
Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 448-455.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.04.003
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wenjing LI*,1,2,3(
), Wen SUN1,2, Haidi ZHU1,2
Received:2025-01-06
Online:2025-07-20
Published:2025-07-20
Contact:
Wenjing LI
通讯作者:
李文静
基金资助:Wenjing LI, Wen SUN, Haidi ZHU. The Influence of Popular Background Music on Leisure Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(4): 448-455.
李文静, 孙雯, 朱海迪. 流行背景音乐对休闲阅读的影响:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(4): 448-455.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.04.003
| 指标 | 有背景音乐组 | 无背景音乐组 | t | p | d | |||
| M | SD | M | SD | |||||
| 保持测验 | 4.25 | 1.52 | 6.26 | 1.21 | 4.83 | <0.001 | 1.46 | |
| 迁移测验 | 5.85 | 1.46 | 7.22 | 1.39 | 3.14 | 0.003 | 0.96 | |
| 材料心理努力 | 4.00 | 1.59 | 4.35 | 1.75 | 0.68 | 0.501 | 0.21 | |
| 材料难度感知 | 3.35 | 1.23 | 3.61 | 1.16 | 0.71 | 0.481 | 0.22 | |
| 问卷心理努力 | 4.30 | 1.17 | 5.17 | 1.30 | 2.30 | 0.027 | 0.70 | |
| 问卷难度感知 | 4.30 | 1.03 | 4.74 | 1.01 | 1.41 | 0.167 | 0.36 | |
| 阅读理解率(%) | 42 | 9 | 56 | 9 | 5.00 | <0.001 | 1.56 | |
| 有效阅读速度 | 3.95 | 1.41 | 4.79 | 1.14 | 2.16 | 0.036 | 0.66 | |
| 指标 | 有背景音乐组 | 无背景音乐组 | t | p | d | |||
| M | SD | M | SD | |||||
| 保持测验 | 4.25 | 1.52 | 6.26 | 1.21 | 4.83 | <0.001 | 1.46 | |
| 迁移测验 | 5.85 | 1.46 | 7.22 | 1.39 | 3.14 | 0.003 | 0.96 | |
| 材料心理努力 | 4.00 | 1.59 | 4.35 | 1.75 | 0.68 | 0.501 | 0.21 | |
| 材料难度感知 | 3.35 | 1.23 | 3.61 | 1.16 | 0.71 | 0.481 | 0.22 | |
| 问卷心理努力 | 4.30 | 1.17 | 5.17 | 1.30 | 2.30 | 0.027 | 0.70 | |
| 问卷难度感知 | 4.30 | 1.03 | 4.74 | 1.01 | 1.41 | 0.167 | 0.36 | |
| 阅读理解率(%) | 42 | 9 | 56 | 9 | 5.00 | <0.001 | 1.56 | |
| 有效阅读速度 | 3.95 | 1.41 | 4.79 | 1.14 | 2.16 | 0.036 | 0.66 | |
| 兴趣区 | 指标 | 有背景音乐组 | 无背景音乐组 | t | p | d | |||
| M | SD | M | SD | ||||||
| 题目 | 首次进入时间(s) | 2.59 | 2.67 | 1.27 | 0.61 | −2.31 | 0.026 | 0.68 | |
| 首次进入次数 | 6.80 | 7.99 | 3.17 | 1.15 | −2.15 | 0.037 | 0.63 | ||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 2.34 | 1.65 | 2.31 | 2.34 | −0.04 | 0.968 | 0.01 | ||
| 总注视时间(s) | 27.22 | 16.21 | 27.96 | 12.16 | 0.17 | 0.864 | 0.05 | ||
| 总注视次数 | 52.65 | 27.20 | 54.09 | 17.94 | 0.21 | 0.837 | 0.06 | ||
| 正文 | 首次进入时间(s) | 516.99 | 192.75 | 542.67 | 132.66 | 0.51 | 0.610 | 0.16 | |
| 首次进入次数 | 862.45 | 253.17 | 930.52 | 303.36 | 0.79 | 0.433 | 0.24 | ||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 18.14 | 11.25 | 19.00 | 11.94 | 0.24 | 0.810 | 0.07 | ||
| 总注视时间(s) | 266.51 | 114.60 | 271.36 | 64.51 | 0.17 | 0.863 | 0.05 | ||
| 总注视次数 | 541.23 | 166.32 | 583.73 | 199.48 | 0.75 | 0.456 | 0.23 | ||
