ERPs Study on the Effect of Fast Reading Training on Attention Based on Visual Beam Search

Abstract

Abstract: Taking visual search task as detection task, and combining with event-related potentials (ERPs) technology, the present study was to investigate the effect of speed reading training on the attention function of the nervous system. During the visual fixed point search test, compared with those before training, the subjects' amplitudes of P130 and P200 at the electrode points P7 and F3 decreased significantly after training, but the amplitudes of N200 at the electrode point P7 increased significantly compared with those before training. During the visual sequence search test, it was found that the subjects' latency of P130 at the pole P7 was significantly longer than that of before training, and the amplitude of N120 at the pole P7 was significantly larger than before training. The results from the same visual search task indicated that the response time after training was less than that of before training; the response rate after training was higher than that of before training. There was a significant difference in the response rate of sequential search test between before and after training. The results suggest that the subjects' prefrontal function and exogenous attentional function may be more activated and enlarged after speed reading training.

Key words: speed reading training, visual search, attention, ERPs

摘要： 以视觉搜索任务为检测作业，运用事件相关电位（ERPs）技术，考察快速阅读训练对神经系统注意功能的影响。进行视觉定位搜索测试，被试后测ERP成分P200在电极点F3的波幅较前测显著减小，但P130在电极点P7的潜伏期显著长于前测，N200在电极点P7的波幅较前测显著增大；进行视觉顺序搜索测试，被试后测ERP成分P130在电极点P7的潜伏期显著长于前测，N120在电极点P7的波幅显著大于前测；对于相同的视觉搜索任务，被试后测的反应时和作答率均优于前测，且被试进行顺序搜索时的作答率前后测差异具有显著性。结果表明，经过快速阅读训练，被试的前额叶功能和外源性注意功能可能得到了激活和扩大。

关键词: 快速阅读训练, 视觉搜索, 注意力, ERPs

CLC Number:

B842

LI Hengping, HE Shengxi, LIU Zhengkui. ERPs Study on the Effect of Fast Reading Training on Attention Based on Visual Beam Search[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(1): 78-84.

李恒平, 何胜昔, 刘正奎. 快速阅读训练对基于视觉定向搜索的注意力影响：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 78-84.

References

奥·库兹涅佐夫, 列·赫罗莫夫. (1985). 快速阅读法(杨春华, 王靖元译). 北京: 中国青年出版社.
程玮. (2016). 快速阅读训练系统的设计与开发(硕士学位论文). 上海师范大学.
胡雅茹. (2014). 神奇的眼脑直映快读法. 北京: 新世界出版社.
克里斯蒂安·格吕宁. (2015). 快速阅读(郝湉译, 第2版). 北京: 中信出版社.
林大正, 滕春芳. (2005). 事件相关电位(ERP). 承德医学院学报, 22(3), 257-258, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6879.2005.03.042
刘婧. (2019). 国内近10年眼动研究探析. 南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 21(2), 70-82
吕勇, 闫国利, 陈连燕, 范晓红. (2000). 小学生快速阅读训练的实验研究. 心理学探新, 20(2), 25-29, 54, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2000.02.006
彭聃龄. (2019). 普通心理学(第5版). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
王慧媛. (2009). 语义关联对注意捕获的影响(硕士学位论文), 东北师范大学, 长春.
王嘉星. (2017). 略谈快速阅读的方法与策略. 人力资源管理, (6), 443-444, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8209.2017.06.362
吴琼, 石林, 夏志鹏, 卢理达, 杜欣聪. (2013). 不同时长和内容的正念训练对抑郁的干预效果. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(4), 685-689, 684
吴燕, 隋光远, 曹晓华. (2007). 内源性注意和外源性注意的ERP研究. 心理科学进展, 15(1), 71-77
闫国利, 何立媛, 宋子明. (2016). 中文阅读的基本信息加工单元初探. 心理与行为研究, 14(1), 120-126, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2016.01.018
闫国利, 吕勇. (2002). 快速阅读的理论与实践. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社.
杨林栋, 刘厚, 于瑞峰. (2014). 视野培训对视觉搜索绩效的影响. 工业工程, 17(3), 108-113, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7375.2014.03.020
袁威. (2004). 英语快速阅读的方法和技巧. 长春大学学报, 14(5), 104-106
赵亚军, 张智君. (2009). 眼睛注视线索提示效应: 内源性注意还是外源性注意? 心理学报, 41(12), 1133-1142.
Dagenbach, D., & Carr, T. H. (1994). Inhibitory processes in perceptual recognition: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222, doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205.
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Zuvic, S. M., & Visser, T. A. W. (2001). The preattentive emperor has no clothes: A dynamic redressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 479-492, doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.479.
Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2001). Visual attention: The active vision perspective. In M. Jenkin & L. Harris (Eds.), Vision and attention (pp. 83-103). New York: Springer.
Gallwey, T. J. (2009). Lobe size curves for several targets and their effect on visual search time. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(4), 601-607, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.03.001.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs.: Prentice-Hall.
Lagor, A. F., Williams, D. J., Lerner, J. B., & McClure, K. S. (2013). Lessons learned from a mindfulness-based intervention with chronically ill youth. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 1(2), 146-158, doi: 10.1037/cpp0000015.
Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 247-265, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3-25, doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66.
Semple, R. J., Reid, E. F. G., & Miller, L. (2005). Treating anxiety with mindfulness: An open trial of mindfulness training for anxious children. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19(4), 379-392, doi: 10.1891/jcop.2005.19.4.379.
Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Karazsia, B. T., Felver, J. C., Myers, R. E., & Nugent, K. (2016). Effects of Samatha meditation on active academic engagement and math performance of students with attention deficit/Hyperactivity disorder. Mindfulness, 7(1), 68-75, doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0424-5.
Tang, Y. Y., Ma, Y. H., Wang, J. H., Fan, Y. X., Feng, S. G., Lu, Q. L., … Posner, M. I. (2007). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of Unites States of America, 104(43), 17152-17156, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707678104.

