3～8岁儿童对资源分配中贡献、努力和能力因素的权衡

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究选取3～4岁、5～6岁和7～8岁儿童，考察儿童在分配资源时对贡献、努力和能力因素的权衡，采用资源分配范式和在以上三维度上不同的人物故事情境。结果发现，各年龄儿童均最偏爱平等分配，相比之下，3～4岁儿童倾向分给贡献最大的个体最多的资源，7～8岁儿童则分给最努力的个体更多资源。儿童均较少按能力进行分配。随着年龄发展，儿童对贡献原则赋予的权重逐渐减弱，对个体努力的认可度逐渐增强，显示出儿童分配原则的发展变化。

关键词: 资源分配, 贡献, 努力, 公平行为

Abstract: The present study used the resource distribution paradigm and presented a story contained three characters who were differentiated in contribution, effort and competence. Three- to 4-year-old, 5- to 6-year-old, and 7- to 8-year-old children participated the study (n=110). Children were asked to distribute some resources to the three characters and justify their distributions. Results showed that children of all age groups preferred to distribute resources equally among the recipients. In comparison, 3- to 4-year-old children distributed more resources to the child who contributed most, while 7- to 8-year-old children gave the most to the one who worked hardest. Children seldom distributed resources according to individual’s competence. As becoming older, children’s distribution depended less on contribution, but more on effort, suggesting the development of children’s understanding of fairness principles.

Key words: resource distribution, contribution, effort, fair behavior

中图分类号:

B844

徐晓惠, 安静, 朱莉琪. 3～8岁儿童对资源分配中贡献、努力和能力因素的权衡[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 30-36.

XU Xiaohui, AN Jing, ZHU Liqi. Three- to 8-Year-Old Children’s Trading-Off Among Contribution, Effort and Talent[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(1): 30-36.

