面孔再认能力性别差异的实验研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 18-22.

面孔再认能力性别差异的实验研究

吕勇, 于乐, 刘亚平

天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074

收稿日期:2009-11-04 出版日期:2010-03-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
作者简介:吕勇,男,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院教授,博士。Email：ly6312@163.com。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家社科基金”十一五“规划（教育学科）国家重点课题ABA060004项目、全国高等学校优秀博士论文作者专项资金200708项目和教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地05JJDXLX003重大项目的资助

STUDIES ON GENDER DIFFERENCES IN FACE RECOGNITION ABILITY

Lu Yong,Yu Le,Liu Yaping

Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Received:2009-11-04 Online:2010-03-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用“学习—再认”范式,以有或无外部特征的不同性别面孔照片为材料,研究面孔记忆的性别差异,结果表明：（1）有外部特征时,女性被试对不同性别面孔的记忆成绩均好于男性被试;无外部特征时,女性被试与男性被试的记忆成绩不存在性别差异;（2）比起男性照片,女性可记忆更多的女性照片,表明女性在面孔记忆中存在自我性别偏见;男性也是可记忆更多的女性照片,存在反向的性别偏向;（3）无论被试性别和照片性别,均是有外部特征的面孔照片的记忆效果更好;有外部特征的情况下,女性的自我性别偏见更明显。

关键词: 面孔加工, 性别差异, 自我性别偏见, 记忆能力

Abstract: Based on the ″Learning-recognition″ paradigm, we used different gender face photos which were with or without external features as materials to study the gender differences in face recognition. The results indicated:(1)When photos with external features, females remember more faces than males. But when photos were without external features, females remembered as many faces as males did.(2)Females remembered more female photos than male photos were which showed the female own gender bias. Males also remembered more female photos than male photos which showed the existence of reverse gender favor.(3)Regardless of subjects′ sex and photo gender, the memory perfermance of photos with external features was better than photos without external features. With the external features, the females significant had more own gender bias.

Key words: face processing, gender differences, own gender bias, memory ability

中图分类号:

B842.1

吕勇, 于乐, 刘亚平. 面孔再认能力性别差异的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 18-22.

Lu Yong,Yu Le,Liu Yaping. STUDIES ON GENDER DIFFERENCES IN FACE RECOGNITION ABILITY[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(1): 18-22.

参考文献

1 丁小丽, 邰发道. 记忆的年龄及性别差异. 陕西师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2003, 2: 219-222
2 朱滢, 张力. 自我记忆效应的实验研究. 中国科学, C辑, 2001, 31(6): 537-543
3 杨红升, 黄希庭. 面孔识别异族效应的研究. 心理科学, 2008, 31(6): 1450-1453
4 Meissner C A, Brigham J C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2001, 7(1): 3-35
5 Wiese H, Stefan R S, Kerstin H. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory. Neuropsychologia, 2008, 46(12): 2973-2985
6 Jenny R, Agneta H. Women remember more faces than men do. Acta Psychologica, 2007, 124(3): 344-355
7 Daniel B W, Benjamin S. An own gender bias and the improtance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 2003, 114(1): 101-114
8 Shaw J I, Skolnick P. Sex differences, weapon focus, and eyewitness reliability. Journal of Social Psychology, 1994, 134(4): 413-420
9 Alessandro C, Davide B, Ferdinando S. Sex Differences in Face Gender Recognition in Humans. Brain Research Bulletin, 2004, 63(6): 443-449
10 Lewin C, Herlitz A. Sex differences in face recognition-women′s faces make the difference. Brain Cognition, 2002, 50(1): 121-128
11 秦速励, 沈政. 面孔识别的“特殊性”. 心理科学, 2001, 24(5): 604-605
12杜英春, 吕勇. 面孔加工特异性的事件相关电位研究. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(4): 268-274
13彭小虎, 罗跃嘉, 魏景汉, 等. 面孔内外特征对东西方面孔识别影响的ERP研究. 航天医学与医学工程, 2003, 16(2): 123-127
14McKelvie S J. Sex differences in memory for faces. The Journal of Psychology, 1981, 107: 109-125
15Jennifer C, Simon B C, Sally W, et al. Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 2001, 23(1): 113-118
16Svetlana L, Simon B C, Peter R. Foetal testosterone and eye contact in 12-month-old human infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 2002, 25(3): 327-335
17Deblieck C, Zaidel D W. Hemi-field Memory for Attractiveness. International Journal of Neuroscience, 2003, 113(7): 931-941
18Lippa R. Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(4): 996-1009
19Jenny R.The Role of Gender in Face Recognition. Sweden: Stockholm University, 2007
20Olson I R, Marshuetz C. Facial Attractiveness is Appraised in a Glance. Emotion, 2005, 5(4): 498-502
21Valentine T, Endo M. Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1992, 44(4): 671-703
22Levin, D T. Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 2000, 129(4): 559-574
23Michel C, Rossion B, Han J, et al. Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one′s own race. Psychological Science, 2006, 17(7): 608-615

[1]	金花, 严世振, 单金磊, 刘婷. 面孔生命性加工的时间进程：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 577-584.
[2]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[3]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[4]	郭庆童, 徐铭雪, 许春艳, 刘秀丽. 大学生宿舍人际关系困扰与手机成瘾的关系：序列中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[5]	赵悦彤, 孙晓娟, 白倩, 张向葵. 空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 289-296.
[6]	魏淑华, 赵健, 董及美, 陈功香. 工作对家庭的增益与中小学教师的工作满意度：职业认同的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 125-130,136.
[7]	贺荟中, 张云翔. 信息类型和位置对儿童不同时期面孔加工的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 741-748.
[8]	张振, 齐春辉, 付淑英, 王青春, 熊建萍. 社会距离和性别对公平关注的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 100-106.
[9]	李甜甜, 吕勇. 面部表情觉知阈限的测量及其年龄和性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 771-777.
[10]	兰晓芳,张锦坤. 负面评价恐惧的性别差异：基于内隐和外显测量的比较[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 25-30.
[11]	李悠, 江信文, 王飞雪. 性别及控制感对中国大学生信任行为的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 847-850.
[12]	姚昭；王振宏；雷榕3. 词—面孔任务中的情绪效价冲突效应及性别差异[J]. , 2011, 9(3): 181-184.
[13]	杜英春, 吕勇. 面孔加工特异性的事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(4): 268-274.
[14]	郑金香,阴国恩. 幼儿自由游戏行为性别差异的观察研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 415-418.