Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 838-842.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Chinese Version of Civic Moral Disengament Scale

Wang Xingchao1, Yang Jiping1, 2, Gao Ling2   

  1. 1 Business College of Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031;
    2 School of Educational Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006
  • Received:2012-01-17 Online:2015-02-15 Published:2013-11-20

公民道德推脱问卷的中文版修订

王兴超1, 杨继平1, 2, 高玲2   

  1. 1 山西大学商务学院,太原 030031;
    2 山西大学教育科学学院,太原 030006
  • 通讯作者: 杨继平,男,山西大学教育科学学院教授,山西大学商务学院副院长。E-mail:jpyang@sxu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:王兴超,男,山西大学商务学院助教。
  • 基金资助:
    本研究得到教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJAXLX021)和山西大学商务学院科研项目(2012058)的资助。

Abstract: The present study was designed to revise the Civic Moral Disengagement Scale (CMDS) developed by Caprara in three samples. CMDS was administered to 631 college students, and 819 full-time employees. The results show that eight-factor model was suitable to the CMDS in China. Moral disengagement had a negatively relation with moral identity, and had a positively relation with aggressive behavior. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the measures were above 0.90, showing good measurement reliabilities. The criterion validity of the CMDS was acceptable.

Key words: civic moral disengagement, moral identity, aggressive behavior

摘要: 以大学生、员工共计1450名一般公民为被试,对Caprara等人编制的公民道德推脱问卷进行了修订。结果发现:与道德推脱理论一致,公民道德推脱问卷的八因素模型与实际数据拟合更好;同时,问卷具有良好的效标关联效度;在两个样本中,问卷的α系数均在0.90以上、分半信度系数均在0.80以上。总体而言,公民道德推脱问卷的信效度良好,可以作为测量道德推脱的工具在国内使用。

关键词: 公民道德推脱, 攻击行为, 道德认同

CLC Number: