人工智能自恋提升人机合作创新意愿及其机制

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

飞速发展的人工智能(AI)揭示了人机合作的必要性，但创新领域下的人机合作仍面临诸多阻碍，人工智能展现自恋特征或可解决这一困境。本研究通过两项仿真情境实验，操纵AI高/低自恋并检验其如何影响个体对AI的感知创造力、感知情绪能力以及人机合作创新意愿。结果发现：(1)AI自恋提升个体对AI的感知创造力、感知情绪能力与人机合作创新意愿；(2)个体对AI的感知创造力与感知情绪能力平行中介AI自恋与人机合作创新意愿的关系。研究结果展现了AI自恋的积极作用，为人机内部兼容性理论的亚成分结构提供实证支撑，为应用AI自恋特征助推人机合作创新提供实践指导。

关键词: 人工智能, 自恋, 人机合作创新意愿, 感知创造力, 感知情绪能力

Abstract:

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has underscored the necessity of human-agent collaboration. However, collaboration between humans and intelligent agents in the domain of innovation continues to encounter numerous challenges. AI exhibiting narcissistic traits may offer a solution to this dilemma. Two simulation experiments were conducted to manipulate AI with high/low narcissism and to examine how it influences individuals’ perceived creativity, perceived emotional capacity, and human-agent collaborative innovation willingness to AI. The results showed that: 1) AI narcissism enhanced individuals’ perceived creativity, perceived emotional capacity, and human-agent collaborative innovation willingness to AI. 2) Individuals’ perceived creativity and perceived emotional capacity parallelly mediated the relationship between AI narcissism and human-agent collaborative innovation willingness. The findings demonstrate the positive role of AI narcissism, which provides empirical support for the sub-component structure of human-agent inner compatibility theory, as well as offers practical guidance for utilizing AI narcissistic traits to promote human-agent collaborative innovation.

Key words: artificial intelligence, narcissism, human-agent collaborative innovation willingness, perceived creativity, perceived emotional capacity

中图分类号:

B849

白博仁, 周详, 张婧婧, 崔虞馨. 人工智能自恋提升人机合作创新意愿及其机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 137-144.

Boren BAI, Xiang ZHOU, Jingjing ZHANG, Yuxin CUI. Artificial Intelligence Narcissism Enhances Human-Agent Collaborative Innovation Willingness and Its Mechanisms[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 137-144.