| 兴趣区 | 指标 | 有背景音乐组 | 无背景音乐组 | t | p | d | |||
| M | SD | M | SD | ||||||
| 题目 | 首次进入时间(s) | 2.59 | 2.67 | 1.27 | 0.61 | −2.31 | 0.026 | 0.68 | |
| 首次进入次数 | 6.80 | 7.99 | 3.17 | 1.15 | −2.15 | 0.037 | 0.63 | ||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 2.34 | 1.65 | 2.31 | 2.34 | −0.04 | 0.968 | 0.01 | ||
| 总注视时间(s) | 27.22 | 16.21 | 27.96 | 12.16 | 0.17 | 0.864 | 0.05 | ||
| 总注视次数 | 52.65 | 27.20 | 54.09 | 17.94 | 0.21 | 0.837 | 0.06 | ||
| 正文 | 首次进入时间(s) | 516.99 | 192.75 | 542.67 | 132.66 | 0.51 | 0.610 | 0.16 | |
| 首次进入次数 | 862.45 | 253.17 | 930.52 | 303.36 | 0.79 | 0.433 | 0.24 | ||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 18.14 | 11.25 | 19.00 | 11.94 | 0.24 | 0.810 | 0.07 | ||
| 总注视时间(s) | 266.51 | 114.60 | 271.36 | 64.51 | 0.17 | 0.863 | 0.05 | ||
| 总注视次数 | 541.23 | 166.32 | 583.73 | 199.48 | 0.75 | 0.456 | 0.23 | ||
| 指标 | 低背景音乐熟悉度 | 高背景音乐熟悉度 | |||||||||
| 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | ||||||||
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||
| 保持测验 | 5.05 | 1.46 | 6.05 | 1.43 | 5.88 | 1.37 | 6.93 | 1.13 | |||
| 迁移测验 | 7.10 | 1.85 | 5.95 | 1.87 | 6.70 | 1.31 | 6.88 | 1.92 | |||
| 材料心理努力 | 3.95 | 1.42 | 3.80 | 1.85 | 4.05 | 1.36 | 3.60 | 1.31 | |||
| 材料难度感知 | 3.45 | 1.00 | 3.15 | 1.18 | 3.55 | 0.89 | 2.80 | 1.15 | |||
| 问卷心理努力 | 4.75 | 1.33 | 4.25 | 1.68 | 4.75 | 1.02 | 4.35 | 1.09 | |||
| 问卷难度感知 | 4.60 | 1.14 | 3.95 | 1.23 | 4.60 | 0.75 | 4.00 | 0.97 | |||
| 阅读理解率(%) | 50.63 | 12.17 | 50.00 | 11.67 | 52.40 | 8.34 | 57.50 | 9.92 | |||
| 有效阅读速度 | 4.35 | 1.13 | 5.25 | 1.77 | 5.19 | 1.66 | 6.18 | 2.22 | |||
| 指标 | 低背景音乐熟悉度 | 高背景音乐熟悉度 | |||||||||
| 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | ||||||||
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||
| 保持测验 | 5.05 | 1.46 | 6.05 | 1.43 | 5.88 | 1.37 | 6.93 | 1.13 | |||
| 迁移测验 | 7.10 | 1.85 | 5.95 | 1.87 | 6.70 | 1.31 | 6.88 | 1.92 | |||
| 材料心理努力 | 3.95 | 1.42 | 3.80 | 1.85 | 4.05 | 1.36 | 3.60 | 1.31 | |||
| 材料难度感知 | 3.45 | 1.00 | 3.15 | 1.18 | 3.55 | 0.89 | 2.80 | 1.15 | |||
| 问卷心理努力 | 4.75 | 1.33 | 4.25 | 1.68 | 4.75 | 1.02 | 4.35 | 1.09 | |||
| 问卷难度感知 | 4.60 | 1.14 | 3.95 | 1.23 | 4.60 | 0.75 | 4.00 | 0.97 | |||
| 阅读理解率(%) | 50.63 | 12.17 | 50.00 | 11.67 | 52.40 | 8.34 | 57.50 | 9.92 | |||
| 有效阅读速度 | 4.35 | 1.13 | 5.25 | 1.77 | 5.19 | 1.66 | 6.18 | 2.22 | |||
| 兴趣区 | 指标 | 低背景音乐熟悉度 | 高背景音乐熟悉度 | |||||||||
| 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | |||||||||
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |||||
| 题目 | 首次进入时间(s) | 1.87 | 1.33 | 1.18 | 0.85 | 1.28 | 0.57 | 1.24 | 0.56 | |||
