愤怒诱发干扰冲动性暴力犯行为抑制晚期阶段：来自ERP的证据

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.06.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用双选择oddball范式和事件相关电位技术（ERP），使用视频诱发愤怒情绪，考察冲动性暴力犯在愤怒状态下的行为抑制能力。行为结果发现，被试在愤怒状态下偏差刺激与标准刺激的反应时之差显著长于中性状态。脑电结果发现，对照组在愤怒状态和中性状态下的P3波幅没有显著差异，但是冲动性暴力犯在愤怒状态下的P3波幅显著大于中性状态。结果表明，个体在愤怒状态下行为抑制存在困难，冲动性暴力犯组和对照组在愤怒状态下行为抑制的差异主要体现在晚期P3成分上。

关键词: 冲动性暴力犯, 愤怒, 行为抑制, ERP

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the behavioral inhibition of impulsive violent offenders in the state of anger by using two-choice oddball task and event-related potential (ERP) techniques. We used film clips to induce participants’ anger. Behavioral results showed that irrespective of groups, the difference between the deviant stimulus and standard stimulus response time in anger state was significantly longer than that in neutral state. ERP results showed that in the control group, P3 amplitudes showed no difference between anger state and neutral state. However, in impulsive violent offenders, anger led to larger P3 amplitudes than neutral. The present study demonstrated that individuals had difficulty with behavioral inhibition in anger. The difference of behavioral inhibition between the impulsive violent offenders and the control group was mainly reflected in the P3 component.

Key words: impulsive violent offenders, anger, behavioral inhibition, event-related potential

中图分类号:

B849

毋嫘, 赵晨光, 陈瀚强, 刘天骄, 康威, 李昕雨. 愤怒诱发干扰冲动性暴力犯行为抑制晚期阶段：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 842-849.

Lei WU, Chenguang ZHAO, Hanqiang CHEN, Tianjiao LIU, Wei KANG, Xinyu LI. Anger Induction Interferes with the Late Stages of Behavioral Inhibition of Impulsive Violent Offenders: Evidence from ERP Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 842-849.

图/表 5

图1 双选择oddball任务流程图

图2 对照组在中性和愤怒条件下偏差－标准差异波（Cz、CPz）

图3 冲动性暴力犯组在中性和愤怒条件下偏差－标准差异波（Cz、CPz）

图4 两组被试在愤怒和中性条件下N2、P3成分差异波地形图

表1 两组被试在不同条件下双选择oddball任务的反应时（M±SD）（ms）

条件	对照组	冲动性暴力犯组
中性标准	410±93	356±53
中性偏差	488±112	431±45
愤怒标准	392±90	336±44
愤怒偏差	489±104	438±44