图/表 7

参考文献

	贡喆, 刘昌, 沈汪兵, 王贤, 石荣. 信任对创造力的影响: 激发、抑制以及倒U假设. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25 (3): 463- 474.
	何贵兵, 陈诚, 何泽桐, 崔力丹, 陆嘉琦, 宣泓舟, 林琳. 智能组织中的人机协同决策: 基于人机内部兼容性的研究探索. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (12): 2619- 2627.
	任芬, 刘拓, 齐保莉, 徐绍恒, 凌钲程. 自恋双面性与行为系统的关系: 性别的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21 (1): 36- 42.
	谢莹, 葛若瑾, 张文海, 陈晓惠. 不同自恋类型大学生的日常情绪特征及调节方式. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2022, 36 (4): 344- 346. DOI
	许丽颖, 喻丰, 彭凯平. 算法歧视比人类歧视引起更少道德惩罚欲. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (9): 1076- 1092.
	许为, 葛列众. 智能时代的工程心理学. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28 (9): 1409- 1425.
	周详, 祖冲, 崔虞馨. (2023). 创造力与人工智能. 西安: 陕西师范大学出版总社.
	Abfalter, D.. Authenticity and respect: Leading creative teams in the performing arts. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2013, 22 (3): 295- 306. DOI
	Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M.. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 1981, 32, 439- 476. DOI
	Celik, I.. Exploring the determinants of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Digital divide, computational thinking, cognitive absorption. Telematics and Informatics, 2023, 83, 102026. DOI
	Coll, R., & Coll, J. H.. Cognitive match interface design, a base concept for guiding the development of user friendly computer application packages. Journal of Medical Systems, 1989, 13 (4): 227- 235. DOI
	Emmons, R. A.. Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52 (1): 11- 17. DOI
	Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L.. The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2013, 7 (3): 199- 216. DOI
	Goncalo, J. A., Flynn, F. J., & Kim, S. H.. Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2010, 36 (11): 1484- 1495. DOI
	Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R.. A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2011, 53 (5): 517- 527. DOI
	Harris-Watson, A. M., Larson, L. E., Lauharatanahirun, N., DeChurch, L. A., & Contractor, N. S.. Social perception in Human-AI teams: Warmth and competence predict receptivity to AI teammates. Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, 145, 107765. DOI
	Hitsuwari, J., Ueda, Y., Yun, W., & Nomura, M.. Does human-AI collaboration lead to more creative art? Aesthetic evaluation of human-made and AI-generated haiku poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, 139, 107502. DOI
	Hur, J. D., Koo, M., & Hofmann, W.. When temptations come alive: How anthropomorphism undermines self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 2015, 42 (2): 340- 358.
	Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 241–250.
	Lee, J., & Min, S. J.. The effects of repeated induction of emotions on cooperation and punishment. Economic Inquiry, 2021, 59 (3): 925- 943. DOI
	Malle, B. F. (2019). How many dimensions of mind perception really are there? In A. K. Goel, C. M. Seifert, & C. Freksa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2268–2274). Montreal, QB: Cognitive Science Society.
	Moruzzi, C. (2020). Should human artists fear AI?: A report on the perception of creative AI. In M. Verdicchio, M. Carvalhais, L. Ribas, & A. Rangel (Eds.), xCoAx 2020: The Eighth Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X (pp. 170–185). Porto, Portugal: Universidade do Porto.
	Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I.. Handshaking promotes deal-making by signaling cooperative intent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019, 116 (5): 743- 768. DOI
	Sedikides, C., Ntoumanis, N., & Sheldon, K. M.. I am the chosen one: Narcissism in the backdrop of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality, 2019, 87 (1): 70- 81. DOI
	Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M.. People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41 (1): 37- 55. DOI
	Sternberg, R. J., & Karami, S.. An 8P theoretical framework for understanding creativity and theories of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2022, 56 (1): 55- 78. DOI
	Thuillard, S., Adams, M., Jelmini, G., Schmutz, S., Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J.. When humans and computers induce social stress through negative feedback: Effects on performance and subjective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 2022, 133, 107270. DOI
	Wang, J., Suri, S., & Watts, D. J.. Cooperation and assortativity with dynamic partner updating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109 (36): 14363- 14368.

变量	1	2	3
1.AI自恋
2.感知创造力	0.23**
3.感知情绪能力	0.37***	0.13
4.人机合作创新意愿	0.29***	0.49***	0.38***

变量	1	2	3
1.AI自恋
2.感知创造力	0.23**
3.感知情绪能力	0.37***	0.13
4.人机合作创新意愿	0.29***	0.49***	0.38***

路径	Effect	SE	95%CI		占总效应比值(%)
路径	Effect	SE	下限	上限	占总效应比值(%)
AI自恋→人机合作创新意愿	1.08	0.29	0.51	1.66
直接效应	0.34	0.28	−0.22	0.90	31.5
总间接效应	0.74	0.21	0.37	1.20	68.5
AI自恋→感知创造力→人机合作创新意愿	0.34	0.15	0.09	0.66	31.5
AI自恋→感知情绪能力→人机合作创新意愿	0.40	0.14	0.16	0.70	37.0

路径	Effect	SE	95%CI		占总效应比值(%)
路径	Effect	SE	下限	上限	占总效应比值(%)
AI自恋→人机合作创新意愿	1.08	0.29	0.51	1.66
直接效应	0.34	0.28	−0.22	0.90	31.5
总间接效应	0.74	0.21	0.37	1.20	68.5
AI自恋→感知创造力→人机合作创新意愿	0.34	0.15	0.09	0.66	31.5
AI自恋→感知情绪能力→人机合作创新意愿	0.40	0.14	0.16	0.70	37.0

变量	1	2	3
1.AI自恋
2.感知创造力	0.26**
3.感知情绪能力	0.41***	0.13
4.人机合作创新意愿	0.40***	0.56***	0.48***