Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2023, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 736-743.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.003
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Feifei LIANG1,2,3,*(), Linlin FENG2, Ying LIU2, Changhao WANG2, Jie WANG2
Received:
2023-04-19
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-11-20
Contact:
Feifei LIANG
梁菲菲1,2,3,*(), 冯琳琳2, 刘瑛2, 王昶浩2, 王洁2
通讯作者:
梁菲菲
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Feifei LIANG, Linlin FENG, Ying LIU, Changhao WANG, Jie WANG. The Role of Character Positional Probability in Chinese Two-Word Identification: Moderation of Lexical Contextual Diversity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 736-743.
梁菲菲, 冯琳琳, 刘瑛, 王昶浩, 王洁. 词素位置概率信息在中文双字词识别中的作用:词汇语境多样性的调节[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 736-743.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.003
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
目标词举例 | 银器 | 几何 | 岛屿 | 派对 |
首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.10) | 0.88(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.24(0.04) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.85(0.09) | 0.24(0.05) |
整词语境多样性(log转换) | 1.70(0.13) | 1.70(0.25) | 1.77(0.41) | 1.73(0.60) |
整词词频(log转换) | 1.83(0.07) | 1.77(0.26) | 1.90(0.43) | 1.83(0.67) |
首词素笔画数 | 9.10(2.99) | 9.43(3.37) | 8.98(2.93) | 7.98(3.29) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.38(3.34) | 8.55(3.25) | 8.78(3.46) | 8.50(3.04) |
首词素字频 | 82.83(187.40) | 650.33(3251.94) | 250.00(754.99) | 282.70(921.99) |
尾词素字频 | 201.61(809.57) | 101.04(240.02) | 246.49(1030.61) | 347.27(755.17) |
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
目标词举例 | 银器 | 几何 | 岛屿 | 派对 |
首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.10) | 0.88(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.24(0.04) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.85(0.09) | 0.24(0.05) |
整词语境多样性(log转换) | 1.70(0.13) | 1.70(0.25) | 1.77(0.41) | 1.73(0.60) |
整词词频(log转换) | 1.83(0.07) | 1.77(0.26) | 1.90(0.43) | 1.83(0.67) |
首词素笔画数 | 9.10(2.99) | 9.43(3.37) | 8.98(2.93) | 7.98(3.29) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.38(3.34) | 8.55(3.25) | 8.78(3.46) | 8.50(3.04) |
首词素字频 | 82.83(187.40) | 650.33(3251.94) | 250.00(754.99) | 282.70(921.99) |
尾词素字频 | 201.61(809.57) | 101.04(240.02) | 246.49(1030.61) | 347.27(755.17) |
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.90(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.20(0.08) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.07) | 0.82(0.09) | 0.19(0.09) |
首词素笔画数 | 9.53(2.83) | 9.55(4.05) | 9.38(2.73) | 8.43(3.11) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.50(2.81) | 9.45(3.15) | 9.15(3.49) | 8.93(2.74) |
首词素字频 | 55.28(105.24) | 640.13(3253.68) | 205.13(707.12) | 59.24(92.99) |
尾词素字频 | 187.60(810.07) | 85.23(219.19) | 274.91(977.70) | 133.62(327.05) |
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.90(0.09) | 0.20(0.06) | 0.20(0.08) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.07) | 0.82(0.09) | 0.19(0.09) |
首词素笔画数 | 9.53(2.83) | 9.55(4.05) | 9.38(2.73) | 8.43(3.11) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.50(2.81) | 9.45(3.15) | 9.15(3.49) | 8.93(2.74) |
首词素字频 | 55.28(105.24) | 640.13(3253.68) | 205.13(707.12) | 59.24(92.99) |
尾词素字频 | 187.60(810.07) | 85.23(219.19) | 274.91(977.70) | 133.62(327.05) |
条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
HH | 0.94(0.25) | 659(252) |
HL | 0.96(0.20) | 644(239) |
LH | 0.95(0.22) | 625(211) |
LL | 0.89(0.31) | 651(250) |
条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
HH | 0.94(0.25) | 659(252) |
HL | 0.96(0.20) | 644(239) |
LH | 0.95(0.22) | 625(211) |
LL | 0.89(0.31) | 651(250) |
变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
正确率 | 截距 | 3.73 | 0.17 | 21.69*** | [3.39, 4.06] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.27 | 0.26 | −1.04 | [−0.78, 0.24] | |
