工作−家庭冲突与中小学教师工作繁荣的关系：基于多项式回归与响应面分析的探索

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.02.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

使用问卷法对2876名中小学教师进行调查，探讨工作−家庭冲突的双向对比情况与中小学教师工作繁荣的关系，以及心理资本在二者关系中的作用机制。结果发现：(1)当工作干扰家庭与家庭干扰工作水平一致时，与“低−低”干扰相比，“高−高”干扰的教师具有更低的工作繁荣水平和心理资本水平；(2)当工作干扰家庭与家庭干扰工作水平不一致时，与“高−低”干扰相比，“低−高”干扰的教师具有更低的工作繁荣水平和心理资本水平；(3)教师的心理资本在其工作−家庭冲突与工作繁荣的关系之间起部分中介作用。

关键词: 工作?家庭冲突, 工作繁荣, 心理资本, 响应面分析

Abstract:

Using questionnaire surveys, a study was conducted on 2876 primary and secondary school teachers to explore the relationship between bi-directional contrasting situations of work-family conflict and thriving at work of teachers, as well as the mechanism of psychological capital in the relationship. The results showed that: 1) when work interference with family and family interference with work were consistent, teachers experiencing “high-high” conflict demonstrated lower levels of thriving at work and psychological capital compared to those with “low-low” conflict; 2) when work interference with family and family interference with work were inconsistent, teachers experiencing “low-high” conflict demonstrated lower levels of thriving at work and psychological capital compared to those with “high-low” conflict; 3) teachers’ psychological capital partially mediated the relationship between their work-family conflict and thriving at work.

Key words: work-family conflict, thriving at work, psychological capital, response surface analysis

魏淑华, 孙慧慧, 丁合娟, 宋素波, 王荣. 工作−家庭冲突与中小学教师工作繁荣的关系：基于多项式回归与响应面分析的探索[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 266-273.

Shuhua WEI, Huihui SUN, Hejuan DING, Subo SONG, Rong WANG. The Relationship Between Primary and Secondary School Teachers’ Work-Family Conflict and Thriving at Work: An Exploration Based on Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Analysis[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 266-273.

