汉语词切分和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响：眼动的证据

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.001

心理与行为研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 1-7.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.001

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

汉语词切分和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响：眼动的证据

郭梅华¹^,², 兰泽波³, 巫金根¹^,⁴, 李赛男⁵, 吴俊杰¹, 闫国利¹^,*()

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津师范大学心理学部，学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387
2. 闽南师范大学教育与心理学院，闽南师范大学应用心理学研究所，福建省应用认知与人格重点实验室，漳州 363000
3. 福建医科大学健康学院，福州 350122
4. 阳光学院儿童发展与教育学院，福州 350015
5. 天津市教育科学研究院，德育与教育心理研究所，天津 300191

收稿日期:2022-09-15 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-01-20
通讯作者: 闫国利
基金资助:
2022年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(22JJD190012)。

The Effect of Word Segmentation and Font Size on Perceptual Span in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements

Meihua GUO¹^,², Zebo LAN³, Jingen WU¹^,⁴, Sainan LI⁵, Junjie WU¹, Guoli YAN¹^,*()

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387
2. School of Education and Psychology, Institute of Applied Psychology, Fujian Key Laboratory of Applied Cognition and Personality, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000
3. School of Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350122
4. College of Child Development and Education, Yango University, Fuzhou 350015
5. Institute of Moral Education and Educational Psychology, Tianjin Academy of Educational Science, Tianjin 300191

Received:2022-09-15 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-01-20
Contact: Guoli YAN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究采用移动窗口范式，探讨汉语词切分线索和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响，采用3(词切分线索：不切分、正确词切分、错误词切分)×2(字号：大、小)×4(窗口：L1R2、L1R3、L1R4、整行)的被试内实验设计。结果发现，字号与窗口交互作用不显著，词切分线索、字号与窗口的交互作用也不显著。结果表明，字号对汉语阅读知觉广度的影响可能非常有限，词切分线索也不调节字号对汉语阅读知觉广度的影响。

关键词: 字号, 阅读知觉广度, 词切分线索

Abstract:

Using a moving window paradigm and eye tracker, the present study primarily investigated the effect of word segmentation and font size on perceptual span in Chinese reading. The experiment employed a within-subject experimental design with three factors, that is, word segmentation (no-segmentation, correct-segmentation, wrong-segmentation), font size (large, small), and window condition (L1R2, L1R3, L1R4, Full line). The results showed that there was no significant interaction between font size and window condition, nor significant interaction among word segmentation cues, font size and window condition. These findings suggest that the influence of font size on perceptual span in Chinese reading may be very limited, and word segmentation cues do not moderate this effect.

Key words: font size, perceptual span in reading, word segmentation cues

中图分类号:

B842

郭梅华, 兰泽波, 巫金根, 李赛男, 吴俊杰, 闫国利. 汉语词切分和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响：眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 1-7.

Meihua GUO, Zebo LAN, Jingen WU, Sainan LI, Junjie WU, Guoli YAN. The Effect of Word Segmentation and Font Size on Perceptual Span in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 1-7.