参考文献

方富熹, 王文忠. (1994). 小学儿童奖赏公平性的认知发展. 心理学报, 26(4), 354–361
牟毅, 朱莉琪. (2007). 公平和合作行为的认知神经机制. 中国行为医学科学, 16(12), 1140–1141
王斯, 苏彦捷. (2011). 儿童面对不同对象的公平性选择: 心理理论的作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 37(4), 26–32, doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdsk.2011.04.019
王笑楠, 郝洋, 苏彦捷. (2019). 竞争和合作对学龄前儿童分配模式的影响: 心理理论和抑制控制的作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(4), 385–392
易伟, 梅淑婷, 郑亚. (2019). 努力: 成本还是奖赏? 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1439–1450, doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2019.01439.
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328(5982), 1176–1178, doi: 10.1126/science.1187300.
Baumard, N., André, J. B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–78, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002202.
Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., & Chevallier, C. (2012). Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 492–498, doi: 10.1037/a0026598.
Benozio, A., & Diesendruck, G. (2015). From effort to value: Preschool children’s alternative to effort justification. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1423–1429, doi: 10.1177/0956797615589585.
Blake, P. R. (2018). Giving what one should: Explanations for the knowledge-behavior gap for altruistic giving. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 1–5, doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.041.
Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2014). Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science, 346(6207), 1251776, doi: 10.1126/science.1251776.
Cappelen, A. W., & Tungodden, B. (2011). Distributive interdependencies in liberal egalitarianism. Social Choice and Welfare, 36(1), 35–47, doi: 10.1007/s00355-010-0463-8.
Cappelen, A. W., Hole, A. D., Sorensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2007). The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 97(3), 818–827, doi: 10.1257/aer.97.3.818.
Chen, Y. X., Zhu, L. Q., & Chen, Z. (2013). Family income affects children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80419, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080419.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137–149, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x.
Elenbaas, L. (2019). Against unfairness: Young children’s judgments about merit, equity, and equality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 73–82, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.009.
Engelmann, J. M., & Tomasello, M. (2019). Children’s sense of fairness as equal respect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 454–463, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.001.
Hamann, K., Bender, J., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Meritocratic sharing is based on collaboration in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 121–128, doi: 10.1037/a0032965.
Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320(5879), 1092–1095, doi: 10.1126/science.1153651.
Kanngiesser, P., & Warneken, F. (2012). Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43979, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043979.g001.
Kienbaum, J., & Wilkening, F. (2009). Children’s and adolescents’ intuitive judgements about distributive justice: Integrating need, effort, and luck. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 481–498, doi: 10.1080/17405620701497299.
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2015). Origins and development of morality. In R. M. Lerner & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 701–749). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kim, B., Kim, E., & Lee, S. M. (2017). Examining longitudinal relationship among effort reward imbalance, coping strategies and academic burnout in Korean middle school students. School Psychology International, 38(6), 628–646, doi: 10.1177/0143034317723685.
Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239, doi: 10.1257/002205103771800013.
Kornbluh, M. E., Pykett, A. A., & Flanagan, C. A. (2019). Exploring the associations between youths’ explanations of poverty at the societal level and judgements of distributive justice. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 488–497, doi: 10.1037/dev0000523.
LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J. S., & Haidt, J. (2011). When getting something good is bad: Even three-year-olds react to inequality. Social Development, 20(1), 154–170, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00560.x.
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., De Lisi, R., & van Gulik, K. (2008). The effects of grade level, context, and family type on male and female adolescents’ distributive justice reasoning. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 107–124, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.003.
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Watkins, C., & Vinchur, A. J. (1994). The effect of relationship on children’s distributive justice reasoning. Child Development, 65(6), 1694–1700, doi: 10.2307/1131288.
Noh, J. Y., D’Esterre, A., & Killen. M. (2019). Effort or outcome? Children’s meritorious decisions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 1–14, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.005.
Paulus, M., Nöth, A., & Wörle, M. (2018). Preschoolers’ resource allocations align with their normative judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 175, 117–126, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.001.
Rizzo, M. T., & Killen, M. (2016). Children’s understanding of equity in the context of inequality. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 569–581, doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12150.
Rizzo, M. T., Elenbaas, L., Cooley, S., & Killen, M. (2016). Children’s recognition of fairness and others’ welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1307–1317, doi: 10.1037/dev0000134.
Schmidt, M. F. H., Svetlova, M., Johe, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Children’s developing understanding of legitimate reasons for allocating resources unequally. Cognitive Development, 37, 42–52, doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.11.001.
Schrift, R. Y., Kivetz, R., & Netzer, O. (2016). Complicating decisions: The work ethic heuristic and the construction of effortful decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(7), 807–829, doi: 10.1037/xge0000171.
Sigelman, C. K., & Waitzman, K. A. (1991). The development of distributive justice orientations: Contextual influences on children’s resource allocations. Child Development, 62(6), 1367–1378, doi: 10.2307/1130812.
Smetana, J. G., & Ball, C. L. (2019). Heterogeneity in children’s developing moral judgments about different types of harm. Developmental Psychology, 55(6), 1150–1163, doi: 10.1037/dev0000718.
Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2013). I should but I Won’t: Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59510, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059510.
Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children share the spoils after collaboration. Psychological Science, 22(2), 267–273, doi: 10.1177/0956797610395392.
Wittig, M., Jensen, K., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 324–337, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.004.

[1]	郝喜玲, 陈煊, 刘依冉. 失败恐惧对大学生失败学习的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 707-713.
[2]	朱娜平, 王文平, 李丽琼, 刘雁伶. 数量让位价值：5～10岁儿童公平分配发展的“此消彼长”[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 233-239.
[3]	陈衍, 江婷, 李玮, 陈取麟, 潘运, 胡思瑶. 合作中责任比较和分配评价差异的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 152-159.
[4]	何筱荷, 侯金芹, 陈祉妍. 父母婚姻质量对小学生家庭作业努力影响的追踪研究：亲子亲合的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 45-51.