感知的父母及教师支持与学生STEAM学习的持续性动机：学习兴趣和自我效能感的多重中介作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 37-44.

感知的父母及教师支持与学生STEAM学习的持续性动机：学习兴趣和自我效能感的多重中介作用

孙小坚^1,2,3, 宋乃庆^1,2,3, 梁学友⁴

1. 西南大学数学与统计学院，重庆 400715;
2. 西南大学基础教育研究中心，重庆 400715;
3. 中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心西南大学分中心，重庆 400715;
4. 西南大学附属中学，重庆 400715

收稿日期:2020-03-16 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-01-20
通讯作者: 宋乃庆,E-mail:songnq@swu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目（16ZDA229）；重庆市普通高中教育教学改革研究重点课题（2015CQJWGZ2033）；重庆市博士后特别资助项目

The Effects of Perceived Parent and Teacher Support on Continuing Motivation for STEAM Education: The Mediating Roles of Learning Interest and Self-Efficacy

SUN Xiaojian^1,2,3, SONG Naiqing^1,2,3, LIANG Xueyou⁴

1. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
2. Basic Education Research Centre, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
3. Southwest University Branch, Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Chongqing 400715;
4. High School Affiliated to Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

Received:2020-03-16 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于PISA2015年中国四省市数据，探讨了感知的父母和教师支持、STEAM学习兴趣及自我效能感对学生STEAM学习的持续性动机的影响。结果发现：感知的父母和教师支持显著地正向预测STEAM学习兴趣和自我效能感；STEAM学习兴趣和自我效能感在感知的父母支持和持续性动机间起完全中介作用，而在感知的教师支持与持续性动机间起部分中介作用。研究拓展了STEAM教育下学习动机的研究范围，为后续增强学生STEAM学习的持续性动机提供了相应的参考。

关键词: STEAM教育, 持续性动机, 感知的父母与教师支持, 学习兴趣, 自我效能感

Abstract: The goal of current study was to investigate the effects of learning interest, self-efficacy, and perceived parent and teacher supports on students’ continuing motivation for science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics (STEAM) education. A total of 7426 students were adopted from the 2015 Program for International Student Assessment B-S-J-G (Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Guangdong) samples. The results showed that: 1) Both perceived parent support and teacher support significantly predicted students’ learning interest and self-efficacy; in addition, perceived teacher support also significantly predicted students’ STEAM continuing motivation. 2) Students’ learning interest and self-efficacy had significant positive effects on students’ STEAM continuing motivation. 3) Learning interest and self-efficacy played complete mediating roles between perceived parent support and STEAM continuing motivation while playing partial mediating roles between perceived teacher support and STEAM continuing motivation.

Key words: STEAM education, continuing motivation, perceived parent and teacher support, learning interest, self-efficacy

中图分类号:

B844

孙小坚, 宋乃庆, 梁学友. 感知的父母及教师支持与学生STEAM学习的持续性动机：学习兴趣和自我效能感的多重中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 37-44.

SUN Xiaojian, SONG Naiqing, LIANG Xueyou. The Effects of Perceived Parent and Teacher Support on Continuing Motivation for STEAM Education: The Mediating Roles of Learning Interest and Self-Efficacy[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(1): 37-44.

