Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 100-107.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.014
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yingchun HAN1,*(), Linxuan WANG2
Received:
2023-11-21
Online:
2024-01-20
Published:
2024-01-20
Contact:
Yingchun HAN
通讯作者:
韩迎春
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yingchun HAN, Linxuan WANG. Aerobic Exercise, Emotion, and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Fluid Intelligence[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 100-107.
韩迎春, 王琳萱. 有氧运动、情绪与创造力:流体智力的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 100-107.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.014
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
1.有氧运动(平均小时数/天) | 0.74 | 0.51 | |||||||
2.积极情绪 | 28.52 | 6.46 | −0.06 | ||||||
3.消极情绪 | 23.96 | 6.39 | −0.35** | 0.09 | |||||
4.流体智力 | 20.13 | 4.60 | −0.01 | −0.16* | 0.06 | ||||
5.发散思维流畅性 | 6.00 | 2.01 | 0.08 | −0.08 | −0.29** | 0.24** | |||
6.发散思维灵活性 | 4.56 | 1.51 | 0.13 | −0.07 | −0.23** | 0.16* | 0.87** | ||
7.发散思维独特性 | 2.53 | 0.39 | 0.14* | −0.05 | −0.28** | 0.20** | 0.65** | 0.74** | |
8.聚合思维 | 12.72 | 2.73 | 0.30** | 0.25** | −0.21** | 0.11 | 0.27** | 0.30** | 0.17* |
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
1.有氧运动(平均小时数/天) | 0.74 | 0.51 | |||||||
2.积极情绪 | 28.52 | 6.46 | −0.06 | ||||||
3.消极情绪 | 23.96 | 6.39 | −0.35** | 0.09 | |||||
4.流体智力 | 20.13 | 4.60 | −0.01 | −0.16* | 0.06 | ||||
5.发散思维流畅性 | 6.00 | 2.01 | 0.08 | −0.08 | −0.29** | 0.24** | |||
6.发散思维灵活性 | 4.56 | 1.51 | 0.13 | −0.07 | −0.23** | 0.16* | 0.87** | ||
7.发散思维独特性 | 2.53 | 0.39 | 0.14* | −0.05 | −0.28** | 0.20** | 0.65** | 0.74** | |
8.聚合思维 | 12.72 | 2.73 | 0.30** | 0.25** | −0.21** | 0.11 | 0.27** | 0.30** | 0.17* |
预测变量 | 模型1(结果变量:消极情绪) | 模型2(结果变量:发散思维独特性) | 模型3(结果变量:聚合思维) | ||||||||
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | |||
有氧运动 | −4.71 | 0.75 | −6.24*** | 0.32 | 0.19 | 1.69 | −0.91 | 1.41 | −0.64 | ||
消极情绪 | −0.08 | 0.01 | −6.24*** | 0.27 | 0.10 | 2.66** | |||||
流体智力 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −2.78** | 0.37 | 0.15 | 2.52* | |||||
有氧运动×流体智力 | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.67 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1.59 | |||||
消极情绪×流体智力 | 0.003 | 0.00 | 5.34*** | −0.02 | 0.01 | −3.49** | |||||
年龄 | 1.29 | 0.34 | 3.82*** | −0.08 | 0.02 | −4.13*** | −0.19 | 0.15 | −1.23 | ||
性别 | −1.98 | 0.84 | −2.36* | −0.17 | 0.05 | −3.60*** | −1.50 | 0.36 | −4.14*** | ||
R | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.50 | ||||||||
R2 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.25 | ||||||||
F | 19.46*** | 15.89*** | 10.15*** |
预测变量 | 模型1(结果变量:消极情绪) | 模型2(结果变量:发散思维独特性) | 模型3(结果变量:聚合思维) | ||||||||
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | |||
有氧运动 | −4.71 | 0.75 | −6.24*** | 0.32 | 0.19 | 1.69 | −0.91 | 1.41 | −0.64 | ||
消极情绪 | −0.08 | 0.01 | −6.24*** | 0.27 | 0.10 | 2.66** | |||||
流体智力 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −2.78** | 0.37 | 0.15 | 2.52* | |||||
有氧运动×流体智力 | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.67 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1.59 | |||||
消极情绪×流体智力 | 0.003 | 0.00 | 5.34*** | −0.02 | 0.01 | −3.49** | |||||
年龄 | 1.29 | 0.34 | 3.82*** | −0.08 | 0.02 | −4.13*** | −0.19 | 0.15 | −1.23 | ||