[1]	YAN Qin, ZHANG Qingfang. Temporal Processing of Rhythm in Speech: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(5): 607-614.
[2]	LI Shiyi, XIE Yanfeng, ZHAO Guang, BAI Xuejun. The Influence of Media Multitasking Experience on Implicit Memory in Different Attention Patterns [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	LIU Yanyan, LI Jie, ZHAO Qichao, CHEN Beibei, ZHANG Yu. Diffusion of Inhibition of Return in 3D Dynamic and Static Scenes [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 22-28.
[4]	ZHU Huan, XIE Xiaowei, DAI Zheru, TANG Xiaoya, ZANG Jian, WU Jiao, ZANG Xuelian. Semantic Information Takes Precedence over Spatial Location and Glyph Feature in Contextual Cueing with Chinese Characters [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 577-584.
[5]	SU Mingyu, WANG Guangming. STEAM Training Can Improve Pupils’ Attentional Inhibition and Attentional Concentration Ability [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 701-705.
[6]	LI Yunsong, CHEN Qiyang, WU Yan, LI Tianhong, DUAN Rujun. The Dominant Role of Semantic Radicals in Chinese Phonogram Recognition [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.
[7]	CHEN Yan, JIANG Ting, LI Wei, CHEN Qulin, PAN Yun, HU Siyao. Differences of Responsibility Comparison and Distribution Evaluation in Cooperation: An ERPs study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 152-159.
[8]	WU-REN Qimuge, ZHAO Aoxue, WANG Yuhan, ZHUANG Xiangling, MA Guojie. Visual Field Preference and Reference Strategy in Comparative Visual Search [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 166-171.
[9]	GAO Chao, LI Shiyi, ZHANG Peng, ZHAO Guang. Modulation of Depth Perception on Contextual Cueing Effect Based on Binocular Disparity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(1): 16-21,29.
[10]	JIAO Jiangli, LIU Yi, WEN Suxia. Bilingual Advantage of Bilingualism in Emotional Attention Bias [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(5): 590-595.
[11]	CHE Xiaowei, WANG Kaixuan, SHANGGUAN Mengqi, LI Shouxin. The Representation of Attention Template in Visual Working Memory: An EROS Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 297-303.
[12]	MA Lijun, LIANG Junyu, MA Yunxiao. Processing of Homophonic Chinese Two-Part Allegorical Sayings: Effects of Homophonies and Various Lengths of Time Intervals Between First and Second Parts [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 325-331.
[13]	LI Chengshi, BAI Xuejun, WANG Yongsheng. The Influence of Mapping Concreteness and Contextual Clues on Novel Metaphor Processing [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[14]	WU Huifen, LI Xiaona, ZHANG Qiong, TANG Yichun, LIU Huashan. You Own Something Because of Paying Attention to Them: Exploring the Internal Mechanism of Mere Ownership Effect [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(2): 161-167,175.
[15]	TANG Dandan, FU Yu, WU Yanjing, ZHU Hai. Neural Mechanisms of Group Differences in Visuospatial Working Memory [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(2): 176-184.