尾词素位置概率 | −0.29 | 0.28 | −1.05 | [−0.83, 0.25] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | −1.37 | 0.52 | −2.63** | [−2.39, −0.35] | |
比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 1.02 | [−0.01, 0.03] | |
比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −2.42* | [−0.05, −0.01] | |
反应时 | 截距 | 6.43 | 0.02 | 344.60*** | [6.39, 6.47] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.73 | [−0.04, 0.02] | |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.52 | [−0.02, 0.04] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.12] | |
比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.03 | [−0.03, 0.01] | |
比较2 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.79 | [−0.002, 0.04] |
变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
正确率 | 截距 | 3.73 | 0.17 | 21.69*** | [3.39, 4.06] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.27 | 0.26 | −1.04 | [−0.78, 0.24] | |
尾词素位置概率 | −0.29 | 0.28 | −1.05 | [−0.83, 0.25] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | −1.37 | 0.52 | −2.63** | [−2.39, −0.35] | |
比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 1.02 | [−0.01, 0.03] | |
比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −2.42* | [−0.05, −0.01] | |
反应时 | 截距 | 6.43 | 0.02 | 344.60*** | [6.39, 6.47] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.73 | [−0.04, 0.02] | |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.52 | [−0.02, 0.04] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.12] | |
比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.03 | [−0.03, 0.01] | |
比较2 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.79 | [−0.002, 0.04] |
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
目标词举例 | 讲坛 | 皇朝 | 量筒 | 味精 |
首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.11) | 0.88(0.10) | 0.22(0.05) | 0.22(0.06) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.85(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.87(0.10) | 0.22(0.06) |
整词语境多样性(log转换) | 0.53(0.09) | 0.48(0.18) | 0.49(0.22) | 0.46(0.30) |
整词词频(log转换) | 0.56(0.09) | 0.51(0.14) | 0.56(0.24) | 0.51(0.33) |
首词素笔画数 | 9.49(2.47) | 9.83(2.36) | 9.17(3.01) | 8.31(2.97) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.49(3.36) | 9.09(3.39) | 9.51(3.63) | 9.74(3.67) |
首词素字频 | 50.31(152.70) | 26.47(47.78) | 44.74(71.33) | 91.94(205.76) |
尾词素字频 | 214.31(1065.38) | 50.03(83.49) | 39.88(91.67) | 161.99(669.65) |
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
目标词举例 | 讲坛 | 皇朝 | 量筒 | 味精 |
首词素位置概率 | 0.86(0.11) | 0.88(0.10) | 0.22(0.05) | 0.22(0.06) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.85(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.87(0.10) | 0.22(0.06) |
整词语境多样性(log转换) | 0.53(0.09) | 0.48(0.18) | 0.49(0.22) | 0.46(0.30) |
整词词频(log转换) | 0.56(0.09) | 0.51(0.14) | 0.56(0.24) | 0.51(0.33) |
首词素笔画数 | 9.49(2.47) | 9.83(2.36) | 9.17(3.01) | 8.31(2.97) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.49(3.36) | 9.09(3.39) | 9.51(3.63) | 9.74(3.67) |
首词素字频 | 50.31(152.70) | 26.47(47.78) | 44.74(71.33) | 91.94(205.76) |
尾词素字频 | 214.31(1065.38) | 50.03(83.49) | 39.88(91.67) | 161.99(669.65) |
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.11) | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.08) | 0.19(0.08) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.84(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.83(0.09) | 0.14(0.12) |
首词素笔画数 | 10.71(3.42) | 10.34(2.89) | 9.11(3.12) | 9.51(3.85) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.73(2.92) | 9.32(3.15) | 9.04(3.58) | 9.24(2.69) |
首词素字频 | 16.13(17.81) | 25.90(47.64) | 34.96(63.65) | 53.92(199.01) |
尾词素字频 | 69.91(113.90) | 74.79(113.16) | 79.12(169.91) | 31.29(37.96) |
条件 | HH | HL | LH | LL |
首词素位置概率 | 0.87(0.11) | 0.86(0.10) | 0.20(0.08) | 0.19(0.08) |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.84(0.10) | 0.22(0.07) | 0.83(0.09) | 0.14(0.12) |
首词素笔画数 | 10.71(3.42) | 10.34(2.89) | 9.11(3.12) | 9.51(3.85) |
尾词素笔画数 | 9.73(2.92) | 9.32(3.15) | 9.04(3.58) | 9.24(2.69) |