图/表 3

参考文献

	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19 (5): 606- 611.
	刘志方, 张智君, 田迅. 字号和词频对汉语阅读眼动模式的影响. 人类工效学, 2012, 18 (1): 16- 20.
	王丽红, 闫国利. 阅读知觉广度研究中掩蔽刺激干扰效应的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 2020, 40 (4): 318- 324.
	巫金根, 闫国利, 刘志方. 大小字号的文本对中文读者阅读知觉广度和眼动模式的影响. 心理科学, 2014, 37 (1): 10- 15.
	闫国利, 张巧明, 白学军. 中文阅读知觉广度的影响因素研究. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29 (2): 121- 130.
	Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P.. Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 2010, 3 (2): 12- 28. DOI
	Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 2013, 68 (3): 255- 278. DOI
	Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015, 67 (1): 1- 48.
	Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R.. A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1999, 22 (4): 661- 674. DOI
	Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P.. Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2009, 102 (2): 167- 181. DOI
	Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading, with a review of the history of reading and writing, and of methods, texts, and hygiene in reading. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
	Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. M.. The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1998, 24 (1): 20- 34. DOI
	Knehr, C. A.. The effects of monocular vision on measures of reading efficiency and perceptual span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941, 29 (2): 133- 154. DOI
	Li, X. S., Huang, L. J. Q., Yao, P. P., & Hyönä, J.. Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2022, 1 (3): 133- 144. DOI
	Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A.. An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 2020, 127 (6): 1139- 1162. DOI
	Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552.
	Luckiesh, M., & Moss, F. K.. The extent of the perceptual span in reading. The Journal of General Psychology, 1941, 25 (2): 267- 272. DOI
	McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K.. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 1975, 17 (6): 578- 586.
	Meixner, J. M., Nixon, J. S., & Laubrock, J.. The perceptual span is dynamically adjusted in response to foveal load by beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2022, 151 (6): 1219- 1232. DOI
	Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. I.. Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 2020, 112, 104092. DOI
	Miellet, S., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C.. Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 2009, 20 (6): 721- 728. DOI
	Morrison, R. E., & Rayner, K.. Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Perception & Psychophysics, 1981, 30 (4): 395- 396.
	O’Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395–453). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
	Osaka, N. (1992). Size of saccade and fixation duration of eye movements during reading: Psychophysics of Japanese text processing. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science, 9(1), 5–13.
	Rayner, K.. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1986, 41 (2): 211- 236. DOI
	Rayner, K.. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506. DOI
	Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N.. Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2010, 17 (6): 834- 839.
	Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A.. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2003, 26 (4): 445- 476. DOI
	Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 482–490.
	Sperlich, A., Meixner, J., & Laubrock, J.. Development of the perceptual span in reading: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2016, 146, 181- 201. DOI
	Sperlich, A., Schad, D. J., & Laubrock, J.. When preview information starts to matter: Development of the perceptual span in German beginning readers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2015, 27 (5): 511- 530. DOI
	Su, J., Yin, G. E., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Kurtev, S., Warrington, K. L., ... Paterson, K. B. (2020). Flexibility in the perceptual span during reading: Evidence from Mongolian. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 1566–1572.
	Xie, F., Wang, J. X., Hao, L. S., Zhang, X., & Warrington, K. L.. Perceptual span is independent of font size for older and young readers: Evidence from Chinese. Psychology and Aging, 2020, 35 (7): 1026- 1040. DOI
	Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J. E., & Zhou, X. L.. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010, 36 (6): 1669- 1676. DOI
	Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R.. Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 2015, 41 (1): 209- 219. DOI
	Zhou, W., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M.. A validation of parafoveal semantic information extraction in reading Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 2013, 36 (Suppl. 1): S51- S63.

词切分线索	窗口	句子
不切分	L1R2	大祖双力甲天云的天空土想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R3	大祖双力甲天云的天空上想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R4	大祖双力甲天云的天空上照想看玫空约全互。 *
	FL	太阳从万里无云的天空上照射着故宫的金瓦。 *
正确切分	L1R2	大祖双力甲天云的天空土想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R3	大祖双力甲天云的天空上想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R4	大祖双力甲天云的天空上照盯看玫空约全互。 *
	FL	太阳从万里无云的天空上照射着故宫的金瓦。 *
错误切分	L1R2	大祖双力甲天云的天空土想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R3	大祖双力甲天云的天空上想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R4	大祖双力甲天云的天空上照盯看玫空约全互。 *
	FL	太阳从万里无云的天空上照射着故宫的金瓦。 *

词切分线索	窗口	句子
不切分	L1R2	大祖双力甲天云的天空土想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R3	大祖双力甲天云的天空上想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R4	大祖双力甲天云的天空上照想看玫空约全互。 *
	FL	太阳从万里无云的天空上照射着故宫的金瓦。 *
正确切分	L1R2	大祖双力甲天云的天空土想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R3	大祖双力甲天云的天空上想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R4	大祖双力甲天云的天空上照盯看玫空约全互。 *
	FL	太阳从万里无云的天空上照射着故宫的金瓦。 *
错误切分	L1R2	大祖双力甲天云的天空土想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R3	大祖双力甲天云的天空上想盯看玫空约全互。 *
	L1R4	大祖双力甲天云的天空上照盯看玫空约全互。 *
	FL	太阳从万里无云的天空上照射着故宫的金瓦。 *

[1]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[2]	巫金根, 刘志方, 刘妮娜, 黄发杰. 高低水平汉英二语者阅读难易英语句子的知觉广度[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 460-465.
[3]	李韵静, 张红葵, 白柳, 王越, 程小云, 范宏玮, 闫国利. 小学五年级学生英语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 225-229.
[4]	王丽红, 白学军, 闫国利. 汉语阅读知觉广度的老化：一项眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 763-768.
[5]	伏干,闫国利. 高中二年级学生双字词阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(4): 285-290.
[6]	熊建萍, 闫国利白学军. 高中二年级学生中文阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. , 2007, 5(1): 60-64.

汉语词切分和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响：眼动的证据

The Effect of Word Segmentation and Font Size on Perceptual Span in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements

RichHTML

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价