参考文献

	曹慧, 关梅林, 张建新青少年暴力犯的情绪调节方式. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2007, 15 (5): 539- 542.
	靳高风, 郭一霖, 李昂霖疫情防控背景下中国犯罪形势变化与趋势——2019—2020年中国犯罪形势分析与预测. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 36 (3): 1- 9.
	刘旭. (2009). 两类青少年暴力犯抑制控制功能差异的ERP证据 (硕士学位论文). 中国政法大学, 北京.
	刘毅, 丁强, 何煊暴力犯冲动性情绪自我控制的干预及其效果——一种叙事认知的方法. 犯罪与改造研究, 2019, (6): 31- 35.
	罗亚莉, 张大均, 刘云波, 刘衍玲特质愤怒量表中文版在大学生人群应用的信度和效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25 (9): 700- 704.
	乔屹, 谢斌, 张明岛. (2009). 冲动−预谋性攻击行为量表中文版的信效度检验. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, (4), 366–368.
	任子楠情绪背景下的行为抑制控制及其神经机制研究. 心理学进展, 2019, 9 (2): 210- 216.
	辛勇, 李红, 袁加锦负性情绪干扰行为抑制控制: 一项事件相关电位研究. 心理学报, 2010, 42 (3): 334- 341.
	杨丽珠, 杜文轩, 沈悦特质愤怒与反应性攻击的综合认知模型述评. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19 (9): 1249- 1258.
	杨苏勇, 黄宇霞, 张慧君, 罗跃嘉情绪影响行为抑制的脑机制. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18 (4): 605- 615.
	袁加锦, 徐萌萌, 杨洁敏, 李红双选择Oddball范式在行为抑制控制研究中的应用. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2017, 47 (10): 1065- 1073.
	赵小淋, 张燕, 王建峰情绪对不同外倾水平个体行为抑制的影响. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16 (4): 449- 457.
	郑璞, 刘聪慧, 俞国良情绪诱发方法述评. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20 (1): 45- 55.
	Albert, J., López-Martín, S., & Carretié, L. Emotional context modulates response inhibition: Neural and behavioral data. NeuroImage, 2010, 49 (1): 914- 921. DOI
	Chen, C. Y., Tien, Y. M., Juan, C. H., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. Neural correlates of impulsive-violent behavior: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 2005, 16 (11): 1213- 1216. DOI
	Dong, G. H., Lu, Q. L., Zhou, H., & Zhao, X. Impulse inhibition in people with internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neuroscience Letters, 2010, 485 (2): 138- 142. DOI
	Dong, G. H., Yang, L. Z., Hu, Y. B., & Jiang, Y. Is N2 associated with successful suppression of behavior responses in impulse control processes. NeuroReport, 2009, 20 (6): 537- 542. DOI
	Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. The N2 in Go/No-Go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 2004, 56 (2): 165- 176. DOI
	Finkel, E. J., DeWall, C. N., Slotter, E. B., McNulty, J. K., Pond, R. S., Jr., & Atkins, D. C. Using I³ theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 102 (3): 533- 549. DOI
	Gabert-Quillen, C. A., Bartolini, E. E., Abravanel, B. T., & Sanislow, C. A. Ratings for emotion film clips. Behavior Research Methods, 2015, 47 (3): 773- 787. DOI
	Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion, 9(1), 87–108.
	Hagger, M. S., Wood, C. W., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. Self-regulation and self-control in exercise: The strength-energy model. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2010, 3 (1): 62- 86. DOI
	Joseph, D. L., Chan, M. Y., Heintzelman, S. J., Tay, L., Diener, E., & Scotney, V. S. The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 2020, 146 (4): 355- 375. DOI
	Landmann, H., & Hess, U. Testing moral foundation theory: Are specific moral emotions elicited by specific moral transgressions. Journal of Moral Education, 2018, 47 (1): 34- 47. DOI
	Lin, L., Wang, C. X., Mo, J. C., Liu, Y., Liu, T., Jiang, Y. P., ... Wu, X. Differences in behavioral inhibitory control in response to angry and happy emotions among college students with and without suicidal ideation: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 2191. DOI
	Munro, G. E. S., Dywan, J., Harris, G. T., Mckee, S., Unsal, A., & Segalowitz, S. J. Response inhibition in psychopathy: The frontal N2 and P3. Neuroscience Letters, 2007, 418 (2): 149- 153. DOI
	Ocklenburg, S., Peterburs, J., Mertzen, J., Schmitz, J., Güntürkün, O., & Grimshaw, G. M. Effects of emotional valence on hemispheric asymmetries in response inhibition. Symmetry, 2017, 9 (8): 145. DOI
	Pessoa, L. How do emotion and motivation direct executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2009, 13 (4): 160- 166. DOI
	Schönenberg, M., & Jusyte, A. Investigation of the hostile attribution bias toward ambiguous facial cues in antisocial violent offenders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2014, 264 (1): 61- 69. DOI
	Siep, N., Tonnaer, F., van de Ven, V., Arntz, A., Raine, A., & Cima, M. Anger provocation increases limbic and decreases medial prefrontal cortex connectivity with the left amygdala in reactive aggressive violent offenders. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2019, 13 (5): 1311- 1323. DOI
	Smith, J. L., Johnstone, S. J., & Barry, R. J. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2008, 119 (3): 704- 714. DOI
	Spielberger, C. D., Sydeman, S. J., Owen, A. E., & Marsh, B. J. (1999). Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (pp. 993–1021). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
	Stanford, M. S., Houston, R. J., Mathias, C. W., Villemarette-Pittman, N. R., Helfritz, L. E., & Conklin, S. M. (2003). Characterizing aggressive behavior. Assessment, 10(2), 183–190.
	Stockdale, L. A., Morrison, R. G., & Silton, R. L. The influence of stimulus valence on perceptual processing of facial expressions and subsequent response inhibition. Psychophysiology, 2020, 57 (2): e13467.
	Sun, L. J., Li, J. Y., Niu, G. F., Zhang, L., & Chang, H. J. Reactive aggression affects response inhibition to angry expressions in adolescents: An event-related potential study using the emotional Go/No-Go paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 558461. DOI
	Tonnaer, F., Siep, N., van Zutphen, L., Arntz, A., & Cima, M. Anger provocation in violent offenders leads to emotion dysregulation. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1): 3583. DOI
	Vedelago, L., Amlung, M., Morris, V., Petker, T., Balodis, I., McLachlan, K., … MacKillop, J. Technological advances in the assessment of impulse control in offenders: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2019, 37 (4): 435- 451.
	Wang, X. X., Rodiek, S., Wu, C. Z., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. X. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 15, 112- 122.
	Weidacker, K., Snowden, R. J., Boy, F., & Johnston, S. J. Response inhibition in the parametric Go/No-Go task in psychopathic offenders. Psychiatry Research, 2017, 250, 256- 263. DOI
	Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. The cognitive basis of trait anger and reactive aggression: An integrative analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2008, 12 (1): 3- 21. DOI
	Xia, X., Zhang, G. H., & Wang, X. C. Anger weakens behavioral inhibition selectively in contact athletes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2018, 12, 463. DOI
	Yang, S. Y., Luo, W. B., Zhu, X. R., Broster, L. S., Chen, T. L., Li, J. Z., & Luo, Y. J. Emotional content modulates response inhibition and perceptual processing. Psychophysiology, 2014, 51 (11): 1139- 1146. DOI
	Yu, F. Q., Yuan, J. J., & Luo, Y. J. Auditory-induced emotion modulates processes of response inhibition: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 2009, 20 (1): 25- 30. DOI
	Yu, F. Q., Zhou, X. Q., Qing, W., Li, D., Li, J., Chen, X. G., ... Wang, K. Decreased response inhibition to sad faces during explicit and implicit tasks in females with depression: Evidence from an event-related potential study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 2017, 259, 42- 53. DOI
	Zhang, Z., Wang, Q. L., Liu, X., Song, P., & Yang, B. Differences in inhibitory control between impulsive and premeditated aggression in juvenile inmates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017, 11, 373. DOI