首词素字频 | 16.13(17.81) | 25.90(47.64) | 34.96(63.65) | 53.92(199.01) |
尾词素字频 | 69.91(113.90) | 74.79(113.16) | 79.12(169.91) | 31.29(37.96) |
条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
HH | 0.89(0.32) | 759(303) |
HL | 0.85(0.36) | 776(321) |
LH | 0.87(0.33) | 725(279) |
LL | 0.73(0.44) | 760(303) |
条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
HH | 0.89(0.32) | 759(303) |
HL | 0.85(0.36) | 776(321) |
LH | 0.87(0.33) | 725(279) |
LL | 0.73(0.44) | 760(303) |
变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
正确率 | 截距 | 2.31 | 0.15 | 15.11*** | [2.01, 2.61] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.48 | 0.25 | −1.94 | [−0.97, 0.01] | |
尾词素位置概率 | −0.81 | 0.25 | −3.22** | [−1.31, −0.32] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.75 | 0.50 | −1.52 | [−1.72, 0.22] | |
反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 317.58*** | [6.54, 6.63] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.94 | [−0.06, 0.02] | |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.08] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.09 | [−0.04, 0.13] |
变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
正确率 | 截距 | 2.31 | 0.15 | 15.11*** | [2.01, 2.61] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.48 | 0.25 | −1.94 | [−0.97, 0.01] | |
尾词素位置概率 | −0.81 | 0.25 | −3.22** | [−1.31, −0.32] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.75 | 0.50 | −1.52 | [−1.72, 0.22] | |
反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 317.58*** | [6.54, 6.63] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.94 | [−0.06, 0.02] | |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.99* | [0.001, 0.08] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.09 | [−0.04, 0.13] |
条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
HH | 0.90(0.30) | 773(295) |
HL | 0.91(0.29) | 763(293) |
LH | 0.91(0.29) | 767(299) |
LL | 0.96(0.20) | 718(275) |
条件 | 正确率 | 反应时(ms) |
HH | 0.90(0.30) | 773(295) |
HL | 0.91(0.29) | 763(293) |
LH | 0.91(0.29) | 767(299) |
LL | 0.96(0.20) | 718(275) |
变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
正确率 | 截距 | 3.09 | 0.15 | 21.12*** | [2.80, 3.38] |
首词素位置概率 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 3.54*** | [0.23, 0.80] | |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.54 | 0.14 | 3.96*** | [0.27, 0.81] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.90 | 0.27 | 3.29*** | [0.36, 1.43] | |
比较1 | −0.002 | 0.01 | −0.04 | [−0.01, 0.01] | |
比较2 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.88*** | [0.01, 0.04] | |
反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 312.37*** | [6.54, 6.62] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −3.85*** | [−0.05, −0.02] | |
尾词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −4.22*** | [−0.06, −0.02] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −2.96** | [−0.09, −0.02] | |
比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.78 | [−0.02, 0.01] | |
比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −5.30*** | [−0.05, −0.02] |
变量 | b | SE | t/z | 95%CI | |
正确率 | 截距 | 3.09 | 0.15 | 21.12*** | [2.80, 3.38] |
首词素位置概率 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 3.54*** | [0.23, 0.80] | |
尾词素位置概率 | 0.54 | 0.14 | 3.96*** | [0.27, 0.81] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | 0.90 | 0.27 | 3.29*** | [0.36, 1.43] | |
比较1 | −0.002 | 0.01 | −0.04 | [−0.01, 0.01] | |
比较2 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.88*** | [0.01, 0.04] | |
反应时 | 截距 | 6.58 | 0.02 | 312.37*** | [6.54, 6.62] |
首词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −3.85*** | [−0.05, −0.02] | |
尾词素位置概率 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −4.22*** | [−0.06, −0.02] | |
首×尾词素位置概率 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −2.96** | [−0.09, −0.02] | |
比较1 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.78 | [−0.02, 0.01] | |
比较2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −5.30*** | [−0.05, −0.02] |
