优差生亲子沟通与认知和情绪压力的关系

心理与行为研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2): 133-140.

优差生亲子沟通与认知和情绪压力的关系

池丽萍,辛自强

中华女子学院教育学院心理学系,北京 100101; 中央财经大学社会发展学院心理学系,北京 100081

收稿日期:2009-11-17 出版日期:2010-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
通讯作者: 辛自强,男,中央财经大学社会发展学院心理学系教授,博士生导师。Email: xinziqiang@sohu.com。
作者简介:池丽萍,女,中华女子学院教育学院心理学系副教授。
基金资助:
本研究得到全国教育科学“十一五”规划项目（EBA080303）的资助

RELATIONSHIP OF PARENT-CHILD COMMUNICATION AND COGNITIVE HOLDING POWER OR EMOTIONAL STRESS FOR HIGH-AND LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS

Chi Liping,Xin Ziqiang

Department of Psychology, China Women′s University, Beijing 100101; Department of Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081

Received:2009-11-17 Online:2010-06-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究对优生、差生与其父母围绕数学问题解决而展开的沟通过程进行观察,并采用量表法测量其感受到的认知和情绪压力,以考察两变量之间的关系及优、差生在两者得分上的差异。结果发现：（1）优生无论在沟通行为次数上,还是在沟通行为类型上都表现出一些积极特征;（2）优生的二级认知压力显著高于差生,一级认知压力和情绪压力显著低于差生;（3）督促、指责等消极沟通行为都与一级认知压力和情绪压力存在正相关,而积极沟通行为,如方法指导等则与一级认知压力、情绪压力呈显著负相关;一级认知压力与正确提议比例之间存在显著负相关。

关键词: 亲子沟通, 认知压力, 情绪压力, 优生, 差生

Abstract: The present study observed and analyzed the communication about mathematics problem-solving of twenty-six high-and low-achieving students and their parents to explore the difference of parent- child communication between high- and low-achieving students. The results showed that: 1)There were more positive communicating behaviors and there were less negative communicating behaviors in parent-child communication of high-achieving students. 2)Second order cognitive holding power of high-achieving students was stronger than low-achieving students, while the first order cognitive holding power and emotional stress were weaker than high-achieving students. 3)Some negative communicating behaviors positively correlated with children′s first order cognitive holding power and emotional stress, and there were negative correlation between first order cognitive holding power and rate of correct suggestion.

Key words: parent-child communication, cognitive holding power, emotional stress, high-achieving student, low-achieving student

中图分类号:

B844.2

池丽萍,辛自强. 优差生亲子沟通与认知和情绪压力的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(2): 133-140.

Chi Liping,Xin Ziqiang. RELATIONSHIP OF PARENT-CHILD COMMUNICATION AND COGNITIVE HOLDING POWER OR EMOTIONAL STRESS FOR HIGH-AND LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(2): 133-140.

参考文献

[1] 蔡金法. 中美学生数学学习的系列实证研究. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2007
[2] 刘颂, 刘全礼. 学业不良儿童家庭教育资源研究. 中国特殊教育, 2007, 6: 85-88
[3] Huntsinger C S, Jose P E, Larson S L, Krieg D B, Shaligram C. Mathematics, vocabulary, and reading development in Chinese American and European American children over the primary school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, 92(4): 745-760
[4] Sy S R, Rowley S J, Schulenberg J E. Predictors of parent involvement across contexts in Asian American and European American Families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2007, 38(1): 1-32
[5] Portes P R, Cuentas T E, Zady M F. Cognitive socialization across ethnocultural contexts: Literacy and cultural differences in intellectual performance and parent-child interaction. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2000, 161(1): 79-98
[6] Lee S M, Kushner J, Cho S H. Effects of parent′s gender, child′s gender, and parental involvement on the academic achievement of adolescents in single parent families. Sex Roles, 2007, 56: 149-157
[7] van Ingen D J, Moore L L, Fuemmeler J A. Parental overinvolvement: A qualitative study. Journal of Developmental Physical Disabilities, 2008, 20: 449-465
[8] Powell D R, Peet S H. Development and outcomes of a community-based intervention to improve parents′ use of inquiry in informal learning contexts. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008, 29: 259-273
[9] Stevenson J. Performance of the cognitive holding power questionnaire in schools. Learning and Instruction, 1998, 8(5): 393-410
[10] Stevenson J C, Evans G. Conceptualization and measurement of cognitive holding power. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1994, 31(2): 161-181
[11] Xin Ziqiang. Fourth through sixth graders′ representations of area-of-rectangle problems: Influences of relational complexity and cognitive holding power. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 2008, 142(6): 581-600
[12] Xin Ziqiang, Zhang Li. Cognitive holding power, fluid intelligence, and mathematical achievement as predictors of children′s realistic problem solving. Learning and Individual Difference, 2009, 19(1): 124-129
[13] Hubbs-Tait L, Culp A M, Culp R E, Miller C E. Relation of maternal cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and intrusive behavior during Head Start to children′s kindergarten cognitive abilities. Child Development, 2002, 73: 110-131
[14] Tenenbaum H R, Leaper C. Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 2003, 39: 34-47
[15] 辛自强, 张莉. 基于关系-表征复杂性模型的数学应用题表征能力测验. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 34-40
[16] Dunbar N E. Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 2004, 4(3&4): 235-248