测验与反馈在分段视频学习中的作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分段原则是多媒体和视频学习中通过分段促进学习的重要原则。本研究探讨了测验和反馈对分段的影响。实验1对比了观看分段视频和在分段中进行测验两种情境，结果表明分段中测验会提高学习表现。实验2对比了分段视频、分段中测验和分段中测验并提供反馈三种情境。结果发现分段组与分段测验组之间没有差异，接受反馈的学习者学习表现最好。结果表明在分段视频中测验和反馈具有积极效应，对多媒体和线上学习具有潜在的意义。

关键词: 分段, 反馈, 测验, 视频学习, 多媒体学习

Abstract: The segmentation principle is an important principle to promote learning in multimedia and video learning. This study explored the effects of testing and feedback on segmentation. Experiment 1 compared two conditions of watching segmented video and testing during segmented pauses. Results showed that testing during pauses improved learning performance. Experiment 2 compared three conditions of watching segmented video, testing during pauses, and testing and receiving feedback during pauses. Results showed that there was no difference between testing group and video group; and learners who received feedback performed best on tests. The results indicate that testing and feedback in segmented videos have positive effects and potential significance for multimedia and online learning.

Key words: segmentation, feedback, testing, video learning, multimedia learning

中图分类号:

B844

冷晓雪, 成美霞, 王福兴. 测验与反馈在分段视频学习中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 52-58.

LENG Xiaoxue, CHENG Meixia, WANG Fuxing. The Effects of Testing and Feedback on Segmentation Principle in Video Learning[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 52-58.

参考文献

马安然, 王燕青, 王福兴, 周治金. (2021). 教学微视频的播放速度对学习效果的影响. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 391–399
王燕青. (2020). 积极分段对视频学习效果的影响: 总结的作用 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 695–700, doi: 10.1002/acp.1343.
Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(2), 111–127, doi: 10.2190/9LMD-3U28-3A0G-FTQT.
Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133.
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 290–298, doi: 10.1037/a0031026.
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 604–616.
Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 633–642.
Chang, C. C., Liang, C. Y., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218–227, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.031.
Cheon, J., Chung, S., Crooks, S. M., Song, J., & Kim, J. (2014). An investigation of the effects of different types of activities during pauses in a segmented instructional animation. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 293–306.
De Jonge, M., Tabbers, H. K., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2015). The effect of testing on the retention of coherent and incoherent text material. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 305–315, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9300-z.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191, doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9.
Hanham, J., Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2017). Cognitive load theory, element interactivity, and the testing and reverse testing effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 265–280, doi: 10.1002/acp.3324.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 621–629, doi: 10.1037/a0015183.
Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 317–326, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9309-3.
Khacharem, A., Spanjers, I. A. E., Zoudji, B., Kalyuga, S., & Ripoll, H. (2013). Using segmentation to support the learning from animated soccer scenes: An effect of prior knowledge. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(2), 154–160, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.006.
Lawson, A. P., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Benefits of writing an explanation during pauses in multimedia lessons. Educational Psychology Review, doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09594-w.
Leahy, W., Hanham, J., & Sweller, J. (2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 291–304, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9296-4.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 57–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390–397, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390.
Mayer, R. E., & Pilegard, C. (2014). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 316–344). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4, doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1.
Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463, doi: 10.1037/a0037559.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189, doi: 10.3102/0034654307313795.
Stiller, K. D., Freitag, A., Zinnbauer, P., & Freitag, C. (2009). How pacing of multimedia instructions can influence modality effects: A case of superiority of visual texts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 184–203.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296, doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205.
van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2015). Not new, but nearly forgotten: The testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 247–264, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9310-x.

[1]	王怀勇, 岳思怡, 沈晓寻. 授权型领导对员工反馈寻求行为的影响机制：领导差异化授权两阶段的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 130-137.
[2]	陈怡馨, 张琪涵, 夏依旦, 赵冰洁, 白学军. 同步性联合运动中对他人的运动预测：反馈线索的关键作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 743-749.
[3]	苏明宇, 王光明. STEAM训练提升小学生的注意抑制与注意集中能力[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 701-705.
[4]	赵婷婷, 杨晓梦, 张洋, 王燕青, 谢和平, 王福兴. 多媒体学习中线索原则是否存在经验逆转效应？——来自两项元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 22-29.
[5]	吴鹏, 袁泉, 范晶. 叠音人名的婴儿图式效应及其对人际信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 557-563.
[6]	巩振兴, 张莹, 李新敏, 张甜甜. 求同方能存异：上下级学习目标导向契合对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 128-135.
[7]	龚少英, 韩雨丝, 王祯, 徐升, 刘小先. 基于计算机的反馈复杂性和先前知识对学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 765-772.
[8]	吴三美, 王敬欣, 何先友, 田良苏, 赵雪汝, 陈广耀. 心理距离概念水平上的趋利避害相容效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 488-495.
[9]	张娟, 张大均. 大学生心理素质水平与正性负性情绪的外显和内隐相关[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 91-96.
[10]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[11]	侯娟, 黄佳妮, 方晓义. 个体理想伴侣偏好的内隐—外显性差异研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 551-561.
[12]	龚少英, 张盼盼, 上官晨雨. 学习者控制和任务难度对多媒体学习的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 335-342.
[13]	周宗奎, 刘庆奇, 杨秀娟, 孙晓军. 社交网站使用对青少年孤独感的影响：链式中介效应分析*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 155-161.
[14]	连帅磊, 田媛, 孙晓军, 张晨艳,. 主动性社交网站使用与青少年友谊质量的关系：积极反馈和人际不确定性的中介作用*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 197-204.
[15]	阴国恩,苏娟, 于木兰, 刘海燕,. 会计专业人员职业道德行为倾向研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 264-269.