白学军, 马杰, 李馨, 连坤予, 谭珂, 杨宇, 梁菲菲. 发展性阅读障碍儿童的新词习得及其改善. 心理学报, 2019, 51 (4): 471- 483. | |
曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 于海涛, 李鹏, 王敬欣. 词素位置概率在中文阅读中的作用: 词汇判断和眼动研究. 心理学报, 2023, 55 (2): 159- 176. | |
贺斐. (2021). 汉语新词词形信息在阅读伴随新词学习中的作用——基于眼动的证据(博士学位论文). 天津师范大学. | |
梁菲菲, 马杰, 李馨, 连坤予, 谭珂, 白学军. (2019). 发展性阅读障碍儿童阅读中的眼跳定位缺陷: 基于新词学习的实验证据. 心理学报, 51(7), 805–815. | |
梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分: 基于副中央凹加工的证据. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20 (3): 318- 324.
DOI |
|
Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F.. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 2006, 17 (9): 814- 823.
DOI |
|
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2023). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. Retrieved April 19, 2023, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html | |
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 2010, 5 (6): e10729.
DOI |
|
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C.. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 1988, 28 (3): 297- 332.
DOI |
|
Chen, Q. R., Huang, X., Bai, L., Xu, X. D., Yang, Y. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K.. The effect of contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, 24 (2): 510- 518. | |
Clifton, C., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., Liversedge, S. P., Reichle, E. D., & Schotter, E. R.. Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 2016, 86, 1- 19.
DOI |
|
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J.. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 2001, 108 (1): 204- 256.
DOI |
|
Davis, C. J.. The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 2001, 62 (1–B): 594. | |
Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T.. Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 2013, 45 (3): 718- 730.
DOI |
|
Huang, X., Lin, D., Yang, Y. M., Xu, Y. H., Chen, Q. R., & Tanenhaus, M. K.. Effects of character and word contextual diversity in Chinese beginning readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2021, 25 (3): 251- 271.
DOI |
|
Johns, B. T., Gruenenfelder, T. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Jones, M. N.. Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012, 132 (2): EL74- EL80.
DOI |
|
Jones, M. N., Dye, M., & Johns, B. T.. Context as an organizing principle of the lexicon. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2017, 67, 239- 283. | |
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A.. An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 2020, 127 (6): 1139- 1162.
DOI |
|
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Li, X., Zang, C. L., & Liversedge, S. P.. The role of character positional frequency on Chinese word learning during natural reading. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (11): e0187656.
DOI |
|
Liang, F. F., Blythe, H. I., Zang, C. L., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P.. Positional character frequency and word spacing facilitate the acquisition of novel words during Chinese children’s reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2015, 27 (5): 594- 608.
DOI |
|
Liang, F. F., Gao, Q., Li, X., Wang, Y. S., Bai, X. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2023). The importance of the positional probability of word final (but not word initial) characters for word segmentation and identification in children and adults’ natural Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(1), 98–115. | |
Ma, G. J., & Li, X. S.. How character complexity modulates eye movement control in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 2015, 28 (6): 747- 761.
DOI |
|
Nation, K.. Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. NPJ Science of Learning, 2017, 2 (1): 3.
DOI |
|
Pagán, A., Bird, M., Hsiao, Y., & Nation, K.. Both semantic diversity and frequency influence children’s sentence reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2020, 24 (4): 356- 364.