| 首次进入次数 | 4.72 | 2.97 | 3.53 | 2.21 | 3.20 | 1.77 | 3.78 | 1.79 | ||||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 1.88 | 0.90 | 2.85 | 2.16 | 1.66 | 0.93 | 2.20 | 1.26 | ||||
| 总注视时间(s) | 23.21 | 11.87 | 24.99 | 11.85 | 21.83 | 14.34 | 20.59 | 16.10 | ||||
| 总注视次数 | 55.10 | 28.20 | 49.05 | 19.47 | 48.85 | 30.65 | 38.85 | 22.34 | ||||
| 正文 | 首次进入时间(s) | 567.31 | 201.79 | 464.21 | 157.51 | 497.77 | 173.47 | 447.99 | 212.08 | |||
| 首次进入次数 | 844.12 | 214.26 | 690.57 | 221.96 | 747.77 | 263.91 | 624.62 | 205.59 | ||||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 16.42 | 9.14 | 15.52 | 6.61 | 14.96 | 7.13 | 18.50 | 9.97 | ||||
| 总注视时间(s) | 278.90 | 115.06 | 242.73 | 98.42 | 252.72 | 97.03 | 244.46 | 106.53 | ||||
| 总注视次数 | 608.66 | 160.66 | 507.73 | 179.63 | 566.74 | 202.01 | 502.05 | 177.03 | ||||
| 兴趣区 | 指标 | 低背景音乐熟悉度 | 高背景音乐熟悉度 | |||||||||
| 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | 低知识经验 | 高知识经验 | |||||||||
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |||||
| 题目 | 首次进入时间(s) | 1.87 | 1.33 | 1.18 | 0.85 | 1.28 | 0.57 | 1.24 | 0.56 | |||
| 首次进入次数 | 4.72 | 2.97 | 3.53 | 2.21 | 3.20 | 1.77 | 3.78 | 1.79 | ||||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 1.88 | 0.90 | 2.85 | 2.16 | 1.66 | 0.93 | 2.20 | 1.26 | ||||
| 总注视时间(s) | 23.21 | 11.87 | 24.99 | 11.85 | 21.83 | 14.34 | 20.59 | 16.10 | ||||
| 总注视次数 | 55.10 | 28.20 | 49.05 | 19.47 | 48.85 | 30.65 | 38.85 | 22.34 | ||||
| 正文 | 首次进入时间(s) | 567.31 | 201.79 | 464.21 | 157.51 | 497.77 | 173.47 | 447.99 | 212.08 | |||
| 首次进入次数 | 844.12 | 214.26 | 690.57 | 221.96 | 747.77 | 263.91 | 624.62 | 205.59 | ||||
| 首次注视时间(s) | 16.42 | 9.14 | 15.52 | 6.61 | 14.96 | 7.13 | 18.50 | 9.97 | ||||
| 总注视时间(s) | 278.90 | 115.06 | 242.73 | 98.42 | 252.72 | 97.03 | 244.46 | 106.53 | ||||
| 总注视次数 | 608.66 | 160.66 | 507.73 | 179.63 | 566.74 | 202.01 | 502.05 | 177.03 | ||||
|
曹永管. (2011). 趣味经济学 (千太阳, 芦俊浩 译). 北京: 电子工业出版社.
|
|
|
陈丹, 隋雪, 王小东, 钱丽, 姜娜. 音乐对大学生阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 2008, 31 (2): 385- 388.
DOI |
|
|
陈友庆, 吴芸芸. 音乐的类型和节奏对记忆的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2015, 23 (2): 300- 303.
|
|
|
邓善文, 杨好, 左康洁, 张晶晶. 音乐经验对第二语言加工的影响. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31 (11): 2040- 2049.
|
|
|
段朝辉. (2015). 大脑更喜欢印刷书本还是电子书?——影响电子阅读效率的因素(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
|
|
|
高淇, 白学军. 中英流行背景音乐对大学生中英词汇记忆的影响. 心理学报, 2018, 50 (1): 1- 8.
|
|
|
龚德英, 刘电芝, 张大均. 概述和音乐对认知负荷和多媒体学习的影响. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24 (1): 83- 87.
|
|
|
惠良虹, 王勃然. 大学生数字原住民特征对在线英语学习投入的影响研究. 外语界, 2022, (1): 83- 91.
