无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 433-438,446.

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究

张苏媛^1,2,3,4, 兰泽波^1,2,3, 张水⁵, 孟珠^1,2,3, 闫国利^1,2,3

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387;
4. 天津商业大学马克思主义学院，天津 300134;
5. 天津市北辰区佳宁里小学，天津 300400

收稿日期:2021-02-01 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-07-20
通讯作者: 闫国利,E-mail:psyygl@163.com
基金资助:
天津市教学成果重点培育项目（PYJJ-039）

The Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Reading Among First Graders First-Grade Students: An Eye-Tracking Study

ZHANG Suyuan^1,2,3,4, LAN Zebo^1,2,3, ZHANG Shui⁵, MENG Zhu^1,2,3, YAN Guoli^1,2,3

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387;
4. College of Marxism,Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134;
5. Tianjin Beichen District Jianingli Primary School, Tianjin 300400

Received:2021-02-01 Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 无关言语效应对成人阅读的影响已经得到证实，但是很少有研究探讨儿童阅读中的无关言语效应。为了考察汉语初学者的阅读中是否存在无关言语效应，本研究使用眼动仪记录阅读过程，考察四种不同的背景音（有意义言语、无意义言语、白噪音、安静）对一年级小学生句子阅读的影响。结果发现：与安静条件相比，有意义言语条件下句子的总阅读时间更长，注视次数和回视次数更多，眼跳幅度更大；局部分析发现，有意义言语条件下，汉字的总注视时间更长，首次注视时间和凝视时间在各种声音条件下没有显著差异。这表明儿童阅读中存在无关言语效应，而且有意义言语影响了词汇的晚期加工。

关键词: 无关言语效应, 一年级小学生, 阅读, 眼动

Abstract: The effects of irrelevant speech on adult reading have been confirmed, but few studies have assessed children’s reading performance in the presence of irrelevant speech. To investigate whether there is an irrelevant speech effect for Chinese beginning readers, the present study recorded the eye movements of first-grade students during sentence reading. Four different background speeches were manipulated, that is, meaningful speech, meaningless speech, pink noise, and silence. The results showed that compared with silence, the reading performance under the meaningful speech condition was disrupted, such that longer reading time and saccade length, more fixation and regression counts. In the local analyses, the total fixation duration was increased in the meaningful speech condition than that of in the silence condition, however, such effect was absent on the measure of first fixation duration and gaze duration. These findings indicate that meaningful speech condition influences the reading of first graders, and influences the late word processing.

Key words: irrelevant speech effect, first-grade student, reading, eye movement

中图分类号:

B842

张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.

ZHANG Suyuan, LAN Zebo, ZHANG Shui, MENG Zhu, YAN Guoli. The Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Reading Among First Graders First-Grade Students: An Eye-Tracking Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.

参考文献

何立媛, 黄有玉, 王梦轩, 孟珠, 闫国利. (2015). 不同背景音对中文篇章阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 38(6), 1290–1295
孟珠, 闫国利. (2017). 阅读任务中无关言语效应的作用机制: 干扰基于内容还是过程? 心理科学进展, 26(2), 262–269.
闫国利, 孟珠. (2018). 无关言语对阅读的干扰基于内容还是过程?——来自眼动研究的证据. 心理科学, 41(1), 2–7
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589–605
闫国利, 张巧明, 白学军. (2013). 中文阅读知觉广度的影响因素研究. 心理发展与教育, 29(2), 121–130
俞锦旺, 孟珠, 秦钊, 邓志洲, 赵绍晨, 闫国利. (2020). 中文词汇加工过程中的无关言语效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(5), 611–617
Cauchard, F., Cane, J. E., & Weger, U. W. (2012). Influence of background speech and music in interrupted reading: An eye-tracking study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 381–390, doi: 10.1002/acp.1837.
Chall, J. S. (1996). American reading achievement: Should we worry? Research in the Teaching of English, 30(3), 303–310.
Chein, J. M., & Schneider, W. (2012). The brain’s learning and control architecture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 78–84, doi: 10.1177/0963721411434977.
Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 17–31, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90003-7.
Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. M. (2006). Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 509–525, doi: 10.1080/01411920600635494.
Elliott, E. M. (2002). The irrelevant-speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 478–487.
Guerra, G., Tijms, J., Vaessen, A., Tierney, A., Dick, F., & Bonte, M. (2021). Loudness and intelligibility of irrelevant background speech differentially hinder children’s short story reading. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(1), 77–87, doi: 10.1111/mbe.12264.
Hughes, R. W. (2014). Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account. PsyCh Journal, 3(1), 30–41, doi: 10.1002/pchj.44.
Hyönä, J., & Ekholm, M. (2016). Background speech effects on sentence processing during reading: An eye movement study. PLoS One, 11(3), e0152133, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152133.
Jones, D., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(4), 645–669, doi: 10.1080/14640749208401304.
Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 369–381, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.369.
Klatte, M., Lachmann, T., Schlittmeier, S., & Hellbrück, J. (2010). The irrelevant sound effect in short-term memory: Is there developmental change? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(8), 1168–1191, doi: 10.1080/09541440903378250.
Ljung, R., Sörqvist, P., & Hygge, S. (2009). Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children’s reading and mathematical performance. Noise and Health, 11(45), 194–198, doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56212.
Martin, R. C., Wogalter, M. S., & Forlano, J. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 382–398, doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90063-0.
Meng, Z., Lan, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2020). Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10), 1892–1905, doi: 10.1037/xlm0000861.
Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 403–423.
Oswald, C. J. P., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2000). Disruption of comprehension by the meaning of irrelevant sound. Memory, 8(5), 345–350, doi: 10.1080/09658210050117762.
R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 211–236, doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(86)90037-8.
Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(2), 150–164, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7.
Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(1), 107–122, doi: 10.1080/14640748908402355.
Vasilev, M. R., Liversedge, S. P., Rowan, D., Kirkby, J. A., & Angele, B. (2019). Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(11), 1484–1512, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000680.
Vorstius, C., Radach, R., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Eye movements in developing readers: A comparison of silent and oral sentence reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 458–485.
Yan, G. L., Meng, Z., Liu, N., He, L. Y., & Paterson, K. B. (2018). Effects of irrelevant background speech on eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 1270–1275, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1339718.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	仝文, 余雪, 刘志方, 朱星宇, 齐琦. 快慢读者利用语境信息的差异：加工深度的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 450-456.
[4]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[5]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[6]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.
[7]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[8]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[9]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[10]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[11]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[12]	张笛, 赵微, 李莉, 高桂丽. 早期词意识测量及其对阅读的预测作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 771-778.
[13]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[14]	刘志方, 曾台燊, 柴林, 陈朝阳, 仝文. 失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工特点：消失文本证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 592-598.
[15]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.

无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究

The Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Reading Among First Graders First-Grade Students: An Eye-Tracking Study

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价