航空安全文化评估新进展

心理与行为研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 130-136.

航空安全文化评估新进展

游旭群^1,2,姬鸣^1,2,顾祥华³,杨仕云^2,3

1天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074;
2陕西师范大学心理学系,西安 710062;
3中国南方航空公司航空卫生中心,广州 510405

收稿日期:2007-03-16 出版日期:2008-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
通讯作者: 姬鸣,男,陕西师范大学心理系硕士研究生。Email: jiming@stu.snnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:游旭群,男,陕西师范大学心理系教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学重点基地05JJDXLX165重大项目的资助。

NEW PROGRESS OF AVIATION SAFETY CULTURE ASSESSMENT

You Xuqun^1,2,Ji Ming^1,2,Gu Xianghua³,Yang Shiyun^2,3

1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
2 Department of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710062;
3 Aviation Medicine Center, China Southern Airlines Ltd., Guangzhou 510405

Received:2007-03-16 Online:2008-06-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 安全文化作为组织文化的重要组成部分,是影响组织成员安全态度和行为的核心价值体系,通过个体变量对组织安全保健和安全绩效产生深远的影响。在安全态度与价值观层面上利用问卷调查的形式探讨航空安全文化的结构成份,不仅揭示了安全文化现象背后的基本隐形内涵,同时也有助于我们理解特定文化因素在现代航空安全管理中的重要作用。该文阐述了安全文化与航空安全管理的关系问题,介绍了不同航空组织内安全文化的作用及评估机制,并进一步指出了目前研究中存在的不足和对未来研究的展望。

关键词: 航空安全文化, 安全氛围, 评估

Abstract: Safety culture is a sub-facet of organizational culture, which affects members′ safety attitudes and behavior in relation to an organizations ongoing health and safety performance. Most researchers study the dimensionality of aviation safety culture through surveying people′s safety attitudes and values, which not only can reveal the basic assumptions underlying those phenomena, but also is helpful to understand the vital role of the specific cultural factors in the aviation safety management. The present study introduced the relationship between safety culture and aviation safety management, and addressed the function of safety culture and it′s assessment in different aviation organizations. The current limitation and the future direction of the aviation safety culture research are discussed.

Key words: aviation safety culture, safety climate, assessment

中图分类号:

B849

游旭群,姬鸣,顾祥华,杨仕云. 航空安全文化评估新进展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(2): 130-136.

You Xuqun,Ji Ming,Gu Xianghua,Yang Shiyun. NEW PROGRESS OF AVIATION SAFETY CULTURE ASSESSMENT[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2008, 6(2): 130-136.

参考文献

[1] IAEI-TECDOC-860. ASCOT guide lines for organizational self-assessment of safety culture and for reviews by the assessment of safety culture in organization team, Technique Report, Vienna, 1996
[2] Civil Aviation Authority. Global fatal accident review: 1980-1996. London, 1998
[3] Cooper M D. Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 2000, 36: 111~136
[4] Glendon A I, Stanton N A. Perspectives on safety culture. Safety Science, 2000, 34: 43~72
[5] Wiegmann D A, Shappell S A. Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: Application of the human factors analysis and classification system(HFACS). Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 2001, 72(11): 1006~1016
[6] Helmreich R L, Merritt A C. Culture at work: National, organizational, and professional influences. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate, 1998
[7] Helmreich R L, Merritt A C, Sherman P J. Research project evaluates the effect of culture on flight crew behavior. International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO)Journal, 1997, 51(8): 14~16
[8] Hofstede G. Culture′s consequence: International differences in work related values. Berverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980
[9] Helmreich R L, Foushee H C, Benson R, et al. Cockpit management attitudes: Exploring the attitude-performance linkage. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 1986, 57: 1198~1200
[10] Hunter D R. Airman research questionnaires: Methodology and overall results (Rep. No.DOT/FAA/AM-95/27). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1995
[11] Hunter D R. Measurement of hazardous attitudes among pilots. The international journal of aviation psychology, 2005, 15(1): 23~43
[12] Hunter D R. Retrospective and prospective validity of aircraft accident risk indicators. Human Factors, 2001, 43: 509~518
[13] Hale A R, Heming B H J, Smit K, et al. Evaluating safety in the management of maintenance activities in the chemical process industry. Safety Science, 1998, 28(1): 21~44
[14] McDonald N, Corrigan S, Daly C, et al. Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science, 2000, 34: 151~176
[15] Mason S. Improving maintenance by reducing human error. 15th annual human factors in aviation maintenance symposium, London, 2001
[16] Taylor J C, Christensen T D. Airlines maintenance resource management: Improving communication. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1998
[17] Taylor J C, Patankar M S. Four generations of maintenance resource management programs in the United States: An analysis of the past, present and future. The Journal of Air Transportation World Wide, 2001, 6(2): 3~32
[18] Taylor J C, Thomas R. Toward measuring safety culture in aviation maintenance: The structure of trust and professionalism. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2003, 13(4): 321~343
[19] Hudson P. Aviation safety culture. Journal of Aviation Management, 2003, 4: 24~48
[20] Vecchio-Sadus A M, Griffiths S. Marketing strategies for enhancing safety culture. Safety Science, 2004, 42(7): 601~619
[21] Remington R W, Johnston J C, Ruthruff E, et al. Visual search in complex displays: effects of traffic load, regularity, and conflict geometry on thedetection of conflicts by air traffic controllers. Draft Technical Report, NASA Ames Research Center, 2001
[22] Kristensen T S, Hannerz H, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005, 31(6): 438~449
[23] Ekvall G. User′s guide, Questionnaire A: Working climate (GEFA). In: Arvidsson M, Johansson C R, Ek Å, & Akselsson R. Organisational climate and psychosocial work environment in air traffic control. The 6th European Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, Oporto, Portugal, November 24~26, 2004
[24] Mearns K, Flin R, Flemming M. Measuring safety climate on offshore installations. Work & Stress, 1998, 12: 238~254
[25] Cohen D. Culture variations: considerations and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, 127(4): 451~471
[26] Diaz R I, Cabrera D D. Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1997, 29(5): 643~650
[27] Cox S J, Cheyne A J. Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. Safety Science, 2000, 34: 111~129
[28] Bachiochi P, Weiner S P. Qualitative data collective and analysis. In: Rogelberg S G ed. Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2002