图/表 5

参考文献 0

	陈耘, 赵富强, 罗奎, 张光磊. 工作−家庭关系对工作绩效的影响: 交叉观还是匹配观?——来自元分析的证据. 中国人力资源开发, 2017, (12): 73- 88.
	程利娜, 黄存良, 郑林科. 生活应激源对大学生抑郁的影响: 心理资本和应对方式的链式中介. 中国卫生事业管理, 2019, 36 (4): 289- 292.
	冯娅惠. (2017). 精神科医护人员工作家庭冲突、心理资本与职业倦怠关系研究(硕士学位论文). 河北师范大学, 石家庄.
	甘晴. (2015). 心理资本与工作家庭冲突的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 南昌大学.
	季健. (2021). 管理者视角下BNB银行员工工作−家庭冲突对其工作繁荣的影响(硕士学位论文). 浙江工商大学, 杭州.
	郎爽, 路晓琳, 刘倩倩, 刘丽丽. 血液透析护士工作家庭冲突与工作投入及心理资本的相关性. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34 (6): 84- 87.
	李明月, 张玉静. 公务员工作繁荣、心理健康及其对职业倦怠影响的实证研究. 科技与管理, 2017, 19 (6): 112- 120.
	李永占. 特殊教育教师工作家庭冲突对工作投入的影响: 情绪智力的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015a, 23 (6): 1106- 1111.
	李永占. 幼儿教师工作家庭冲突对工作投入的影响: 情绪智力的调节作用. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2015b, 33 (4): 80- 88.
	王倩. (2022). 中小学教师工作繁荣的影响因素与提高策略研究(硕士学位论文). 济南大学.
	吴江秋, 黄培伦, 严丹. 工作繁荣的产生及其对创新绩效的影响——来自广东省高科技企业的实证研究. 软科学, 2015, 29 (7): 110- 113.
	于泊明, 张兰霞, 杨硕, 李爽. 组织-员工工作家庭边界融合度匹配对员工工作幸福感及工作繁荣的影响. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43 (3): 448- 456.
	张建平, 林澍倩. 真实型领导、真实型追随影响工作繁荣和主动性行为的多层次研究. 工业经济论坛, 2018, 5 (5): 17- 33.
	张阔, 张赛, 董颖红. 积极心理资本: 测量及其与心理健康的关系. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8 (1): 58- 64.
	张文. (2010). 中小学教师心理资本问卷的编制及其特征分析(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
	Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. Mediated mechanism of thriving at work between perceived organization support, innovative work behavior and turnover intention. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 2015, 9 (3): 982- 998.
	Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. Promoting thriving at work and waning turnover intention: A relational perspective. Future Business Journal, 2016, 2 (2): 127- 137. DOI
	Ali, M., Lei, S., Jie, Z. S., & Rahman, M. A. Empowering leadership and employee performance: A mediating role of thriving at work. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 2018, 9 (2): 1- 14. DOI
	Bhalla, A., & Kang, L. S. Domain-specific and nonspecific outcomes of work-family interface: A study of Indian journalists. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 2019, 7 (2): 127- 142. DOI
	Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2000, 56 (2): 249- 276. DOI
	Dugan, A. G., Matthews, R. A., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2012). Understanding the roles of subjective and objective aspects of time in the work-family interface. Community, Work & Family, 15(2), 149–172.
	Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999, 77 (2): 85- 129. DOI
	Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65–78.
	Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10 (1): 76- 88. DOI
	Hobfoll, S. E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 1989, 44 (3): 513- 524. DOI
	Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, 5 (1): 103- 128. DOI
	Iqbal, Z. A., Abid, G., Arshad, M., Ashfaq, F., Athar, M. A., & Hassan, Q. (2021). Impact of authoritative and laissez-faire leadership on thriving at work: The moderating role of conscientiousness. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(3), 667–685.
	Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83 (2): 139- 149. DOI
	Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 2005, 58 (2): 281- 342. DOI
	Nohe, C., Meier, L. L., Sonntag, K., & Michel, A. The chicken or the egg? A meta-analysis of panel studies of the relationship between work-family conflict and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100 (2): 522- 536. DOI
	Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, 35 (3): 434- 446. DOI
	Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33 (2): 250- 275. DOI
	Pu, J., Hou, H. P., Ma, R. Y., & Sang, J. Y. The effect of psychological capital between work-family conflict and job burnout in Chinese university teachers: Testing for mediation and moderation. Journal of Health Psychology, 2017, 22 (14): 1799- 1807. DOI
	Ren, S., Babalola, M. T., Ogbonnaya, C., Hochwarter, W. A., Akemu, O., & Agyemang-Mintah, P. Employee thriving at work: The long reach of family incivility and family support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2022, 43 (1): 17- 35. DOI
	Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2010, 25 (4): 543- 554. DOI
	Utama, R. G., Wahyuningsih, R. S. H., & Surwanti, A. The influence of spiritual leadership on organizational citizenship behavior: Workplace spirituality and thriving at work as mediation. JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis: Teori dan Implementasi, 2023, 14 (2): 417- 435. DOI
	Wang, Y., Liu, L., Wang, J. N., & Wang, L. Work-family conflict and burnout among Chinese doctors: The mediating role of psychological capital. Journal of Occupational Health, 2012, 54 (3): 232- 240. DOI

变量	M±SD	1	2	3
1.工作干扰家庭	3.19±0.92
2.家庭干扰工作	2.43±0.96	0.66***
3.心理资本	4.80±0.64	−0.36***	−0.42***
4.工作繁荣	5.69±0.78	−0.27***	−0.34***	0.68***

变量	M±SD	1	2	3
1.工作干扰家庭	3.19±0.92
2.家庭干扰工作	2.43±0.96	0.66***
3.心理资本	4.80±0.64	−0.36***	−0.42***
4.工作繁荣	5.69±0.78	−0.27***	−0.34***	0.68***

