形旁在形声字识别中的优势作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用脑电技术，以形旁和声旁均为独体字的形声字为实验材料，通过操纵形旁频率和声旁频率，在汉字命名任务中探讨了形旁和声旁在形声字识别中的作用。结果表明形旁频率在左脑诱发了P200效应，而声旁频率效应也表现在左脑，但是诱发的是N400变化而非P200的变化。随后的时程分析发现在左后脑区，形旁频率在200～500 ms时间窗内均显著或边缘显著，声旁的频率效应稍晚，从350 ms开始，持续到500 ms。结果说明在命名任务中，和声旁相比，形旁发挥作用较早，且持续的时间较长。

关键词: 形声字, 形旁, 声旁, ERPs

Abstract: In this study, event-related potentials technology was adopted. The Chinese phonogram in which the semantic radicals and the phonetic radicals were both integral characters were used as experimental materials. By manipulating the frequency of the semantic radicals and the phonetic radicals, the role of the semantic radicals and the phonetic radicals in the recognition of Chinese phonogram was explored in the naming task. The results showed that the frequency of the semantic radicals induced the P200 effect in the left hemisphere, while the frequency of the phonetic radicals induced the N400 effect. Subsequent time history analysis found that in the left posterior region, the effects of the frequency of the semantic radicals were significant or marginally significant within a time window of 200 to 500 ms, and the effects of the frequency of the phonetic radicals were slightly later, starting from 350 ms and lasting to 500 ms. The results showed that in the naming task, compared with the phonetic radicals, the semantic radicals took effect earlier and lasted longer. The semantic radicals had an advantage in the recognition of Chinese phonogram.

Key words: Chinese phonogram, semantic radical, phonetic radical, ERPs

中图分类号:

B842

李昀松, 陈启杨, 吴岩, 李天虹, 段如君. 形旁在形声字识别中的优势作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.

LI Yunsong, CHEN Qiyang, WU Yan, LI Tianhong, DUAN Rujun. The Dominant Role of Semantic Radicals in Chinese Phonogram Recognition[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.

参考文献

迟慧, 闫国利, 许晓露, 夏萤, 崔磊, 白学军. (2014). 声旁语音信息对形声字加工的影响——来自眼动研究的证据. 心理学报, 46(9), 1242–1260
高立群, 彭聃龄. (2005). 汉语形声字语音加工的前词汇通路. 心理科学, 28(4), 885–888, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2005.04.029
韩在柱, 毕彦超. (2009). 无需语音中介的阅读理解机制: 来自一例汉语失语症个案的新证据. 中国科学C辑: 生命科学, 39(3), 279–286
王娟, 马雪梅, 李兵兵, 张积家. (2019). 汉字形声字识别中义符和声符的家族效应. 心理学报, 51(8), 857–868
王协顺, 吴岩, 赵思敏, 倪超, 张明. (2016). 形旁和声旁在形声字识别中的作用. 心理学报, 48(2), 130–140
吴岩, 王协顺, 陈烜之. (2015). 汉字识别中部件结合率的作用: ERP研究. 心理学报, 47(2), 157–166
张积家, 王娟, 印丛. (2014). 声符和义符在形声字语音、语义提取中的作用——来自部件知觉眼动研究的证据. 心理学报, 46(7), 885–900
周有光. (1980). 汉字声旁读音便查. 长春: 吉林人民出版社.
Davis, C. P., Libben, G., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2019). Compounding matters: Event-related potential evidence for early semantic access to compound words. Cognition, 184, 44–52, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.006.
DeLong, K. A., & Kutas, M. (2020). Comprehending surprising sentences: Sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35, 1044–1063, doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1708960.
Hsiao, J. H. W., Shillcock, R., & Lavidor, M. (2006). A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition. Brain Research, 1078(1), 159–167, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.072.
Hsu, C. H., Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2009). Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 108(1), 56–66, doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.002.
Hung, Y. H., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wu. D. H. (2014). Tracking the temporal dynamics of the processing of phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character recognition by MEG. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 29, 42–65, doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.12.003.
Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Su, E. C. I., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. (2005). Consistency, regularity, and frequency effects in naming Chinese characters. Language and Linguistics, 6, 75–107.
Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In P. McCardle, B. Miller, J. R. Lee, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Dyslexia across languages: Orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link (pp. 146–168). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N. N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00519.
Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(2), 203–224, doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2538.
Taler, V., & Phillips, N. A. (2007). Event-related brain potential evidence for early effects of neighborhood density in word recognition. NeuroReport, 18(18), 1957–1961, doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f202f5.
Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Phonological activation in visual identification of Chinese two-character words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 382–393, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.382.
Tong, X. H., Shen, W., Li, Z., Xu, M. D., Pan, L. P., & Tong, S. X. (2020). Phonological, not semantic, activation dominates Chinese character recognition: Evidence from a visual world eye-tracking study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4), 617–628, doi: 10.1177/1747021819887956.
Wang, X. J., Zhao, R., Zevin, J. D., & Yang, J. F. (2016). The neural correlates of the interaction between semantic and phonological processing for Chinese character reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 947.
Wang, X. S., Pei, M., Wu, Y., & Su, Y. J. (2017). Semantic radicals contribute more than phonetic radicals to the recognition of Chinese phonograms: Behavioral and ERP evidence in a factorial study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2230, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02230.
Williams, C. (2013). Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners. Reading and Writing, 26(2), 293–315, doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9368-5.
Williams, C., & Bever, T. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605, doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0.
Wu, Y., Mo, D. Y., Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2012). ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 514(2), 164–168, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080.
Zhou, L., Peng, G., Zheng, H. Y., Su, I. F., & Wang, W. S. Y. (2013). Sub-lexical phonological and semantic processing of semantic radicals: A primed naming study. Reading and Writing, 26(6), 967–989, doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9402-7.
Zhou, W., Shu, H., Miller, K., & Yan, M. (2018). Reliance on orthography and phonology in reading of Chinese: A developmental study. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 370–391, doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12111.

[1]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[2]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[3]	马利军, 梁俊煜, 马云霄. 谐音线索和“歇后”时间对谐音型歇后语理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 325-331.
[4]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[5]	岳鹏飞, 史梦梦, 刘旭, 白学军. 词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 31-38.
[6]	李恒平, 何胜昔, 刘正奎. 快速阅读训练对基于视觉定向搜索的注意力影响：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 78-84.
[7]	王春梅, 吕勇. 高、低回避性消极情绪影响抑制功能的神经机制：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 577-582.
[8]	梅冬梅, 许远理. 元情绪对情绪感受的抑制作用：来自ERP的证据*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 449-455.
[9]	邱桂凤，张庆林. 反应与刺激冲突的脑机制差异:来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 583-587.
[10]	谭钢, 侯玉玲, 曹智鹏. 遥远距离联想任务脑机制的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 746-751.
[11]	杜英春, 吕勇. 面孔加工特异性的事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(4): 268-274.
[12]	穆瑾,韩布新,陈天勇. 声旁规则性对命名声旁和整字的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(3): 178-181.