性别 | −1.98 | 0.84 | −2.36* | −0.17 | 0.05 | −3.60*** | −1.50 | 0.36 | −4.14*** | ||
R | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.50 | ||||||||
R2 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.25 | ||||||||
F | 19.46*** | 15.89*** | 10.15*** |
结果变量 | 流体智力 | Simple slope | Boot SE | t | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI |
发散思维独特性 | 15.00 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −6.48*** | −0.04 | −0.02 |
21.00 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −3.15** | −0.02 | −0.004 | |
24.00 | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.42 | −0.01 | 0.01 | |
聚合思维 | 15.00 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.45 | −0.06 | 0.09 |
21.00 | −0.08 | 0.03 | −2.89** | −0.14 | −0.03 | |
24.00 | −0.13 | 0.03 | −3.92*** | −0.20 | −0.07 |
结果变量 | 流体智力 | Simple slope | Boot SE | t | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI |
发散思维独特性 | 15.00 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −6.48*** | −0.04 | −0.02 |
21.00 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −3.15** | −0.02 | −0.004 | |
24.00 | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.42 | −0.01 | 0.01 | |
聚合思维 | 15.00 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.45 | −0.06 | 0.09 |
21.00 | −0.08 | 0.03 | −2.89** | −0.14 | −0.03 | |
24.00 | −0.13 | 0.03 | −3.92*** | −0.20 | −0.07 |
程磊, 毛振阳. 有氧运动的若干理论问题的回顾与展望. 体育科技文献通报, 2007, 15 (3): 35- 38.
DOI |
|
赖俊芳. (2019). 跑步有氧运动对创造性思维的影响及其机制探索(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆. | |
宁纪岚. (2023). 有氧运动对创造性思维的影响及大脑的活动特征(硕士学位论文). 上海体育学院. | |
邱林, 郑雪, 王雁飞. 积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)的修订. 应用心理学, 2008, 14 (3): 249- 254, 268. | |
沈汪兵, 刘昌, 施春华, 袁媛. 创造性思维的性别差异. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23 (8): 1380- 1389. | |
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22 (5): 731- 745. | |
姚海娟, 王金霞, 苏清丽, 白学军. 具身情绪与创造性思维: 情境性调节定向的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16 (4): 441- 448. | |
张娜. (2020). 自我损耗、情绪类型与情绪调节策略对创造性的影响(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉. | |
Aga, K., Inamura, M., Chen, C., Hagiwara, K., Yamashita, R., Hirotsu, M., ... Nakagawa, S.. The effect of acute aerobic exercise on divergent and convergent thinking and its influence by mood. Brain Sciences, 2021, 11 (5): 546.
DOI |
|
Basch, M. F. (1996). Affect and defense. In D. L. Nathanson (Ed.), Knowing feeling: Affect, script, and psychotherapy (pp. 257–269). New York: W.W. Norton. | |
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309–319. | |
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M.. The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 2014, 42 (7): 1186- 1197. | |
Bernstein, E. E., & Mcnally, R. J.. Acute aerobic exercise helps overcome emotion regulation deficits. Cognition and Emotion, 2017, 31 (4): 834- 843.
DOI |
|
Bollimbala, A., & James, P. S. (2023). Impact of chronic physical activity on individuals’ creativity. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01862-4 | |
Bollimbala, A., James, P. S., & Ganguli, S.. The impact of physical activity intervention on creativity: Role of flexibility vs persistence pathways. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2023, 49, 101313.