|
|
|
李文静, 童钰, 王福兴, 康素杰, 刘华山, 杨超. 动画教学代理对多媒体学习的影响: 学习者经验与偏好的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32 (4): 453- 462.
|
|
|
梁菲菲, 刘瑛, 贺斐, 冯琳琳, 王峥, 白学军. 中文阅读伴随词汇学习中的视觉复杂性效应: 基于笔画数和词长的证据. 心理学报, 2024, 56 (12): 1734- 1750.
|
|
|
邵泓宁, 郭莎莎, 程铭, 李文辉. 背景音乐影响小学生阅读理解的眼动研究. 心理研究, 2024, 17 (5): 470- 477.
|
|
|
田玉荣, 袁悦, 陈亚楠, 王明辉. (2024). 聆听音乐对人际距离的影响. 见 2024·中国音乐家协会音乐心理学学会第八届学术研讨会论文集(p. 33). 郑州: 中国音乐家协会音乐心理学学会.
|
|
|
吴梦真. (2023). 背景音乐对学术阅读理解效果和情绪体验的影响(硕士学位论文). 苏州大学.
|
|
|
谢和平, 安婧, 王福兴. 多媒体学习中的图文整合: 同步化线索和学习者经验的作用. 心理科学, 2017, 40 (5): 1104- 1110.
|
|
|
闫国利. (2004). 眼动分析法在心理学研究中的应用. 天津: 天津教育出版社.
|
|
|
杨萌, 王剑桥, 夏裕祁, 杨帆, 张学民. 背景音乐的节奏与歌词语言熟悉程度对驾驶行为及眼动的影响. 心理科学, 2011, 34 (5): 1056- 1061.
|
|
|
张冬梅. 音乐如何影响人们的情绪和行为. 科学之友, 2024, (7): 150- 151.
DOI |
|
|
赵格静. 背景音乐的熟悉性和节奏对大学生中文词汇记忆的影响. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11 (5): 1981- 1987.
|
|
|
Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 2009, 19 (2): 246- 251.
DOI |
|
|
Cauchard, F., Cane, J. E., & Weger, U. W. Influence of background speech and music in interrupted reading: An eye-tracking study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012, 26 (3): 381- 390.
DOI |
|
|
Charness, N., Reingold, E. M., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 2001, 29 (8): 1146- 1152.
|
|
|
Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001, 8 (2): 331- 335.
|
|
|
Grande, P. C., González, A., Goytia, P. D., Chamorro, E., Cleva, J. M., Alonso, J., & Gómez-Pedrero, J. A. Evaluation of reading performance with progressive power lenses using eye tracking technology. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2022, 63 (7): 1816.
|
|
|
Jäncke, L., Brügger, E., Brummer, M., Scherrer, S., & Alahmadi, N. Verbal learning in the context of background music: No influence of vocals and instrumentals on verbal learning. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2014, 10 (1): 10.
DOI |
|
|
Jäncke, L., & Sandmann, P. Music listening while you learn: No influence of background music on verbal learning. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2010, 6 (1): 3.
DOI |
|
|
Kalyuga, S. (2021). The expertise reversal principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 171–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
|
Kämpfe, J., Sedlmeier, P., & Renkewitz, F. The impact of background music on adult listeners: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Music, 2011, 39 (4): 424- 448.
DOI |
|
|
Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, 67, 135- 142.
DOI |
|
|
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. Measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning: A comparison of different objective measures. Instructional Science, 2017, 45 (4): 515- 536.
DOI |
|
|
Lehmann, J. A. M., & Seufert, T. The influence of background music on learning in the light of different theoretical perspectives and the role of working memory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8, 297754.
|
|
|
Li, W. J., Kuang, Z. Y., Leng, X. X., Mayer, R. E., & Wang, F. X. Role of gesturing onscreen instructors in video lectures: A set of three-level meta-analyses on the embodiment effect. Educational Psychology Review, 2024, 36 (3): 67.
DOI |
|
|
Liu, Y. Investigating users’ willingness of acceptance for background music service in intelligent library. Library Hi Tech, 2022, 40 (1): 33- 44.
DOI |
|
|
Meng, Z., Lan, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2020). Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10), 1892–1905.
|
|
|
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2021). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 73–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
|
Patel, A. D. Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 2003, 6 (7): 674- 681.
DOI |
|
|
Rayner, K. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506.
DOI |
|
|
Sammler, D., & Elmer, S. Advances in the neurocognition of music and language. Brain Sciences, 2020, 10 (8): 509.