参考文献

李淼云, 宋乃庆, 盛雅琦. (2019). “因班施教”: 课堂人际知觉对学生学习兴趣影响的多水平分析. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 37(4), 94–103
李淼云, 宋乃庆, 俞向军. (2019). 我国学习兴趣研究的文献计量与分析. 教育与教学研究, 33(4), 20–32
林崇德. (2009). 发展心理学 (第2版). 北京: 人民教育出版社.
刘小先, 龚少英, 周治金, 封晓伟, 于全磊. (2020). 父母自主支持、心理控制与初中生创意自我效能的关系: 学业情绪的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(1), 45–53
汤丹丹, 温忠麟. (2020). 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 43(1), 215–223
唐芹, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 王帆. (2013). 父母和教师自主支持与高中生发展的关系. 心理发展与教育, 29(6), 604–615
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731–745
张佳佳, 李红霞, 张明亮, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. (2019). 小学儿童感知到的教师支持、数学自我效能感与数学成绩的联系: 有调节的中介模型. 心理与行为研究, 17(5), 644–651
Artino, A. R. (2009). Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(2), 146–166, doi: 10.1007/s12528-009-9020-9.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518644.
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). A retrospective analysis of STEM career interest among mathematics and science academy students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 10(1), 45–58.
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340, doi: 10.1080/03634529009378813.
Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 222–239, doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.2.222.
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019). Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science Education, 103(3), 623–637, doi: 10.1002/sce.21499.
Fortus, D., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2014). Measuring students’ continuing motivation for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 497–522, doi: 10.1002/tea.21136.
Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 477–486, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0032.
Herndon, J. N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 11–14, doi: 10.1007/BF02905781.
Luo, T., Wang, J., Liu, X. F., & Zhou, J. P. (2019). Development and application of a scale to measure students’ STEM continuing motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1885–1904, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1647472.
Maehr, M. L. (1976). Continuing motivation: An analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 443–462, doi: 10.3102/00346543046003443.
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ozel, M., Caglak, S., & Erdogan, M. (2013). Are affective factors a good predictor of science achievement? Examining the role of affective factors based on PISA 2006. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 73–82, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.006.
Pascarella, E. T., Walberg, H. J., Junker, L. K., & Haertel, G. D. (1981). Continuing motivation in science for early and late adolescents. American Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 439–452, doi: 10.3102/00028312018004439.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146–163, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1154792.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Sha, L., Schunn, C., Bathgate, M., & Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2016). Families support their children’s success in science learning by influencing interest and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 450–472, doi: 10.1002/tea.21251.
Shernoff, D. J., & Hoogstra, L. (2001). Continuing motivation beyond the high school classroom. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93, 73–88.
Story, N. O., & Sullivan, H. J. (1986). Factors that influence continuing motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(2), 86–92, doi: 10.1080/00220671.1986.10885729.
Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2013). School, teacher, peers, and parents’ goals emphases and adolescents’ motivation to learn science in and out of school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 952–988, doi: 10.1002/tea.21103.
Wentzel, K. R., & Brophy, J. E. (2014). Motivating students to learn (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

[1]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[2]	刘拓, 陈雪明, 芦旭蓉, 杨莹. 父母积极教养方式对中学生应对方式的影响：社会支持、自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 507-514.
[3]	高嘉林, 贾天琪, 姜媛, 方平. 父母教育卷入与中学生创造性自我效能感：掌握目标和批判性思维的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 515-520.
[4]	蔡林, 贾绪计. 学业自我效能感与在线学习投入的关系：学习动机和心流体验的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 805-811.
[5]	刁春婷, 周文倩, 黄臻. 小学生成长型思维模式与学业成绩、生活满意度的关系：学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 524-529.
[6]	姚崇, 赵可欣, 周晨琛, 崔萌筱, 王党, 游旭群. 公费教育政策满意度对师范生教师职业认同的影响—社会认知因素的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 241-247.
[7]	张明, 陈改, 韩梅, 王竞一. 全纳教育教师职业使命感对工作幸福感的影响：自我效能感的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 248-254.
[8]	张佳佳, 李红霞, 张明亮, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. 小学儿童感知到的教师支持、数学自我效能感与数学成绩的联系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 644-651.
[9]	姜媛, 张力为, 毛志雄. 体育锻炼与心理健康：情绪调节自我效能感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 570-576.
[10]	金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 李肖肖, 张丽. 个人-组织契合与员工创造力的关系：有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 846-852.
[11]	梁三才, 吴海梅. 情绪调节自我效能感在神经质、尽责性与心盛之间的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 709-713.
[12]	雷玉菊, 张冬静, 牛更枫, 胡祥恩,. 网络学习中学习者个人特征对学习投入的影响：一个有调节的中介效应模型*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 181-188.
[13]	高锋剑,陈有国, 刘培朵, 江竹, 黄希庭. 心理韧性、孤独感、自我效能感预测老年人主观幸福感的优势分析*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 227-232.
[14]	张晶, 舒曾, 胡卫平, 孙汉银, 贺琼, 冷露, 方晓义. 教师创造性教学行为与中小学生创造性自我效能感的关系：一个有调节的中介模型*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 92-100.
[15]	王楠,张立艳,王洋. 创新自我效能感对创新行为的影响：多重中介效应分析^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 811-816.