经济人信念的潜类别及其与自我去人性化的关系

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

职场工作者对自我人性的贬损认知，即自我去人性化，给企业和自身带来了诸多消极后果。尽管有研究发现了多种外部诱因，但哪类人群更易产生自我去人性化尚未可知。为此，本研究通过调查814名有工作经验的被试，探讨了经济人信念的不同亚群体，及其与经济角色优先性和自我去人性化的关系。结果表明，经济人信念可以区分出温和型、冷酷型、温情型和反向型四个亚群体。其中，冷酷型亚群体的自我去人性化水平最高，属于高危人群；温情型亚群体的自我去人性化水平最低，属于免疫人群。进一步中介分析显示，仅冷酷型亚群体通过经济角色优先性与自我去人性化相关联。概括而言，冷酷型亚群体是自我去人性化的高危人群且经济角色优先性是风险因素。

关键词: 经济人信念的潜类别, 经济角色优先性, 自我去人性化

Abstract:

The derogatory cognition of their own humanity by workplace workers, that is, self-dehumanization, has brought many negative consequences to both enterprises and themselves. Although many external inducements were found through previous research, it is still unknown which group of people is more prone to self-dehumanization. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between different subgroups of homo economicus beliefs, the priority of economic roles, and self-dehumanization by surveying 814 participants with work experience. The results indicated that homo economicus beliefs could be distinguished into four subgroups: moderate, cold, warm and reverse. Comparative analysis revealed that the cold subgroup exhibited the highest level of self-dehumanization, making them a high-risk group, while the warm subgroup showed the lowest level of self-dehumanization, qualifying them as an immune group. Further mediation analysis indicated that only the cold subgroup was associated with self-dehumanization through the priority of economic roles. In summary, the cold subgroup represents a high-risk group for self-dehumanization, and the priority of economic roles is a risk factor.

Key words: latent types of homo economicus beliefs, the priority of economic roles, self-dehumanization

刘晓飞, 辛自强. 经济人信念的潜类别及其与自我去人性化的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 682-689.

Xiaofei LIU, Ziqiang XIN. Latent Types of Homo Economicus Beliefs and the Relationship with Self-Dehumanization[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 682-689.

图/表 7

参考文献 0

	刘国芳, 辛自强. 经济人信念: 自利与理性的特点及其不同作用. 心理技术与应用, 2021, 9 (5): 257- 269.
	刘好, 郭睿, 于佳露, 徐丞谊, 郭子妍, 伍珍. 经济人信念影响捐赠意愿: 有调节的中介. 科学通报, 2023, 68 (33): 4556- 4569.
	孙钾诒, 刘衍玲. 去人性化知觉: 内涵、测量及相关研究. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37 (3): 447- 456.
	孙晋. 习近平关于市场公平竞争重要论述的经济法解读. 法学评论, 2020, 38 (1): 1- 13.
	孙笑然, 俞伟哲, 王楠楠. 内卷是组织中创新的驱动力吗——职场内卷的再定义及其对多层次创新的作用效应. 领导科学, 2023, (2): 78- 81. DOI
	辛自强. 理性的达成: 社会治理心理学的思考. 中州学刊, 2020, (3): 7- 13. DOI
	亚当·斯密. (2005). 国富论 (唐日松译). 北京: 华夏出版社.
	Andrighetto, L., Baldissarri, C., Gabbiadini, A., Sacino, A., Valtorta, R. R., & Volpato, C. Objectified conformity: Working self-objectification increases conforming behavior. Social Influence, 2018, 13 (2): 78- 90. DOI
	Baldissarri, C., & Andrighetto, L. Being treated as an instrument: Consequences of instrumental treatment and self-objectification on task engagement and performance. Human Performance, 2021, 34 (2): 85- 106. DOI
	Baldissarri, C., Andrighetto, L., Gabbiadini, A., & Volpato, C. Work and freedom? Working self-objectification and belief in personal free will. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2017, 56 (2): 250- 269. DOI
	Baldissarri, C., Pagliaro, S., Teresi, M., & Andrighetto, L. Humanness in times of uncertainty: On the link between perceived job insecurity, self-objectification and well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2023, 53 (1): 195- 211. DOI
	Bastian, B., Jetten, J., & Radke, H. R. M. Cyber-dehumanization: Violent video game play diminishes our humanity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48 (2): 486- 491. DOI
	Bieliński, J., & Hövermann, A. Perceived marketization in Poland: Translating key concepts of institutional anomie theory to the micro level. European Journal of Criminology, 2023, 20 (1): 20- 42. DOI
	Bouckenooghe, D., De Clercq, D., & Raja, U. A person-centered, latent profile analysis of psychological capital. Australian Journal of Management, 2019, 44 (1): 91- 108. DOI
	Boudjemadi, V., Demoulin, S., & Bastart, J. Animalistic dehumanization of older people by younger ones: Variations of humanness perceptions as a function of a target’s age. Psychology and Aging, 2017, 32 (3): 293- 306. DOI
	Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
	Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, B. A. L., Culotta, C. M., & DiTomasso, N. A. The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2014, 106 (4): 526- 545. DOI
	Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91 (3): 481- 510. DOI
	Haslam, N. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006, 10 (3): 252- 264. DOI
	Haslam, N. Dehumanization and the lack of social connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2022, 43, 312- 316. DOI
	Karantzas, G. C., Simpson, J. A., & Pizzirani, B. The loss of humanness in close relationships: An interpersonal model of dehumanization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2022, 46, 101317. DOI
	Kronfeldner, M. (2021). The Routledge handbook of dehumanization. London: Routledge.
	Kuljian, O. R., & Hohman, Z. P. Warmth, competence, and subtle dehumanization: Comparing clustering patterns of warmth and competence with animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2023, 62 (1): 181- 196. DOI
	Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32 (5): 689- 725. DOI
	Nguyen, N., Maurage, P., & Stinglhamber, F. Organizational metadehumanization and mechanistic self-dehumanization: The role of surface acting. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2022, 25 (8): 1983- 2002.
	Ruttan, R. L., & Lucas, B. J. Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2018, 149, 47- 58. DOI
	Sainz, M., & Baldissarri, C. Abusive leadership versus objectifying job features: Factors that influence organizational dehumanization and workers’ self-objectification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2021, 51 (8): 825- 837. DOI
	Teng, F., Chen, Z. S., Poon, K. T., Zhang, D. H., & Jiang, Y. W. Money and relationships: When and why thinking about money leads people to approach others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2016, 137, 58- 70. DOI
	Wang, X. J., & Krumhuber, E. G. The love of money results in objectification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2017, 56 (2): 354- 372. DOI
	Xin, Z. Q., & Liu, G. F. Homo economicus belief inhibits trust. PLoS One, 2013, 8 (10): e76671. DOI

变量	M±SD	r		Partial r
变量	M±SD	性别	年龄	1	2	3
1.自利	3.39±1.21	0.09*	–0.03
2.理性	4.48±1.08	–0.04	0.07*	0.30***
3.经济角色优先性	2.62±0.84	–0.11**	0.28***	0.12***	0.10**
4.自我去人性化	3.24±0.86	0.10**	–0.19***	0.21***	–0.09**	0.14***

变量	M±SD	r		Partial r
变量	M±SD	性别	年龄	1	2	3
1.自利	3.39±1.21	0.09*	–0.03
2.理性	4.48±1.08	–0.04	0.07*	0.30***
3.经济角色优先性	2.62±0.84	–0.11**	0.28***	0.12***	0.10**
4.自我去人性化	3.24±0.86	0.10**	–0.19***	0.21***	–0.09**	0.14***

模型	AIC	BIC	aBIC	Entropy	LMR(p)	BLRT(p)	潜在类别比例
1	5064.93	5083.74	5071.03
2	4834.06	4866.97	4844.74	0.96	<0.001	<0.001	0.06; 0.94
3	4796.09	4843.11	4811.35	0.76	<0.001	<0.001	0.06; 0.49; 0.45
4	4723.27	4784.39	4743.11	0.81	<0.001	<0.001	0.05; 0.61; 0.16; 0.18
5	4696.78	4772.01	4721.20	0.79	0.011	<0.001	0.14; 0.03; 0.04; 0.55; 0.24

模型	AIC	BIC	aBIC	Entropy	LMR(p)	BLRT(p)	潜在类别比例
1	5064.93	5083.74	5071.03
2	4834.06	4866.97	4844.74	0.96	<0.001	<0.001	0.06; 0.94
3	4796.09	4843.11	4811.35	0.76	<0.001	<0.001	0.06; 0.49; 0.45
4	4723.27	4784.39	4743.11	0.81	<0.001	<0.001	0.05; 0.61; 0.16; 0.18
5	4696.78	4772.01	4721.20	0.79	0.011	<0.001	0.14; 0.03; 0.04; 0.55; 0.24

经济人信念潜类别比较		经济角色优先性		自我去人性化
经济人信念潜类别比较		M±SD	χ²	M±SD	χ²
Overall test			11.30*		25.44***
1(反向型)	1 vs. 2	2.34±0.18	1.44	3.23±0.15	0.10
	1 vs. 3		2.83†		4.68*
	1 vs. 4		6.87**		2.00
2(温和型)	2 vs. 3	2.56±0.04	1.32	3.28±0.04	15.25***
2(温和型)	2 vs. 4	2.56±0.04	8.61**	3.28±0.04	3.80†
3(温情型)	3 vs. 4	2.67±0.08	2.33	2.84±0.10	24.73***
4(冷酷型)		2.85±0.09		3.47±0.08