睡眠质量在负性情绪粒度与日常生活满意度间的中介作用：来自经验取样法的证据

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.05.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究探讨了负性情绪粒度对个体日常生活满意度的影响以及睡眠质量的中介作用。采用经验取样法对198名大学生进行了连续7天的动态跟踪，每天进行8次情绪状态测评以评估情绪粒度，同时测量前一天晚上的睡眠质量和当天的生活满意度。多层结构方程模型分析结果发现：(1)在个体间水平上，负性情绪粒度显著正向预测睡眠质量和日常生活满意度；在个体内水平上，前一天晚上的睡眠质量显著正向预测当天的生活满意度；(2)睡眠质量在负性情绪粒度与日常生活满意度间具有中介作用。研究结果提示，未来通过情绪管理训练帮助个体更好地识别和表达负性情绪，可成为改善睡眠质量和生活满意度的潜在途径。

关键词: 负性情绪粒度, 睡眠质量, 日常生活满意度, 经验取样法

Abstract:

This study explored the impact of negative emotional granularity on daily life satisfaction and the mediating role of sleep quality. By using the experience sampling method, 198 college students were tracked for 7 consecutive days. Participants’ mood states were assessed 8 times daily to measure negative emotional granularity. Additionally, they reported their sleep quality from the previous night and their daily life satisfaction each day. Multilevel structural equation modeling showed that: 1) at the interindividual level, negative emotional granularity positively predicted both sleep quality and daily life satisfaction; furthermore, sleep quality of the previous night positively predicted daily life satisfaction at the intraindividual level; 2) sleep quality mediated the relationship between negative emotional granularity and daily life satisfaction. These findings indicate that emotion regulation training programs designed to enhance negative emotion differentiation abilities may represent a promising intervention for improving both sleep quality and daily life satisfaction.

Key words: negative emotional granularity, sleep quality, daily life satisfaction, experience sampling method

任思梦, 张珊珊, 曾翠莲, 包俊俊, 章晨阳. 睡眠质量在负性情绪粒度与日常生活满意度间的中介作用：来自经验取样法的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(5): 678-684.

Simeng REN, Shanshan ZHANG, Cuilian ZENG, Junjun BAO, Chenyang ZHANG. The Mediating Role of Sleep Quality Between Negative Emotional Granularity and Daily Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Experience Sampling Method[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(5): 678-684.

