陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. (2018). 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点: 眼动证据. 心理发展与教育, 34(6), 692–699 陈琳, 钟罗金, 冷英, 莫雷. (2014). 拼音自动加工和语义加工中汉字字形的激活. 心理学报, 46(11), 1661–1670 陈影, 雷江华, 杨福义. (2020). 编码方式对不同拼音能力聋生汉字音位识别的影响. 中国特殊教育, (4), 19–24, 32, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2020.04.004 侯友. (2012). 蒙、汉双语词汇识别的ERP研究(博士学位论文). 天津师范大学. 兰泽波, 梁晓伟, 王正光, 姜琨, 孟珠, 闫国利. (2020). 听障大学生句子阅读中语音加工的眼动研究. 心理科学, 43(4), 997–1003 雷江华, 孙灯勇, 刘昌, 方俊明. (2010). 语音编码在聋生唇读汉字语音识别中的作用. 心理科学, 33(2), 315–317, 293 李培, 刘俊飞, 刘涛, 张珊珊, 杨亦鸣. (2017). 聋人汉语词汇阅读中的语音加工研究. 语言文字应用, (2), 57–66 吕勇, 沈德立, 杜英春, 韩宗义. (2004). 听觉呈现条件下汉语双字词语义和语音启动的ERP研究. 心理科学, 27(1), 8–12, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.01.003 申敏, 郑文芳, 卢晓月, 于丽玫. (2013). 3岁听障与健听儿童开放式单音节测试结果比较分析. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 21(5), 460–464, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2013.05.006 宋凤宁, 林泳海, 宋歌, 张必隐. (2000). 连绵词语音类似的启动效应. 心理科学, 23(3), 306–310, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2000.03.012 王志强, 王雁. (2016a). 不同语音表征能力的听力残疾大学生语音编码研究. 中国特殊教育, (4), 27–34 王志强, 王雁. (2016b). 语音与字形在高频汉字识别中的作用——基于听障大学生与健听大学生的比较研究. 中国特殊教育, (11), 26–31, 43 王志强, 王雁, 刘海涵. (2016). 听力残疾大学生语音意识研究. 中国特殊教育, (2), 30–36, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2016.02.006 辛昕, 兰天一, 张清芳. (2020). 英汉双语者二语口语产生中音韵编码过程的同化机制. 心理学报, 52(12), 1377–1392 邢福义, 吴振国. (2010). 语言学概论 (第2版). 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社. 闫国利, 兰泽波, 孟珠, 王影超, 王正光. (2019). 听障者语音编码的研究范式述评. 心理科学, 42(2), 500–505 杨群, 王艳, 张积家. (2019). 正字法深度对汉族、维吾尔族大学生汉字词命名的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 1–13 印丛, 王娟, 张积家. (2011). 汉语言语产生中语音、字形启动的位置效应. 心理学报, 43(9), 1002–1012 昝飞, 谭和平. (2004). 移动窗口条件下聋生阅读过程中字词识别的实验研究. 心理科学, 27(6), 1376–1380, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.06.025 昝飞, 谭和平. (2005). 聋生汉字识别的同音判断与启动效应实验研究. 心理科学, 28(5), 1089–1095, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2005.05.016 张帆, 李德高. (2017). 聋生“是……的”句的句法意识. 心理学报, 49(11), 1383–1391 张清芳, 王雪娇. (2020). 汉语口语词汇产生的音韵编码单元: 内隐启动范式的ERP研究. 心理学报, 52(4), 414–425 张清芳, 杨玉芳. (2004). 汉语词汇产生中语义、字形和音韵激活的时间进程. 心理学报, 36(1), 1–8 周晓林, 曲延轩, 庄捷. (2003). 再探汉字加工中语音、语义激活的相对时间进程. 心理与行为研究, 1(4), 241–247 朱璐瑶, 崔占玲. (2017). 字形信息在藏-汉双语者汉字词识别中的作用. 心理学探新, 37(4), 320–326 Bélanger, N. N., Baum, S. R., & Mayberry, R. I. (2012). Reading difficulties in adult deaf readers of French: Phonological codes, not guilty! Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 263–285. Bélanger, N. N., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner, K. (2013). Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2237–2252, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.780085. Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2015). What eye movements reveal about deaf readers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 220–226, doi: 10.1177/0963721414567527. Blythe, H. I., Dickins, J. H., Kennedy, C. R., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Phonological processing during silent reading in teenagers who are deaf/hard of hearing: An eye movement investigation. Developmental Science, 21(5), e12643, doi: 10.1111/desc.12643. Costello, B., Caffarra, S., Fariña, N., Duabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2021). Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish. Scientific Reports, 11, 5202, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84490-5. Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2017). Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers. Cognition, 168, 27–33, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.015. Friesen, D. C., & Joanisse, M. F. (2012). Homophone effects in deaf readers: Evidence from lexical decision. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 375–388, doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9275-6. Fu, S. M., Chen, Y. P., Smith, S., Iversen, S., & Matthews, P. M. (2002). Effects of word form on brain processing of written Chinese. NeuroImage, 17(3), 1538–1548, doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1155. Furlonger, B., Holmes, V. M., & Rickards, F. W. (2014). Phonological awareness and reading proficiency in adults with profound deafness. Reading Psychology, 35(4), 357–396, doi: 10.1080/02702711.2012.726944. Glezer, L. S., Weisberg, J., O’Grady Farnady, C., McCullough, S., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Emmorey, K. (2018). Orthographic and phonological selectivity across the reading system in deaf skilled readers. Neuropsychologia, 117, 500–512, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.010. Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2017). Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 106, 261–279, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.006. Hanson, V. L., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1990). Short-term memory coding by deaf signers: The primary language coding hypothesis reconsidered. Cognitive Psychology, 22(2), 211–224, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90016-W. Izzo, A. (2002). Phonemic awareness and reading ability: An investigation with young readers who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(4), 18–28, doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0242. Jared, D., & O’Donnell, K. (2017). Skilled adult readers activate the meanings of high-frequency words using phonology: Evidence from eye tracking. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 334–346. Leaner, S. A., Sandridge, S. A., & Kricos, P. B. (1987). Training influences on visual consonant and sentence recognition. Ear and Hearing, 8(5), 283–287, doi: 10.1097/00003446-198710000-00005. Leck, K. J., Weekes, B. S., & Chen, M. J. (1995). Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers. Memory & Cognition, 23(4), 468–476. Lee, H. W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming technique. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 624–634. Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A. A., & Lieberman, A. M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 164–188, doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq049. Meade, G., Midgley, K. J., Sehyr, Z. S., Holcomb, P. J., & Emmorey, K. (2017). Implicit co-activation of American sign language in deaf readers: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 170, 50–61, doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.03.004. Peleg, O., Ben-Hur, G., & Segal, O. (2020). Orthographic, phonological, and semantic dynamics during visual word recognition in deaf versus hearing adults. Journal of Speech, (7), 2334–2344. Perea, M., Marcet, A., & Vergara-Martínez, M. (2016). Phonological-lexical feedback during early abstract encoding: The case of deaf readers. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0146265, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146265. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2012). The dynamics of reading in non-Roman writing systems: A reading and writing special issue. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 935–950, doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9369-4. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Simmons, K., & Laughon, P. (1990). Identifying phonological coding problems in disabled readers: Naming, counting, or span measures. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(4), 236–243, doi: 10.2307/1510350. Transler, C., & Reitsma, P. (2005). Phonological coding in reading of deaf children: Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(4), 525–542, doi: 10.1348/026151005X26796. Yan, G. L., Lan, Z. B., Meng, Z., Wang, Y. C., & Benson, V. (2021). Phonological coding during sentence reading in Chinese deaf readers: An eye-tracking study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(4), 287–303, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2020.1778000. Yan, M., Pan, J. E., Bélanger, N. N., & Shu, H. (2015). Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (1), 254–261. Ye, Y., & Connine, C. M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 609–630, doi: 10.1080/016909699386202. Zhou, W., Shu, H., Miller, K., & Yan, M. (2018). Reliance on orthography and phonology in reading of Chinese: A developmental study. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 370–391, doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12111.
|