DOI |
|
Perea, M., & Acha, J.. Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 2009, 49 (15): 1994- 2000.
DOI |
|
Perea, M., Soares, A. P., & Comesaña, M.. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2013, 116 (1): 37- 44.
DOI |
|
Plummer, P., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2014). The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 275–283. | |
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. | |
Rosa, E., Tapia, J. L., & Perea, M.. Contextual diversity facilitates learning new words in the classroom. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (6): e0179004.
DOI |
|
Soares, A. P., Machado, J., Costa, A., Iriarte, Á., Simões, A., de Almeida, J. J., … Perea, M.. On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2015, 68 (4): 680- 696.
DOI |
|
Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761–775. | |
Tsang, Y. K., & Zou, Y.. An ERP megastudy of Chinese word recognition. Psychophysiology, 2022, 59 (11): e14111.
DOI |
|
Whitney, C.. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001, 8 (2): 221- 243. |
[1] | Ruqi CHEN, Yaqian BAO, Linjieqiong HUANG, Xingshan LI. An Introduction to the Chinese Reading Model (CRM) [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 725-735. |
[2] | Zijia LU, Zhichao ZHANG, Ying FU, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG, Xuejun BAI. Repeating Words Cannot Help Chinese Readers to Obtain Word Class Information from Parafoveal Words [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 577-584. |
[3] | Lijuan ZHANG, Fengjun ZHANG, Sainan ZHAO, Jingxin WANG. The Predominant Role of Preview Plausibility on Semantic Preview Benefit of Two-Character Words in Chinese Reading: An Eye Movement Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 12-19. |
[4] | Haibo CAO, Liang REN, Dan HAN, Dongli JIA, Jingxin WANG. The Role of Character Positional Frequency of Word Segmentation of Overlapping Ambiguous Strings in Chinese [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 732-738. |
[5] | ZHANG Manman, HU Huilan, BIAN Han, LI Fang, ZHANG Zhichao, ZANG Chuanli. Word Frequency Effects in Fast and Slow Readers During Skilled Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 304-310. |
[6] | WANG Yongsheng, HE Liyuan, LI Xin, BAI Xuejun. The Role of the First Character Frequency in Low-Frequency Two-Character Words in Parafoveal Processing in Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 311-317. |
[7] | LIANG Feifei, XIANG Ying, LONG Mengling. Initial Character Positional Probability Does Not Influence Word Segmentation in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Parafoveal Processing [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 318-324. |
[8] | HE Liyuan, ZHAO Xing, BAI Yu, LIU Nina. Multi-Word Unit Processing for Chinese Older Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 160-166. |
[9] | GU Junjuan, GAO Zhihua, MA Shaoyang. The Sub-Word Boundary Effect of Chinese Character Position Processing in Incremental Words [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 1-7. |
[10] | LIANG Feifei, XIANG Ying, WU Hao, HAN Yang. The Development of Word Boundary Marking in Chinese Children with Developmental Dyslexia [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 757-763. |
[11] | LIU Zhifang, ZENG Taishen, CHAI Lin, CHEN Chaoyang, TONG Wen. The Characteristics of Word Processing When Deaf Readers Read Chinese: Evidences from Disappearing Text [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 592-598. |
[12] | HE Fei, LIANG Feifei, BAI Xuejun. Semantic Radical Category Consistency Effect in Chinese Incidental Vocabulary Learning [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 304-311. |
[13] | ZHANG Manman, ZHANG Zhichao, ZANG Chuanli. Is Skipping Based on Full or Partial Processing of the Parafoveal Word in Chinese Reading? [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 311-317. |
[14] | TONG Wen, REN Mengxue, LIU Zhifang, FENG Xiao. The Effect of Word Length on Saccade Target Selection in Chinese Reading: Eye Movement Evidence [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(2): 168-175. |
[15] | GU Junjuan, GAO Zhihua, QU Qingqing. The Word Boundary Effect of Chinese Character Position Processing [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(2): 193-199. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||