DOI |
|
Cancer, A., Iannello, P., Salvi, C., & Antonietti, A.. Executive functioning and divergent thinking predict creative problem-solving in young adults and elderlies. Psychological Research, 2023, 87 (2): 388- 396.
DOI |
|
Cattell, R. B.. Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963, 54 (1): 1- 22.
DOI |
|
Chang, Y. K., Labban, J. D., Gapin, J. I., & Etnier, J. L.. The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Brain Research, 2012, 1453, 87- 101.
DOI |
|
Chrysikou, E. G.. Creativity in and out of (cognitive) control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2019, 27, 94- 99.
DOI |
|
Daugherty, A. M., Sutton, B. P., Hillman, C. H., Kramer, A. F., Cohen, N. J., & Barbey, A. K.. Individual differences in the neurobiology of fluid intelligence predict responsiveness to training: Evidence from a comprehensive cognitive, mindfulness meditation, and aerobic exercise intervention. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2020, 18, 100123.
DOI |
|
Demanet, J., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F.. Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: A voluntary task-switching study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2011, 2, 336. | |
Donnegan, F. K., Setti, A., & Allen, A. P. (2018). Exercise and creativity: Can one bout of yoga improve convergent and divergent thinking? Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2(2), 193–199. | |
Firth, J., Stubbs, B., Vancampfort, D., Schuch, F., Lagopoulos, J., Rosenbaum, S., & Ward, P. B.. Effect of aerobic exercise on hippocampal volume in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 2018, 166, 230- 238.
DOI |
|
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C.. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 2005, 19 (3): 313- 332.
DOI |
|
Gable, P., & Harmon-Jones, E.. The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: Attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science, 2010, 21 (2): 211- 215.
DOI |
|
Gerver, C. R., Griffin, J. W., Dennis, N. A., & Beaty, R. E.. Memory and creativity: A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between memory systems and creative cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2023, 30 (6): 2116- 2154. | |
He, J., Li, F. F., Xue, Y., & Ma, R.. Association among motor skills and fluid intelligence in children aged from 5 to 7 years with different sports skill learning. Early Child Development and Care, 2023, 193 (15−16): 1530- 1542.
DOI |
|
Jones, E. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2009). No pain, no gains: Negative mood leads to process gains in idea-generation groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(2), 75–88. | |
Lamoth, C. J. C., & van Heuvelen, M. J. G.. Sports activities are reflected in the local stability and regularity of body sway: Older ice-skaters have better postural control than inactive elderly. Gait & Posture, 2012, 35 (3): 489- 493. | |
Lang, P. J.. Emotion and motivation: Toward consensus definitions and a common research purpose. Emotion Review, 2010, 2 (3): 229- 233.
DOI |
|
Mastria, S., Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G. E. (2019). How does emotion influence the creativity evaluation of exogenous alternative ideas? PLoS One, 14(7), e0219298. | |
Mitchell, R. L. C., & Phillips, L. H.. The psychological, neurochemical and functional neuroanatomical mediators of the effects of positive and negative mood on executive functions. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45 (4): 617- 629.
DOI |
|
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J.. Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 2011, 39 (1): 36- 45.
DOI |
|
Olderbak, S., Semmler, M., & Doebler, P.. Four-branch model of ability emotional intelligence with fluid and crystallized intelligence: A meta-analysis of relations. Emotion Review, 2019, 11 (2): 166- 183.
DOI |
|
Opitz, P. C., Lee, I. A., Gross, J. J., & Urry, H. L.. Fluid cognitive ability is a resource for successful emotion regulation in older and younger adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, 5, 609. | |
Schuch, F. B., Vancampfort, D., Firth, J., Rosenbaum, S., Ward, P. B., Silva, E. S., ... Stubbs, B.. Physical activity and incident depression: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2018, 175 (7): 631- 648.
