教师的语言形式对儿童语言理解的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.009

心理与行为研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 59-64.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.009

教师的语言形式对儿童语言理解的影响

张环^1,2,3, 左天然², 姜维², 裴铃茹², 吴瑕^1,2,3

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387

收稿日期:2021-07-02 发布日期:2022-01-20
通讯作者: 吴瑕,E-mail:wuxia@tjnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
天津师范大学教学改革项目青年教师专项（JG01221019）；天津师范大学教学改革项目（JGYB01220016）

The Influence of Teachers’ Descriptions in Dialogue on Children’s Language Comprehension

ZHANG Huan^1,2,3, ZUO Tianran², JIANG Wei², PEI Lingru², WU Xia^1,2,3

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387

Received:2021-07-02 Published:2022-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为考察教师的不同语言形式对儿童语言理解的影响，采用独白、半对话和全对话三种语言形式材料，要求不同年级儿童在不同的语言形式条件下完成七巧板图形的识别任务。结果显示，一年级儿童在全对话和半对话语言条件下的正确识别率均显著高于独白语言条件；三年级儿童在全对话语言条件下的正确识别率显著高于独白语言条件；五年级儿童在全对话语言条件下的正确识别率显著高于独白和半对话语言条件。结果说明，在不同年级儿童中，教师的对话语言以不同的内在过程影响儿童的语言理解，这为了解“对话语言易于理解”的发展性机制提供了依据。

关键词: 语言形式, 语言理解, 学龄期儿童, 对话语言, 独白语言

Abstract: Previous studies showed that dialogue language can be better understood by the listener than monologue language. To investigate the influence of teachers’ descriptions in dialogue on school-age children’s language comprehension and its underlying mechanisms, different grade (first-, third-, and fifth-grade) of school-age children listened to the recordings of teachers from a tangram-description task, and attempted to identify the described target. The results showed that the correct recognition percentage of first-grade children in full-dialogue condition and half-dialogue condition were significantly higher than that in monologue condition. However, no significant difference of the third-grade children under three conditions was found. Importantly, the accuracy of the fifth-grade children in full-dialogue condition was significantly higher than that in monologue and half-dialogue conditions. These results can provide empirical evidence for the processes and mechanisms of how teachers’ descriptions affect children’s language comprehension in online and offline educational situation, and can help school-age children to better understand the knowledge given by teachers in the learning process and improve their language comprehension abilities.

Key words: descriptions, language comprehension, school-age children, dialogue, monologue

中图分类号:

B844

张环, 左天然, 姜维, 裴铃茹, 吴瑕. 教师的语言形式对儿童语言理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 59-64.

ZHANG Huan, ZUO Tianran, JIANG Wei, PEI Lingru, WU Xia. The Influence of Teachers’ Descriptions in Dialogue on Children’s Language Comprehension[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 59-64.

