人格对幼儿白谎行为的影响：“冷”“热”执行功能的并行中介作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.02.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨人格对幼儿白谎行为的影响，及“冷”“热”执行功能的中介作用机制，采用问卷法和测验法对218名3～6岁幼儿的人格、言语能力、“冷”“热”执行功能和白谎行为进行测试。结果显示：控制年龄和言语能力后，智能特征和亲社会性可显著正向预测幼儿白谎行为；“冷”执行功能在智能特征和白谎行为间发挥部分中介作用；“热”执行功能在亲社会性和白谎行为间发挥部分中介作用；“热”执行功能在外倾性和白谎行为间发挥完全中介作用；“冷”“热”执行功能在认真自控和白谎行为间发挥完全中介作用。研究结果进一步揭示了人格对幼儿白谎行为影响的内在机制。

关键词: 幼儿, 人格, “冷”执行功能, “热”执行功能, 白谎行为

Abstract: This study aimed to explore how personality affects preschool children’s white lie behavior and the mediating effects of “cold” and “hot” executive function. The research mainly adopted questionnaire and test method, to test a total of 218 preschool children (age range 3~6 years, 103 boys and 115 girls) from three kindergartens in Tianjin in relation to personality, verbal ability, cold and hot executive function and white lie behavior. Results indicated that: 1) With age and verbal ability controlled, intellectual characteristics and pro-sociality significantly positively predicted white lie behavior directly. 2) “Cold” executive function played a partial mediating role between intellectual characteristics and white lie behavior. 3) “Hot” executive function played a partial mediating role between pro-sociality and white lie behavior. 4) The effect of extroversion on white lie behavior was totally mediated by “hot” executive function. 5) The effect of conscientiousness on white lie behavior was totally mediated by “cold” and “hot” executive function. The results further reveal the internal mechanism of the influence of personality on children’s white lie behavior problems.

Key words: preschool children, personality, “cold”executive function, “hot”executive function, white lie behavior

中图分类号:

B844

孙云瑞, 韩映虹, 吕勇, 刘芳. 人格对幼儿白谎行为的影响：“冷”“热”执行功能的并行中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 240-247.

SUN Yunrui, HAN Yinghong, LYU Yong, LIU Fang. The Influence of Personality on Children’s White Lie Behavior: The Parallel Mediating Effect of “Cold” and “Hot” Executive Functions[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(2): 240-247.