DOI |
|
|
Souza, A. S., & Barbosa, L. C. L. Should we turn off the music? Music with lyrics interferes with cognitive tasks. Journal of Cognition, 2023, 6 (1): 24.
DOI |
|
|
Sun, Y. P., Sun, C. N., Li, C., Shao, X. R., Liu, Q. M., & Liu, H. E. Impact of background music on reading comprehension: Influence of lyrics language and study habits. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15, 1363562.
DOI |
|
|
Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Letnic, A. K. Fast and loud background music disrupts reading comprehension. Psychology of Music, 2012, 40 (6): 700- 708.
DOI |
|
|
Ulvinen, E., Psyridou, M., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., Siekkinen, M., & Torppa, M. Developmental leisure reading profiles and their association with reading skills across Grades 1-9. Learning and Individual Differences, 2024, 109, 102387.
DOI |
|
|
Vasilev, M. R., Kirkby, J. A., & Angele, B. Auditory distraction during reading: A Bayesian meta-analysis of a continuing controversy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2018, 13 (5): 567- 597.
DOI |
|
|
Yin, C. X., Li, L. R., & Yu, L. Why do college students engage in in-class media multitasking behaviours? A social learning perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2024, 55 (3): 1105- 1125.
DOI |
| [1] | Yufei DU, Zhichao ZHANG, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG. Semantics Takes Precedence over World Knowledge in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Movements [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(2): 153-160. |
| [2] | Xiangwen CHEN, Longge WANG, Huilan HU, Zhichao ZHANG, Mengsi WANG, Qiang WANG, Manman ZHANG. The Neural Structural Basis of Individual Differences in Word Frequency Effect on Eye Movement Measures During Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(6): 721-729. |
| [3] | Yuqing JIA, Tongqi GAO, Guoli YAN. Eye Movements in Silent and Oral Sentence Reading Among Chinese First Graders [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 633-641. |
| [4] | Wen ZHANG, Chao KAN, Limin GUO, Zhihe LIU, Yang LIU. A Study on the Cognitive Processing Characteristics of Perceptual Anticipation in Volleyball Players’ Reception of Smashes: Correlated Evidence from Eye Movements and fNIRS [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(4): 562-569. |
| [5] | Yingchao WANG, Sainan LI, Ziming SONG, Guoli YAN. The Influence of Reading Mode on Word Frequency Effect in Chinese Sentence Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 183-188, 226. |
| [6] | Ruqi CHEN, Yaqian BAO, Linjieqiong HUANG, Xingshan LI. An Introduction to the Chinese Reading Model (CRM) [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 725-735. |
| [7] | Zijia LU, Zhichao ZHANG, Ying FU, Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG, Xuejun BAI. Repeating Words Cannot Help Chinese Readers to Obtain Word Class Information from Parafoveal Words [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 577-584. |
| [8] | LI Shiyi, XIE Yanfeng, ZHAO Guang, BAI Xuejun. The Influence of Media Multitasking Experience on Implicit Memory in Different Attention Patterns [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 433-440. |
| [9] | KANG Lichao, LAN Zebo, HAN Yinghong. The Effect of Repeated Reading on the 4 to 5 Years Old Children’s Print Attention in Different Reading Styles [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(3): 368-374. |
| [10] | WU-REN Qimuge, ZHAO Aoxue, WANG Yuhan, ZHUANG Xiangling, MA Guojie. Visual Field Preference and Reference Strategy in Comparative Visual Search [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 166-171. |
| [11] | GONG Shaoying, HAN Yusi, WANG Zhen, XU Sheng, LIU Xiaoxian. Effects of Complexity of Computer-based Feedback and Prior Knowledge on Learning [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(6): 765-772. |
| [12] | SHEN Yinglun, MENG Zhu, LAN Zebo, WANG Yingchao, YAN Guoli. Repeated Reading of English Passage for Chinese College Students: An Eye-Tracking Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(4): 464-470. |
| [13] | Chen Shunsen, Lin Caiyun, Ren Jie. Motion Features of Target Stimuli Modulate Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(3): 392-399. |
| [14] | Wang Botao, Duan Haijun, Han Qin, Hu Weiping,. The Influence of Inter-Hemispheric Interaction on Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(2): 211-217. |
| [15] | Liu Zhifang, Wang Ruoyi, Zhang Zhijun, Liu Wei. Saccadic Targeting Based on Character and Word in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Disappearing Text [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(1): 27-35. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||