图/表 4

参考文献 0

	贺建风, 付永超, 熊健. 基于分层贝叶斯广义线性模型的小域估计方法研究. 数理统计与管理, 2019, 38 (2): 247- 260.
	康佳静, 姚满团, 张帆. 大学生数字压力与生活满意度的关系: 情绪调节的中介作用. 心理月刊, 2024, 19 (14): 80- 82, 106.
	林瑶, 张宝山, 徐冉, 张何雅婷. 老年人睡眠质量与家人沟通质量的关系及其影响机制. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39 (2): 200- 209.
	田昊, 王晓刚, 程科, 丁薇, 杨必宇, 谢雨欣. 青少年生命意义感对生活满意度的影响——生命态度、积极情感和消极情感的链式中介作用. 中国卫生事业管理, 2025, 42 (4): 462- 466.
	王淑霞, 程科, 卢金鑫. 消防员生活满意度在心理弹性和抑郁间的关系. 职业与健康, 2024, 40 (6): 806- 809.
	吴旻, 宋文琦, 鞠佳雯. 父母粗暴养育与儿童睡眠质量的关系: 核心自我评价和消极情绪的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21 (3): 344- 351.
	熊中敏, 郭怀宇, 吴月欣. 缺失数据处理方法研究综述. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57 (14): 27- 38.
	叶娜, 王磊, 张陆, 孙晓军. 自我控制在身体活动与大学生睡眠质量间的中介作用: 来自日志法的证据. 应用心理学, 2023, 29 (1): 89- 96.
	叶伟豪, 于美琪, 张利会, 高琪, 傅明珠, 卢家楣. 精准的意义: 负性情绪粒度的作用机制与干预. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31 (6): 1030- 1043.
	余乐华, 王文慧, 毕美仙. 睡眠质量与感知压力在护理学专业大学生正念主体性与生活满意度关系中的链式中介作用. 职业与健康, 2022, 38 (17): 2405- 2409.
	张珊珊, 王婧怡, 李昱汝. 情绪自旋及其心理健康功能. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29 (8): 1430- 1437.
	张银普, 骆南峰, 石伟. 经验取样法——一种收集“真实”数据的新方法. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24 (2): 305- 316.
	Barrett, L. F. Feelings or words? Understanding the content in self-report ratings of experienced emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 87 (2): 266- 281. DOI
	Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 2001, 15 (6): 713- 724. DOI
	Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1999, 8 (1): 10- 14. DOI
	Cao, Y. H., Yang, Z., Yu, Y. B., & Huang, X. Physical activity, sleep quality and life satisfaction in adolescents: A cross-sectional survey study. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022, 10, 1010194. DOI
	Catrone, C. An integrated treatment of psychosomatic symptoms and disorders of the self: The role of alexithymia. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 2021, 28 (1): 25- 42. DOI
	Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 2013, 112 (3): 497- 527. DOI
	Erbas, Y., Ceulemans, E., Elisabeth, S. B., Sels, L., Fischer, A., & Kuppens, P. Emotion differentiation dissected: Between-category, within-category, and integral emotion differentiation, and their relation to well-being. Cognition and Emotion, 2019, 33 (2): 258- 271. DOI
	Fabbri, M., Beracci, A., Martoni, M., Meneo, D., Tonetti, L., & Natale, V. Measuring subjective sleep quality: A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18 (3): 1082.
	Gruber, J., Kogan, A., Quoidbach, J., & Mauss, I. B. Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health. Emotion, 2013, 13 (1): 1- 6. DOI
	Heller, D., Watson, D., & Ilies, R. The dynamic process of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 2006, 74 (5): 1421- 1450. DOI
	Hülsheger, U. R., Lang, J. W. B., Depenbrock, F., Fehrmann, C., Zijlstra, F. R. H., & Alberts, H. J. E. M. The power of presence: The role of mindfulness at work for daily levels and change trajectories of psychological detachment and sleep quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014, 99 (6): 1113- 1128. DOI
	Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J., & Macrae, C. N. Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2014, 18 (3): 127- 133. DOI
	Israelashvili, J., Oosterwijk, S., Sauter, D., & Fischer, A. Knowing me, knowing you: Emotion differentiation in oneself is associated with recognition of others’ emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 2019, 33 (7): 1461- 1471. DOI
	Lennarz, H. K., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Timmerman, M. E., & Granic, I. Emotion differentiation and its relation with emotional well-being in adolescents. Cognition and Emotion, 2018, 32 (3): 651- 657. DOI
	Lischetzke, T., Schemer, L., Glombiewski, J. A., In-Albon, T., Karbach, J., & Könen, T. Negative emotion differentiation attenuates the within-person indirect effect of daily stress on nightly sleep quality through calmness. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12, 684117. DOI
	Nelson, K. L., Davis, J. E., & Corbett, C. F. Sleep quality: An evolutionary concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 2022, 57 (1): 144- 151. DOI
	Ottenstein, C., & Lischetzke, T. Development of a novel method of emotion differentiation that uses open-ended descriptions of momentary affective states. Assessment, 2020, 27 (8): 1928- 1945. DOI
	Palmer, C. A., Bower, J. L., Cho, K. W., Clementi, M. A., Lau, S., Oosterhoff, B., & Alfano, C. A. Sleep loss and emotion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 50 years of experimental research. Psychological Bulletin, 2024, 150 (4): 440- 463. DOI
	Pond, R. S., Jr., Kashdan, T. B., DeWall, C. N., Savostyanova, A., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. Emotion differentiation moderates aggressive tendencies in angry people: A daily diary analysis. Emotion, 2012, 12 (2): 326- 337. DOI
	Samman, E. Psychological and subjective well-being: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 2007, 35 (4): 459- 486. DOI
	Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Los Angeles: Sage.
	Scott, A. J., Webb, T. L., Martyn-St James, M., Rowse, G., & Weich, S. Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2021, 60, 101556. DOI
	Smidt, K. E., & Suvak, M. K. A brief, but nuanced, review of emotional granularity and emotion differentiation research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2015, 3, 48- 51. DOI
	Starr, L. R., Hershenberg, R., Li, Y. I., & Shaw, Z. A. When feelings lack precision: Low positive and negative emotion differentiation and depressive symptoms in daily life. Clinical Psychological Science, 2017, 5 (4): 613- 631. DOI
	Starr, L. R., Hershenberg, R., Shaw, Z. A., Li, Y. I., & Santee, A. C. The perils of murky emotions: Emotion differentiation moderates the prospective relationship between naturalistic stress exposure and adolescent depression. Emotion, 2020, 20 (6): 927- 938. DOI
	Willroth, E. C., Gatchpazian, A., Thai, S., Lassetter, B., Feinberg, M., & Ford, B. Q. The insulating function of sleep for well-being: Daily sleep quality attenuates the link between current affect and global life satisfaction. Affective Science, 2022, 3 (2): 318- 329. DOI
	Willroth, E. C., John, O. P., Biesanz, J. C., & Mauss, I. B. Understanding short-term variability in life satisfaction: The individual differences in evaluating life satisfaction (IDELS) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2020, 119 (1): 229- 248. DOI
	Xiao, Y., Wang, P. J., & Liu, H. Y. (2023). Assessing intra- and inter-individual reliabilities in intensive longitudinal studies: A two-level random dynamic model-based approach. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000608
	Zeinalhajlou, A., Alizadeh, M., Sahebihagh, M., Mohammadpoorasl, A., & Matlabi, H. Life satisfaction and its contributors among noninstitutionalized older people in Tabriz, Islamic Republic of Iran. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 2020, 26 (4): 410- 416. DOI

	M	SD	1	2	3
1.负性情绪粒度	−0.85	0.48		0.15*	0.17*
2.睡眠质量	3.56	0.69	0.10**		0.48**
3.日常生活满意度	3.67	0.61	0.12**	0.26**

	M	SD	1	2	3
1.负性情绪粒度	−0.85	0.48		0.15*	0.17*
2.睡眠质量	3.56	0.69	0.10**		0.48**
3.日常生活满意度	3.67	0.61	0.12**	0.26**

	个体内方差 (e²)	个体间方差 (r²)	个体内方差百分比 (%)
睡眠质量	0.50	0.39	56.18
日常生活满意度	0.48	0.31	60.76

	个体内方差 (e²)	个体间方差 (r²)	个体内方差百分比 (%)
睡眠质量	0.50	0.39	56.18
日常生活满意度	0.48	0.31	60.76

	日常生活满意度(c)			睡眠质量(a)			日常生活满意度(b/c’)
	β	SE	95%CI	β	SE	95%CI	β	SE	95%CI
个体内效应
睡眠质量							0.07*	0.03	[0.01, 0.13]
个体间效应
负性情绪粒度	0.22**	0.09	[0.05, 0.40]	0.36***	0.05	[0.25, 0.47]	0.12	0.08	[−0.04, 0.28]
睡眠质量							0.45***	0.05	[0.36, 0.56]
中介效应值及其检验
a_Bb_B							0.16***	0.03	[0.11, 0.23]
R²_within								0.05
R²_between		0.03			0.03			0.33