心理与行为研究

›› 2007, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 6-12.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

线索效度间隔对“采纳最佳”启发式的影响

孙红日1,2 阴国恩1   

  1. （1天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300074）（2天津工业大学管理学院，天津 300160）
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-11 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-20 发布日期:2007-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 孙红日

THE EFFECTS OF THE DISPERSION OF CUE VALIDATES ON ″TAKE-THE-BEST″ HEURISTIC

Sun Hongri1,2, Yin Guo′en1   

  1. （1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior，Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074; 2 Management School, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300160）
  • Received:2007-01-11 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-03-20 Published:2007-03-20
  • Contact: Sun Hongri

PDF (PC)

摘要： 以Br?觟der的“五线索二择一”任务为研究范式，探讨线索效度间隔对“采纳最佳”启发式的影响。结果发现：当线索效度间隔为0.04时，被试采用“采纳最佳”启发式的次数处于随机水平，随着线索效度间隔的增大，被试采用“采纳最佳”启发式的次数明显高于随机水平；对立线索信息不同，线索效度间隔对“采纳最佳”启发式的影响也不同。

关键词: 线索效度间隔, “采纳最佳”启发式, 对立线索, 策略

Abstract: The five-cues-of two-alternative-choice tasks proposed by Br?觟der in the first experiment in 2000 was used to investigate the effects of dispersion of cue validities on ″take-the-best″(TTB)heuristic. The results showed that the alternative favored by TTB heuristic was chosen at random when the dispersion of cue validities was 0.04, but more than chance when the dispersion of cue validities was 0.06 and 0.08; the effects of dispersion of cue validities on TTB heuristic were different while varied the information of conflicting cue.

Key words: dispersion of cue validities, ″take-the-best″ heuristic, conflicting cue, strategy

中图分类号: