经济人信念的潜类别及其与自我去人性化的关系

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 职场工作者对自我人性的贬损认知，即自我去人性化，给企业和自身带来了诸多消极后果。尽管有研究发现了多种外部诱因，但哪类人群更易产生自我去人性化尚未可知。为此，本研究通过调查814名有工作经验的被试，探讨了经济人信念的不同亚群体，及其与经济角色优先性和自我去人性化的关系。结果表明，经济人信念可以区分出温和型、冷酷型、温情型和反向型四个亚群体。其中，冷酷型亚群体的自我去人性化水平最高，属于高危人群；温情型亚群体的自我去人性化水平最低，属于免疫人群。进一步中介分析显示，仅冷酷型亚群体通过经济角色优先性与自我去人性化相关联。概括而言，冷酷型亚群体是自我去人性化的高危人群且经济角色优先性是风险因素。

关键词: 经济人信念的潜类别, 经济角色优先性, 自我去人性化

Abstract: The derogatory cognition of their own humanity by workplace workers, that is, self-dehumanization, has brought many negative consequences to both enterprises and themselves. Although many external inducements were found through previous research, it is still unknown which group of people is more prone to self-dehumanization. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between different subgroups of homo economicus beliefs, the priority of economic roles, and self-dehumanization by surveying 814 participants with work experience. The results indicated that homo economicus beliefs could be distinguished into four subgroups: moderate, cold, warm and reverse. Comparative analysis revealed that the cold subgroup exhibited the highest level of self-dehumanization, making them a high-risk group, while the warm subgroup showed the lowest level of self-dehumanization, qualifying them as an immune group. Further mediation analysis indicated that only the cold subgroup was associated with self-dehumanization through the priority of economic roles. In summary, the cold subgroup represents a high-risk group for self-dehumanization, and the priority of economic roles is a risk factor.

Key words: latent types of homo economicus beliefs, the priority of economic roles, self-dehumanization

中图分类号:

B849

刘晓飞, 辛自强. 经济人信念的潜类别及其与自我去人性化的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 682-689.

LIU Xiaofei, XIN Ziqiang. Latent Types of Homo Economicus Beliefs and the Relationship with Self-Dehumanization[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 682-689.

参考文献

刘国芳, 辛自强. (2021). 经济人信念: 自利与理性的特点及其不同作用. 心理技术与应用, 9(5), 257–269.
刘好, 郭睿, 于佳露, 徐丞谊, 郭子妍, 伍珍. (2023). 经济人信念影响捐赠意愿: 有调节的中介. 科学通报, 68(33), 4556–4569.
孙钾诒, 刘衍玲. (2021). 去人性化知觉: 内涵、测量及相关研究. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 447–456.
孙晋. (2020). 习近平关于市场公平竞争重要论述的经济法解读. 法学评论, 38(1), 1–13.
孙笑然, 俞伟哲, 王楠楠. (2023). 内卷是组织中创新的驱动力吗——职场内卷的再定义及其对多层次创新的作用效应. 领导科学, (2), 78–81.
辛自强. (2020). 理性的达成: 社会治理心理学的思考. 中州学刊, (3), 7–13.
亚当·斯密. (2005). 国富论 (唐日松译). 北京: 华夏出版社.
Andrighetto, L., Baldissarri, C., Gabbiadini, A., Sacino, A., Valtorta, R. R., & Volpato, C. (2018). Objectified conformity: Working self-objectification increases conforming behavior. Social Influence, 13(2), 78–90.
Baldissarri, C., & Andrighetto, L. (2021). Being treated as an instrument: Consequences of instrumental treatment and self-objectification on task engagement and performance. Human Performance, 34(2), 85–106.
Baldissarri, C., Andrighetto, L., Gabbiadini, A., & Volpato, C. (2017). Work and freedom? Working self-objectification and belief in personal free will. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 250–269.
Baldissarri, C., Pagliaro, S., Teresi, M., & Andrighetto, L. (2023). Humanness in times of uncertainty: On the link between perceived job insecurity, self-objectification and well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 195–211.
Bastian, B., Jetten, J., & Radke, H. R. M. (2012). Cyber-dehumanization: Violent video game play diminishes our humanity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 486–491.
Bieliński, J., & Hövermann, A. (2023). Perceived marketization in Poland: Translating key concepts of institutional anomie theory to the micro level. European Journal of Criminology, 20(1), 20–42.
Bouckenooghe, D., De Clercq, D., & Raja, U. (2019). A person-centered, latent profile analysis of psychological capital. Australian Journal of Management, 44(1), 91–108.
Boudjemadi, V., Demoulin, S., & Bastart, J. (2017). Animalistic dehumanization of older people by younger ones: Variations of humanness perceptions as a function of a target’s age. Psychology and Aging, 32(3), 293–306.
Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, B. A. L., Culotta, C. M., & DiTomasso, N. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526–545.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.
Haslam, N. (2022). Dehumanization and the lack of social connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 312–316.
Karantzas, G. C., Simpson, J. A., & Pizzirani, B. (2022). The loss of humanness in close relationships: An interpersonal model of dehumanization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101317.
Kronfeldner, M. (2021). The Routledge handbook of dehumanization. London: Routledge.
Kuljian, O. R., & Hohman, Z. P. (2023). Warmth, competence, and subtle dehumanization: Comparing clustering patterns of warmth and competence with animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1), 181–196.
Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689–725.
Nguyen, N., Maurage, P., & Stinglhamber, F. (2022). Organizational metadehumanization and mechanistic self-dehumanization: The role of surface acting. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(8), 1983–2002.
Ruttan, R. L., & Lucas, B. J. (2018). Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 47–58.
Sainz, M., & Baldissarri, C. (2021). Abusive leadership versus objectifying job features: Factors that influence organizational dehumanization and workers’ self-objectification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(8), 825–837.
Teng, F., Chen, Z. S., Poon, K. T., Zhang, D. H., & Jiang, Y. W. (2016). Money and relationships: When and why thinking about money leads people to approach others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 58–70.
Wang, X. J., & Krumhuber, E. G. (2017). The love of money results in objectification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 354–372.
Xin, Z. Q., & Liu, G. F. (2013). Homo economicus belief inhibits trust. PLoS One, 8(10), e76671.