参考文献

陈昱翀, 何珍, 文萍. (2017). “热”执行对破坏性行为障碍4岁幼儿抑制控制与工作记忆的影响. 中国特殊教育, (4), 91–96
方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强. (2017). 类别变量的中介效应分析. 心理科学, 40(2), 471–477
李红, 高山, 王乃弋. (2004). 执行功能研究方法评述. 心理科学进展, 12(5), 693–705
林传鼎, 张厚粲. (1986). 韦氏儿童智力量表中国修订本. 北京: 北京师范学院.
陆露, 范敏霞, 郑晓露, 肖倩媛, 王静梅, 陈冠杏, 卢英俊. (2018). 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童冷、热执行功能及心理理论研究. 中国特殊教育, (7), 65–71, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2018.07.012
吕勇, 孙云瑞. (2022). 心理理论对幼儿白谎行为的影响: 认知移情的部分中介作用. 心理科学, 45(1), 75–81
杨丽珠, 张金荣, 刘红云, 孙岩. (2015). 3~6岁儿童人格发展的群组序列追踪研究. 心理科学, 38(3), 586–593
岳童, 黄希庭, 傅安国, 薛黎明. (2021). 特质积极共情: 一种高利他性的人格品质. 心理科学, 44(3), 754–760
张娜, 刘秀丽. (2014). 儿童白谎行为影响因素的研究现状分析. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), (2), 146–151
赵宇晗, 余林. (2014). 人格特质与认知能力的关系及其年龄差异. 心理科学进展, 22(12), 1924–1934
Bell, T., Hill, N., & Stavrinos, D. (2020). Personality determinants of subjective executive function in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 24(11), 1935–1944.
Berman, J. Z., & Silver, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and reputation: When does doing good lead to looking good. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 102–107, doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.021.
Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Pantheon.
Broomfield, K. A., Robinson, E. J., & Robinson, W. P. (2002). Children’s understanding about white lies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 47–65, doi: 10.1348/026151002166316.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2007). Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 227–246, doi: 10.1080/10705510709336745.
Dima, D., Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., & Frangou, S. (2015). Neuroticism and conscientiousness respectively constrain and facilitate short-term plasticity within the working memory neural network. Human Brain Mapping, 36(10), 4158–4163, doi: 10.1002/hbm.22906.
Erat, S., & Gneezy, U. (2012). White lies. Management Science, 58(4), 723–733, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1449.
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Burack, J. A. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: I. Theory of mind in typical and atypical development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(4), 116–121.
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10(4), 483–527.
Goldstein, S., & Naglieri, J. A. (2014). Handbook of executive functioning. New York: Springer.
Heyman, G. D., Ding, X. P., Fu, G. Y., Xu, F., Compton, B. J., & Lee, K. (2020). Young children selectively hide the truth about sensitive topics. Cognitive Science, 44(3), e12824.
Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 233–253, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00921.x.
Kline, R., Bankert, A., Levitan, L., & Kraft, P. (2019). Personality and prosocial behavior: A multilevel meta-analysis. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(1), 125–142, doi: 10.1017/psrm.2017.14.
Krieger, V., Amador-Campos, J. A., & Guàrdia-Olmos, J. (2020). Executive functions, personality traits and ADHD symptoms in adolescents: A mediation analysis. PLoS One, 15(5), e0232470, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232470.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
Nagar, P. M., Caivano, O., & Talwar, V. (2020). The role of empathy in children’s costly prosocial lie-telling behaviour. Infant and Child Development, 29(4), e2179.
Poland, S. E., Monks, C. P., & Tsermentseli, S. (2016). Cool and hot executive function as predictors of aggression in early childhood: Differentiating between the function and form of aggression. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 181–197.
Russell, J., Mauthner, N., Sharpe, S., & Tidswell, T. (1991). The ‘windows task’ as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 331–349.
Sai, L. Y., Shang, S. Y., Tay, C., Liu, X. C., Sheng, T. W., Fu, G. Y., .. Lee, K. (2021). Theory of mind, executive function, and lying in children: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 24(5), e13096.
Sarzyńska, J., Falkiewicz, M., Riegel, M., Babula, J., Margulies, D. S., Nęcka, E., .. Szatkowska, I. (2017). More intelligent extraverts are more likely to deceive. PLoS One, 12(4), e0176591, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176591.
Shao, R., & Lee, T. (2017). Are individuals with higher psychopathic traits better learners at lying? Behavioural and neural evidence. Translational Psychiatry, 7(7), e1175, doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.147.
Smillie, L. D., Lawn, E. C. R., Zhao, K., Perry, R., & Laham, S. M. (2019). Prosociality and morality through the lens of personality psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 50–58.
Talwar, V., Crossman, A., & Wyman, J. (2017). The role of executive functioning and theory of mind in children’s lies for another and for themselves. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 41, 126–135, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.07.003.
Umemoto, A., & Holroyd, C. B. (2016). Exploring individual differences in task switching: Persistence and other personality traits related to anterior cingulate cortex functions. Progress in Brain Research, 229, 189–212.
Williams, S., Moore, K., Crossman, A. M., & Talwar, V. (2016). The role of executive functions and theory of mind in children’s prosocial lie-telling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 256–266, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.001.
Zelazo, P. D. (2015). Executive function: Reflection, iterative reprocessing, complexity, and the developing brain. Developmental Review, 38, 55–68, doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.001.
Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2002). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 445–469). Oxford: Blackwell Press.

[1]	张鹏程, 李喜, 桑宇杰, 陈宁. 神经质人格对中小学生抑郁的影响：班级环境的跨层调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 637-643.
[2]	程刚, 邹燕, 余玮, 丁芳媛, 贾云丞. 入学过渡期高中新生大五人格与主观社会地位变化轨迹的关系：基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 692-699.
[3]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[4]	尹静, 李传英, 马世超, 徐瑜姣, 李永升. 大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.
[5]	李飞飞, 缴润凯, 刘丹, 尹航. 幼儿教师感恩特质与职业使命感的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 824-830.
[6]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[7]	黄明明, 陈丽萍, 郭莉萍, 赵守盈. 工作-家庭冲突与幼儿教师离职意向的关系：职业认同感与职业倦怠的序列中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 679-686.
[8]	龚扬, 姜露, 秦雯雯. 祖辈参与教养与幼儿社会能力的关系：母亲育儿压力和母亲教养效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 348-353.
[9]	彭丽仪, 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 詹林. 儿童期受虐经历对大学生抑郁的影响：神经质人格和MAOA基因rs3027407多态性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 230-236.
[10]	曹晓丽, 彭晨, 张王琼. 变革型领导对高校教师变革支持行为的影响：有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 273-279.
[11]	曾练平, 田丹丹, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. 中小学教师人格类型及其对工作家庭平衡与工作绩效关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 280-286.
[12]	李甜甜, 顾吉有, 徐鹤文. 父亲抑郁对幼儿问题行为的影响：教养效能感和教养方式的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 66-73.
[13]	颜玉枝, 董圣鸿. 中国人幸福人格的结构与内涵[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 755-761.
[14]	王嵩, 李甦. 幼儿复述能力的发展及其与言语工作记忆的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 596-602.
[15]	刘文, 孟祥蕊, 车翰博, 张嘉琪, 沈漪. 小学生创造性人格教师评定问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 624-630.