[1] Vinod G, Jordan G. Are the frontal lobes implicated in "planning" functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi. Neuropsychologia, 1995, 33(5): 623~642 [2] Simon P D. Memory and planning processes in solutions to well-structured problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2000, 53(3): 896~927 [3] Marilyn C W, Trey S, Michelle S. Tower of Hanoi and London: Contribution of working memory and inhibition to performance. Brain and Cognition, 1999, 41: 231~242 [4] Marilyn W, Antoinette C, Kathieen C, et al. Error and temporal patterns in tower of Hanoi performance: Cognitive mechanisms and individual differences. The Journal of General Psychology, 1995, 122(1): 69~81 [5] Katrina Keil, Alfred W K. Examining executive function in individuals with brain injury: A review. Aphasiology, 2002, 16(3): 305~335 [6] Lehto J. Are executive function tests dependent on working memory capacity? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1996, 49A(1): 29~50 [7] Simon J H, Capon A, Copp C,et al. Conditional reasoning and the Tower of Hanoi: The role of spatial and verbal working memory. British Journal of Psychology, 2002, 93: 501~518 [8] Numminen H, Lehto J E, Ruoppila I. Tower of Hanoi and working memory in adult persons with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2001, 22: 373~387 [9] 刘昌. 数学学习困难儿童的认知加工机制研究. 南京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 3: 81~88 [10] Baddeley A. Random generation and the executive control of working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1998, 51A(4): 819~852 [11] Jan M N, Kate J G. Solving the Tower of Hanoi: does mode of presentation matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 2001, 19: 579~592