[1]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 悲伤表情识别能力影响疼痛共情—一项ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 585-592.
[2]	邢晓沛, 焦梦涵, 肖宇苑, 胡夏. 父母心理攻击与小学中高年级儿童问题行为的关系：儿童愤怒和悲伤管理的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 479-486.
[3]	丁倩, 罗星雨. 歧视知觉对留守青少年攻击行为的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 346-352.
[4]	郭丰波, 黄佳珊, 刘腾飞, 谷莉. 社会责任感调节群际替代性排斥中旁观者第三方惩罚[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 397-403.
[5]	张政华, 张航, 王兵, 郑子龙, 赵黎明, 李卫君. 不同任务下声调和韵母在诗句中的加工过程——来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 728-735.
[6]	李昀松, 陈启杨, 吴岩, 李天虹, 段如君. 形旁在形声字识别中的优势作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.
[7]	朱文凤, 夏凌翔. 大学生神经质纵向预测攻击行为的时间路径模型：敌意归因偏向和愤怒沉浸的双向中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 396-402.
[8]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[9]	孙霁, 孙沛. 大小数量加工机制分离现象的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 1-7.
[10]	呼军艳, 张庆霞, 王海峰. 人际冲突与安全工作行为：愤怒和报复动机的多重中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 826-832.
[11]	马利军, 梁俊煜, 马云霄. 谐音线索和“歇后”时间对谐音型歇后语理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 325-331.
[12]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[13]	刘芳芳, 姜英杰. 主题与类属关系的距离对分类和属性推理过程的影响：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 24-30.
[14]	岳鹏飞, 史梦梦, 刘旭, 白学军. 词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 31-38.
[15]	李恒平, 何胜昔, 刘正奎. 快速阅读训练对基于视觉定向搜索的注意力影响：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 78-84.