三维空间深度位置上情绪面孔对返回抑制的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过虚拟现实技术构建虚拟三维场景，将Posner线索化范式应用到三维空间，通过两个实验操纵了目标深度、线索有效性以及情绪面孔的效价，考察了三维空间深度位置上情绪面孔如何影响视觉空间返回抑制。结果发现，(1)情绪面孔作为目标时，目标出现在近处空间，情绪面孔效价与返回抑制存在交互作用，负性面孔下的返回抑制减小；(2)情绪面孔作为线索时，目标出现在远处空间，情绪面孔效价与返回抑制存在交互作用，负性面孔下的返回抑制增大。研究表明，三维空间中情绪面孔能够影响返回抑制的大小，且这种影响在远近空间下存在差异。

关键词: 三维空间, 返回抑制, 情绪面孔, 注意定向

Abstract:

The present study investigated the interaction between inhibition of return (IOR) and emotional faces processing in 3-D space by incorporating the Posner exogenous cueing paradigm into a virtual three-dimensional (3-D) space. Three independent variables of cue validity (valid vs. invalid), target depth (near vs. far) and valence of emotional face (positive vs. negative) were manipulated. In Experiment 1, emotional faces (positive/negative) were used as the target, and the participants were asked to judge the gender of emotional faces quickly and accurately. In Experiment 2, we used emotional faces (positive/negative) as the cue, and asked the participants to detect the location of the blue ball. The results showed that: 1) When emotional faces were used as targets and appeared in near space, there was an interaction between the valence of emotional face and IOR, showing that IOR decreased under negative faces condition. 2) When emotional faces were used as cues and the target appeared in far space, there was an interaction between the valence of emotional face and IOR, showing that IOR increased under negative faces condition. The results indicate that IOR is affected by the emotional face processing when attention is oriented or reoriented in the depth.

Key words: three-dimensional (3-D) space, inhibition of return (IOR), emotional faces, attentional orienting

中图分类号:

B842

钱程, 赵越, 牛溪溪, 顾佳灿, 王爱君. 三维空间深度位置上情绪面孔对返回抑制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 8-14.

Cheng QIAN, Yue ZHAO, Xixi NIU, Jiacan GU, Aijun WANG. Effects of Emotional Faces on Inhibition of Return in Three-Dimensional Space[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 8-14.