参考文献

程亚华, 伍新春, 刘红云, 李虹. (2018). 小学低年级儿童口语词汇知识的发展轨迹及其影响因素. 心理学报, 50(2), 206–215
彭聃龄. (2019). 普通心理学 (第5版). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
舒华, 张亚旭. (2008). 心理学研究方法: 实验设计和数据分析. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
张文新, 林崇德. (1999). 儿童社会观点采择的发展及其与同伴互动关系的研究. 心理学报, 31(4), 418–427
赵鑫, 李红利, 金戈, 李世峰, 周爱保, 梁文佳, .. 蔡亚亚. (2020). 语音记忆和中央执行功能在不同年级儿童解码和语言理解中的作用. 心理学报, 52(4), 469–484
赵鑫, 周仁来. (2010). 工作记忆: 人类高级认知活动的核心. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 38–44
Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941.
Bevilacqua, D., Davidesco, I., Wan, L., Chaloner, K., Rowland, J., Ding, M. Z., .. Dikker, S. (2019). Brain-to-brain synchrony and learning outcomes vary by student-teacher dynamics: Evidence from a real-world classroom electroencephalography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(3), 401–411, doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01274.
Branigan, H. P., Catchpole, C. M., & Pickering, M. J. (2011). What makes dialogues easy to understand? Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1667–1686, doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.524765.
Cotton, S. M., Kiely, P. M., Crewther, D. P., Thomson, B., Laycock, R., & Crewther, S. G. (2005). A normative and reliability study for the Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 647–659, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.015.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability: Instructions. Educational Research Bulletin, 27(2), 37–54.
Dikker, S., Wan, L., Davidesco, I., Kaggen, L., Oostrik, M., McClintock, J., .. Poeppel, D. (2017). Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom. Current Biology, 27(9), 1375–1380, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.002.
MacDonald, K., Marchman, V. A., Fernald, A., & Frank, M. C. (2020). Children flexibly seek visual information to support signed and spoken language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(6), 1078–1096, doi: 10.1037/xge0000702.
Nozawa, T., Sakaki, K., Ikeda, S., Jeong, H., Yamazaki, S., Kawata, K. H. D., .. Kawashima, R. (2019). Prior physical synchrony enhances rapport and inter-brain synchronization during subsequent educational communication. Scientific Reports, 9, 12747, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49257-z.
Pan, Y. F., Dikker, S., Goldstein, P., Zhu, Y., Yang, C. R., & Hu, Y. (2020). Instructor-learner brain coupling discriminates between instructional approaches and predicts learning. NeuroImage, 211, 116657, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116657.
Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C. C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., .. Tao, S. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48–76, doi: 10.1037/bul0000124.
Peng, P., Lee, K. J., Luo, J., Li, S. T., Joshi, R. M., & Tao, S. (2021). Simple view of reading in Chinese: A one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 3–33, doi: 10.3102/0034654320964198.
Tree, J. E. F. (1999). Listening in on monologues and dialogues. Discourse Processes, 27(1), 35–53, doi: 10.1080/01638539909545049.
Tree, J. E. F., & Mayer, S. A. (2008). Overhearing single and multiple perspectives. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 160–179, doi: 10.1080/01638530701792867.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). The development of higher forms of attention in childhood. Soviet Psychology, 18(1), 67–115, doi: 10.2753/RPO1061-0405180167.
Zheng, L. F., Chen, C. S., Liu, W. D., Long, Y. H., Zhao, H., Bai, X. L., .. Lu, C. M. (2018). Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students’ knowledge state. Human Brain Mapping, 39(7), 3046–3057, doi: 10.1002/hbm.24059.

[1]	李祖儿, 侯金芹, 陈祉妍. 严厉管教的代际传递：父母的互倚及子女性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 93-99.
[2]	廖天嗣, 黄妍, 陈晓晨. 祖孙代际接触与青少年对老年人态度的关系：群际焦虑和共情的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 86-92.
[3]	张姝玥, 赵峰, 黄骏青, 彭春花, 王军利. 积极道德情绪对3～5岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 79-85.
[4]	郑柯君, 李妍, 陈欣银, 边玉芳. 青少年早期抑郁症状对父母温暖与社交淡漠关系的中介作用：一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 71-78.
[5]	武俐, 郭元祥. 父母自主支持与高中生学习投入：意向性自我调节和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 64-70.
[6]	赵新宇, 乔晓光, 邢晓沛. 父母自主支持、10～12岁儿童的同伴关系与执行功能的动态互动关系：一个发展级联模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 55-63.
[7]	曹贤才, 潘姝玮, 王大华, 白学军. 一般依恋、父母依恋与青少年抑郁和问题行为的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 46-54.
[8]	巩彦斌, 杨海波. 体育锻炼与大学生智能手机成瘾的关系：创新行为和心理健康的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 770-775.
[9]	占萍萍, 古静静, 王金良. 父母教养方式类型与青少年网络成瘾的关系：认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 776-783.
[10]	刘仁洁, 夏凌翔, 赵永萍. 大学生网络欺凌受害潜在类别的发展特点及性别因素的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 784-791.
[11]	张野, 刘致宏, 鞠萍, 杨硕, 于涛. 感知校园氛围与初中生网络欺凌行为的关系：越轨同伴交往的中介和亲子亲合的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 792-798.
[12]	吕沐华, 熊昱可, 杨柳, 陈嘉慧, 王泉泉, 任萍. 受欺负对青少年主动性攻击及反应性攻击的影响：愤怒反刍和悲伤反刍的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 799-806.
[13]	林丽云, 向梦涵, 吴泳桃, 刘学兰. 父母养育倦怠对亲子关系的影响：婚姻质量和共同教养的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 807-814.
[14]	王大涛, 刘艳艳, 周建华. 同伴侵害对青少年内外化问题的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 651-657.
[15]	蔡保贞, 方杰. 父母低头行为与青少年冷酷无情特质的关系及差异：一个链式中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 644-650.

教师的语言形式对儿童语言理解的影响

The Influence of Teachers’ Descriptions in Dialogue on Children’s Language Comprehension

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价