DOI |
|
Silvia, P. J. (2011). Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 24–30. | |
Smith, P. J., Blumenthal, J. A., Hoffman, B. M., Cooper, H., Strauman, T. A., Welsh-Bohmer, K., ... Sherwood, A.. Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2010, 72 (3): 239- 252.
DOI |
|
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press. | |
Talukdar, T., Nikolaidi, A., Zwilling, C. E., Paul, E. J., Hillman, C. H., Cohen, N. J., ... Barbey, A. K.. Aerobic fitness explains individual differences in the functional brain connectome of healthy young adults. Cerebral Cortex, 2018, 28 (10): 3600- 3609.
DOI |
|
Zhu, Y., Zhong, Q., Ji, J., Ma, J. H., Wu, H., Gao, Y. X., ... Wang, T.. Effects of aerobic dance on cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2020, 74 (2): 679- 690.
DOI |
[1] | BAI Boren, ZHOU Xiang, ZHANG Jingjing, CUI Yuxin. Artificial Intelligence Narcissism Enhances Human-Agent Collaborative Innovation Willingness and Its Mechanisms [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(1): 137-144. |
[2] | Ke ZHANG, Xiumin DU, Liyan LI, Xuehan ZHANG, Haixia ZHAO. Studies on the Relationship Between Sour Taste and Creativity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 815-823. |
[3] | Xiaoshi LIU, Jingwen LI, Lei ZHANG, Cheng XIANG, Yun WU. Relationships Between Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Effect of Creativity and the Moderating Effect of Security [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 138-144. |
[4] | LI Wenfu, ZHAI Jicun, LI Qingqing, CHEN Jingting. The Effect of Ego Depletion on the Prototype Elicitation Effects of Scientific Innovation Problems Solving [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(5): 677-683. |
[5] | LI Jiaojiao, LIU Xiaobing, PEI Dandan, XU Bibo, YIN Xiyang. The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and College Students’ Malicious Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 563-569. |
[6] | XUE Yukang, TIAN Mengyuan, LI Qianqian, GUO Yaqi, MA Xiaoqing, GU Chuanhua. The Microgenetic Change of Social Creativity: A Study Based on Virtual Simulation Technique [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 65-72. |
[7] | CHEN Lanshuang, SONG Huimin, DONG Jing, ZHAO Huan, ZHANG Zhen. The Association and Mechanism Between Organizational Integration and Depressive Symptoms Among Students of the University of the Third Age [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 706-713. |
[8] | MIAO Miao, GAN Yiqun. The Predictive Effects of Presence of Meaning in Life on Future-Oriented Coping: The Chain Mediating Role of Positive Affect and Resource Accumulation [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 403-409. |
[9] | DU Xiayu, SHI Congrong, ZHAO Ziyi, XUE Ting. The Influence of Emotional Valence and Motivational Emotion on Creativity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 160-165. |
[10] | LI Yongjie, LIU Chunhui, JIN Hua. A Study on the Group Differences of Undergraduates with High-Level Creativity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(4): 440-445. |
[11] | LI Ang, ZHANG Jinghuan. The Prediction of Parent-Child Relationship and Empathy on Adolescents’ Social Creativity: The Mediating Role of Friendship Quality [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(4): 496-502. |
[12] | WANG Zhanqi, ZHANG Xingli. The Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 390-397. |
[13] | GONG Zhenxing, ZHANG Ying, LI Xinmin, ZHANG Tiantian. Seeking Consensus can Find Differences: The Impact of the Heterogeneity of the Learning Goal Orientation Between Leader and Subordinate on Creativity [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(1): 128-135. |
[14] | ZHANG Xin, SONG Jintao, YING Ronghua, ZHOU Renlai. Is Effectiveness of Working Memory Training the Result of Placebo Effect? [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(2): 170-177. |
[15] | PING Anjun, PENG Kaiping. Gratitude Facilitates Self-Control [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(3): 378-383,420. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||