	心理资本			工作繁荣
	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	M6	M7
性别	0.02	−0.02	−0.02	0.04	0.002	0.00	0.02
学段	−0.02	0.004	0.003	0.01	0.04*	0.04*	0.04*
年龄	0.004**	0.002	0.002	0.005**	0.004	0.003	0.002
婚姻	−0.01	0.03	0.03	−0.02	0.02	0.02	−0.003
X		−0.10***	0.02		−0.07**	0.18***	0.17***
Y		−0.22***	−0.28***		−0.24***	−0.41***	−0.20***
X²			−0.02			−0.08***	−0.07***
XY			0.10**			0.21***	0.14***
Y²			0.04*			0.005	−0.03
心理资本							0.78***
R²	0.003	0.19	0.23	0.003	0.12	0.16	0.48
ΔF	2.20	327.26***	46.11***	2.48*	197.79***	39.89***	1730.41***
ΔR²	0.003	0.19	0.04	0.003	0.12	0.04	0.32
X	(2.26, 0.63)			(1.91, 0.58)
Y	4.48			5.44
第一主轴斜率	−3.33[−15.90, 13.84]			−2.23[−4.50, −1.67]
第一主轴截距	1.75[1.12, 5.80]			1.47[1.07, 2.67]
第二主轴斜率	1.92[1.14, 2.48]			1.88[1.42, 2.89]
第二主轴截距	−0.57[−0.89, −0.17]			−0.68[−0.94, −0.38]
当X=Y时
斜率a₁=b₁+b₂	−0.27[−0.29, −0.23]			−0.23[−0.27, −0.20]
曲率a₂=b₃+b₄+b₅	0.13[0.10, 0.15]			0.14[0.11, 0.17]
当X=−Y时
斜率a₃=b₁−b₂	0.30[0.13, 0.48]			0.60[0.37, 0.82]
曲率a₄=b₃−b₄+b₅	−0.08[−0.24, 0.07]			−0.29[−0.51, −0.07]
Zat检验
Z₁−Z₂	−0.59[−0.65, −0.53]			−0.54[−0.61, −0.47]
Z₃−Z₄	0.61[0.30, 0.94]			1.19[0.76, 1.61]
侧移	1.94[−12.74, 16.76]			1.02[0.77, 2.42]

	心理资本			工作繁荣
	M1	M2	M3	M4	M5	M6	M7
性别	0.02	−0.02	−0.02	0.04	0.002	0.00	0.02
学段	−0.02	0.004	0.003	0.01	0.04*	0.04*	0.04*
年龄	0.004**	0.002	0.002	0.005**	0.004	0.003	0.002
婚姻	−0.01	0.03	0.03	−0.02	0.02	0.02	−0.003
X		−0.10***	0.02		−0.07**	0.18***	0.17***
Y		−0.22***	−0.28***		−0.24***	−0.41***	−0.20***
X²			−0.02			−0.08***	−0.07***
XY			0.10**			0.21***	0.14***
Y²			0.04*			0.005	−0.03
心理资本							0.78***
R²	0.003	0.19	0.23	0.003	0.12	0.16	0.48
ΔF	2.20	327.26***	46.11***	2.48*	197.79***	39.89***	1730.41***
ΔR²	0.003	0.19	0.04	0.003	0.12	0.04	0.32
X	(2.26, 0.63)			(1.91, 0.58)
Y	4.48			5.44
第一主轴斜率	−3.33[−15.90, 13.84]			−2.23[−4.50, −1.67]
第一主轴截距	1.75[1.12, 5.80]			1.47[1.07, 2.67]
第二主轴斜率	1.92[1.14, 2.48]			1.88[1.42, 2.89]
第二主轴截距	−0.57[−0.89, −0.17]			−0.68[−0.94, −0.38]
当X=Y时
斜率a₁=b₁+b₂	−0.27[−0.29, −0.23]			−0.23[−0.27, −0.20]
曲率a₂=b₃+b₄+b₅	0.13[0.10, 0.15]			0.14[0.11, 0.17]
当X=−Y时
斜率a₃=b₁−b₂	0.30[0.13, 0.48]			0.60[0.37, 0.82]
曲率a₄=b₃−b₄+b₅	−0.08[−0.24, 0.07]			−0.29[−0.51, −0.07]
Zat检验
Z₁−Z₂	−0.59[−0.65, −0.53]			−0.54[−0.61, −0.47]
Z₃−Z₄	0.61[0.30, 0.94]			1.19[0.76, 1.61]
侧移	1.94[−12.74, 16.76]			1.02[0.77, 2.42]

	系数	SE	95%CI
直接效应	0.23	0.04	[0.15, 0.30]
间接效应	0.77	0.03	[0.71, 0.84]