图/表 4

图1 实验1流程图注：远处指实际程序中的远处空间，近处指实际程序中的近处空间；灰色方块表示占位符闪烁，以下同。

图2 目标出现在近处和远处空间时不同情绪面孔目标下的平均反应时和标准误

图3 实验2流程图

图4 目标出现在近处和远处空间时不同情绪面孔线索下的平均反应时和标准误

参考文献

	邓晓红, 张德玄, 黄诗雪, 袁雯, 周晓林. 阈上和阈下不同情绪线索对返回抑制的影响. 心理学报, 2010, 42 (3): 325- 333.
	龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉. 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25 (1): 40- 46. DOI
	王爱君, 李毕琴, 张明. 三维空间深度位置上基于空间的返回抑制. 心理学报, 2015, 47 (7): 859- 868.
	王爱君, 刘晓乐, 唐晓雨, 张明. 三维空间中不同视野深度位置上的返回抑制. 心理学报, 2017, 49 (6): 723- 732.
	王爱君, 张明. 三维空间中视觉空间返回抑制对Simon效应的影响. 心理科学, 2015, 38 (4): 792- 780.
	王敬欣, 贾丽萍, 白学军, 罗跃嘉. 返回抑制过程中情绪面孔加工优先: ERPs研究. 心理学报, 2013, 45 (1): 1- 10.
	吴晓刚, 施亮, 李乐源, 张炎炎, 潘发达. 返回抑制加工中情绪效应的分离. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24 (4): 588- 595.
	徐欣颖, 高湘萍. 自我威胁刺激对返回抑制的影响. 心理科学, 2017, 40 (2): 296- 302.
	Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. F.. Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics, 1993, 53 (6): 658- 667.
	Baijal, S., & Srinivasan, N.. Emotional and hemispheric asymmetries in shifts of attention: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 2011, 25 (2): 280- 294. DOI
	Berdica, E., Gerdes, A. B. M., & Alpers, G. W.. A comprehensive look at phobic fear in inhibition of return: Phobia-related spiders as cues and targets. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2017, 54, 158- 164. DOI
	Chao, H. F.. Inhibition of return to negative emotion: Evidence from an emotional expression detection task. Emotion, 2010, 10 (2): 272- 277. DOI
	Chen, Q., Weidner, R., Vossel, S., Weiss, P. H., & Fink, G. R.. Neural mechanisms of attentional reorienting in three-dimensional space. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2012, 32 (39): 13352- 13362. DOI
	Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W.. Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 2010, 30 (2): 203- 216. DOI
	Everaert, T., Spruyt, A., Rossi, V., Pourtois, G., & De Houwer, J.. Feature-specific attention allocation overrules the orienting response to emotional stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2014, 9 (9): 1351- 1359. DOI
	Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K.. Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2001, 130 (4): 681- 700. DOI
	Gobel, M. S., Tufft, M. R. A., & Richardson, D. C.. Social beliefs and visual attention: How the social relevance of a cue influences spatial orienting. Cognitive Science, 2017, 42, 161- 185.
	Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D.. Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54 (6): 917- 924. DOI
	Jia, L. P., Wang, J. X., Zhang, K., Ma, H. F., & Sun, H. J.. Do emotional faces affect inhibition of return? An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10, 721. DOI
	Maringelli, F., McCarthy, J., Steed, A., Slater, M., & Umiltà, C.. Shifting visuo-spatial attention in a virtual three-dimensional space. Cognitive Brain Research, 2001, 10 (3): 317- 322. DOI
	Nisbett, R. E.. Evolutionary psychology, biology, and cultural evolution. Motivation and Emotion, 1990, 14 (4): 255- 263. DOI
	Öhman, A., & Mineka, S.. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 2001, 108 (3): 483- 522. DOI
	Pérez-Dueñas, C., Acosta, A., & Lupiáñez, J.. Reduced habituation to angry faces: Increased attentional capture as to override inhibition of return. Psychological Research, 2014, 78 (2): 196- 208. DOI
	Pierce, A. M., Crouse, M. D., & Green, J. J.. Evidence for an attentional component of inhibition of return in visual search. Psychophysiology, 2017, 54 (11): 1676- 1685. DOI
	Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
	Quiñones-Camacho, L. E., Wu, R., & Davis, E. L.. Motivated attention to fear-related stimuli: Evidence for the enhanced processing of fear in the late positive potential. Motivation and Emotion, 2018, 42 (2): 299- 308. DOI
	Raz, S., Dan, O., & Zysberg, L.. Neural correlates of emotional intelligence in a visual emotional oddball task: An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 2014, 91, 79- 86. DOI
	Silvert, L., & Funes, M. J.. When do fearful faces override inhibition of return. Acta Psychologica, 2016, 163, 124- 134. DOI
	Stoyanova, R. S., Pratt, J., & Anderson, A. K.. Inhibition of return to social signals of fear. Emotion, 2007, 7 (1): 49- 56. DOI
	Taylor, T. L., & Therrien, M. E.. Inhibition of return for faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 2005, 67 (8): 1414- 1422.
	Theeuwes, J., & van der Stigchel, S.. Faces capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 2006, 13 (6): 657- 665. DOI
	Wang, A. J., Liu, X. L., Chen, Q., & Zhang, M. (2016). Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(3), 838–847.
	Wang, A. J., Yue, Z. Z., Zhang, M., & Chen, Q.. Interaction between spatial inhibition of return (IOR) and executive control in three-dimensional space. Experimental Brain Research, 2015, 233 (11): 3059- 3071. DOI
	Yuan, J. J., Tian, Y., Huang, X. T., Fan, H. Y., & Wei, X. M.. Emotional bias varies with stimulus type, arousal and task setting: Meta-analytic evidences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019, 107, 461- 472.

[1]	刘艳艳, 李杰, 赵起超, 陈贝贝, 张禹. 三维动静态场景下返回抑制的扩散[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 22-28.
[2]	高超, 李士一, 章鹏, 赵光. 基于双眼视差探讨深度知觉信息对背景线索效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 16-21,29.
[3]	任彧, 郝芳. 人际距离和情绪知觉对利他选择的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 321-326.
[4]	吴晓刚, 施亮, 李乐源, 潘发达. 内隐情绪加工对返回抑制效应的调节[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 619-625.
[5]	焦江丽,刘毅,闻素霞,马爱辉. 焦虑情绪状态下老年个体返回抑制成分的特征^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 162-166.
[6]	赵建宝，王勇慧. 任务类型对不同SOA条件下基于颜色重复劣势效应的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 454-461.
[7]	白学军；陈衍,3. 不同线索化条件下返回抑制时程年老化研究[J]. , 2012, 10(6): 401-406.
[8]	. 外框数目、线索数目和线索类型对返回抑制的影响[J]. , 2010, 8(3): 175-182.
[9]	付佳,张明. 返回抑制对空间Stroop效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(4): 265-268.
[10]	焦江丽,；王勇慧；边国栋4. 认知控制对基于位置和颜色返回抑制的影响[J]. , 2009, 7(1): 44-49.