663, doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1145706.
*Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2015). Working memory capacity offers resistance to mind-wandering and external distraction in a context-specific manner. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 680-690, doi:10.1002/acp.v29.5.
* Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2017). Working memory capacity and mind-wandering during low-demand cognitive tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 47-54, doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.012.
*Rummel, J., & Boywitt, C. D. (2014). Controlling the stream of thought:Working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1309-1315.
Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply:Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition, 125(2), 179-194, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.004.
Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out during reading:Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing:Visual metacognition in adults and children(pp. 204-226). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering minds and wavering rhythms:Linking mind wandering and behavioral variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 1-5.
Seli, P., Schacter, D. L., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2017). Increasing participant motivation reduces rates of intentional and unintentional mind wandering. Psychological Research, 16(2017), 1-13.
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946-958, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946.
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering:Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 487-518, doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331.
Smallwood, J., Brown, K., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal-parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought. Brain Research, 1428(47), 60-70.
*Smeekens, B. A. (2013). The role of working memory capacity and mind wandering in creativity and insight. (Unpublished master's thesis). The University North Carolina at Greensboro.
*Unsworth, N., & Mcmillan, B. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension:Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 832-842.
*Voss, M. J., Zukosky, M., & Wang, R. F. (2018). A new approach to differentiate states of mind wandering:Effects of working memory capacity. Cognition, 179, 202-212, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.013.

[1]	白慧慧, 王雨晴, 孙婉靖. 留守儿童心理韧性的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 261-267.
[2]	王家慰, 冼美君, 邢强. 任务数量与工作记忆容量对交错学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 15-21.
[3]	游旭群, 李倩钦, 张桢堉, 黄浦江, 刘志远. N-back任务训练迁移效果及其影响因素：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 794-801.
[4]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[5]	刘湍丽, 郝兴风, 邢敏, 白学军. 网络成瘾对大学生推理能力的影响：工作记忆容量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 642-649.
[6]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[7]	高峰, 白学军. 越努力越幸福—中国背景下成就动机与主观幸福感的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 466-472.
[8]	梁紫平, 单金磊, 王鹏鹏, 韩宗义, 金花. 整体运动知觉老化的方向不同步性及其总效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 8-15.
[9]	潘颖, 邓小平, 林正军, 刘岩. 中国学生英语语音意识与英语阅读成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 229-239.
[10]	刘文, 于增艳, 林丹华. 儿童青少年心理弹性与心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 31-37.
[11]	王超, 袁蒙蒙, 姜媛, 方平. 宜人性对企业家成就的影响：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 126-133.
[12]	辛素飞, 刘丽君, 辛自强, 林崇德. 中国大学生应对方式变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 779-785.
[13]	袁博, 孙向超, 游冉, 刘福会, 李伟强. 情绪对信任的影响:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 632-643.
[14]	刘含君兰, 赵守盈, 郭海辉. 篮球运动员视觉工作记忆对注意控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 315-320.
[15]	伍秋萍, 郑佩芸, 刘相辉. 3-12岁儿童对汉语声、韵、调的意识与早期阅读的关系：基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 643-653.