[1]	金花, 王超, 阴晓娟, 贾丽娜, 王旭英. 信息效价对错误信息持续影响效应的影响：错误信息信念的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 690-696.
[2]	阮玲玲, 师艺菁, 孟雯超, 张一凡, 史少佳, 杨群. 教师能力增长观对其课堂目标结构的预测—积极心理资本的中介机制和情绪的调节效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 697-703.
[3]	成子涵, 毕翠华, 吴琪. 未来情景思维对金钱跨期决策的影响—来自三水平元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 704-712.
[4]	杭宁, 管健. 群体身份变换对群体认同、群际态度的影响：基于认知一致性的再分类模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 713-720.
[5]	白博仁, 周详, 张婧婧, 崔虞馨. 人工智能自恋提升人机合作创新意愿及其机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 137-144.
[6]	支慧晶, 刘阳. 竞走裁判员在多人情景下判罚决策的视觉搜索特征[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 130-136.
[7]	张耀华, 徐敏, 黄云云, 辛素飞. 心理韧性缓冲压力生活事件与青少年学业倦怠之间的非线性关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 123-129.
[8]	史滋福, 陈火红, 张艺瀚, 管锦亮, 夏笔奇, 靳紫阳. 父母直升机教养对大学生主观幸福感的影响：自我控制和抑郁的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 116-122.
[9]	王兴超, 田芳芳. 儿童期虐待与欺负行为：青少年道德推脱与父亲道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 108-115.
[10]	韩迎春, 王琳萱. 有氧运动、情绪与创造力：流体智力的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 100-107.
[11]	林祟德. “教育家精神”也是中国心理学家精神之追求[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 721-724.
[12]	张克, 杜秀敏, 李立言, 张雪寒, 赵海霞. 酸味与创造力的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 815-823.
[13]	闫景蕾, 傅苗苗, 黄贝, 连帅磊. 问题性社交媒介使用与主观幸福感的关系：技术冲突和疲惫感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 824-831.
[14]	吴明证, 陈迪, 严梦瑶, 倪苏杭, 王士祺, 尹金荣, 孙晓玲. 家庭仪式与青少年自我控制的关系：亲子依恋与生命意义感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 832-838.
[15]	占友龙, 江雪芬, 刘长林, 刘旭, 谭千保. 大学生自我担当对道德困境下亲社会行为意愿的影响：自我效能感和预期自豪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 839-845.