快慢读者利用语境信息的差异：加工深度的作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.04.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过主题扫描和阅读理解两种加工深度不同的任务，考察快慢读者预测性效应差异的来源及加工深度在其中发挥的作用。被试在两种任务情境下阅读分别包含高低预测性目标词的96个句子框架，记录其眼动轨迹。结果显示：预测性效应仅在阅读理解任务中出现，快速读者在早期眼动指标上就表现出了预测性效应，慢速读者在晚期眼动指标上才表现出预测性效应。结果表明：加工深度调节快慢读者预测性效应的大小；在自然阅读情境下快慢读者的预测性效应表现符合预测编码框架假设。

关键词: 阅读速度, 预测性效应, 主题扫描, 阅读理解

Abstract: This study examined the source of predictability effect differences between fast and slow readers and the role of processing depth in two tasks (i.e., topic scanning and reading comprehension) with different processing depths. Participants read 96 sentence frames embedded with high and low predictive target words in two task situations while their eye movements were recorded by an eye tracker. The results showed that the predictability effect only appeared in reading comprehension task, with fast readers showing predictive effect in the early stage while slow readers showing predictive effect in the later stage. The results suggest that processing depth moderates the predictability effect of fast and slow readers. In addition, during natural reading, the predictability effect of fast and slow readers conforms to the predictive coding framework hypothesis.

Key words: reading speed, word predictability effect, topic scanning, reading comprehension

中图分类号:

B842

仝文, 余雪, 刘志方, 朱星宇, 齐琦. 快慢读者利用语境信息的差异：加工深度的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 450-456.

TONG Wen, YU Xue, LIU Zhifang, ZHU Xingyu, QI Qi. Differences in Contextual Information Utilization Between Fast and Slow Readers: The Role of Processing Depth[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(4): 450-456.

参考文献

刘妮娜, 王霞, 刘志方, 王永胜, 闫国利. (2019). 语境预测性对中文高低阅读技能儿童预视加工的影响. 心理科学, 42(4), 848–853
刘志方, 仝文, 张智君, 赵亚军. (2020). 语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响: 眼动证据. 心理学报, 52(9), 1031–1047
王丽红, 白学军, 闫国利, 吴捷. (2012). 词频和语境预测性在老年人阅读中的作用: 眼动研究. 中国老年学杂志, 32(16), 3503–3507
王穗苹, 佟秀红, 杨锦绵, 冷英. (2009). 中文句子阅读中语义信息对眼动预视效应的影响. 心理学报, 41(3), 220–232
张丽华, 王晓彤, 隋雪. (2019). 校对阅读基本过程的眼动研究. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 42(4), 9–15
Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), 1065–1086, doi: 10.1080/02724980443000476.
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364–390, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1.
Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(3), 209–217, doi: 10.1037/h0087476.
Chang, M., Hao, L. S., Zhao, S. N., Li, L., Paterson, K. B., & Wang, J. X. (2020). Flexible parafoveal encoding of character order supports word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(6), 2793–2801.
Dampuré, J., Ros, C., Rouet, J. F., & Vibert, N. (2012). How word familiarity facilitates visual search for verbal material. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 271–288, doi: 10.1002/acp.1821.
DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language & Linguistics Compass, 8(12), 631–645.
Duggan, G. B., & Payne, S. J. (2009). Text skimming: The process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(3), 228–242, doi: 10.1037/a0016995.
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(6), 627–635, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8.
Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., Gagl, B., & Hutzler, F. (2015). On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study. Scientific Reports, 5, 8432, doi: 10.1038/srep08432.
Hersch, J., & Andrews, S. (2012). Lexical quality and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down contributions to sentence processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 240–262, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.564244.
Kim, Y. H., & Goetz, E. T. (1994). Context effects on word recognition and reading comprehension of poor and good readers: A test of the interactive-compensatory hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(2), 178–188, doi: 10.2307/747810.
Klein, H. A., Klein, G. A., & Bertino, M. (1974). Utilization of context for word identification decisions in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17(1), 79–86, doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(74)90007-1.
Perfetti, C. A., Goldman, S. R., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 273–282.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506, doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461.
Rayner, K., Li, X. S., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. L. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1089–1093.
Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E. J., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34, doi: 10.1177/1529100615623267.
Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N. (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 834–839.
Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504–509.
Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1300–1310, doi: 10.1177/0956797610378686.
Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 1–21.
Risse, S. (2014). Effects of visual span on reading speed and parafoveal processing in eye movements during sentence reading. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 11, doi: 10.1167/14.8.11.
Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition, 125(2), 179–194, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.004.
Schustack, M. W., Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1987). Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(3), 322–340, doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90117-3.
Schvaneveldt, R., Ackerman, B. P., & Semlear, T. (1977). The effect of semantic context on children’s word recognition. Child Development, 48(2), 612–616, doi: 10.2307/1128660.
Steiner, R., Wiener, M., & Cromer, W. (1971). Comprehension training and identification for poor and good readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(6), 506–513, doi: 10.1037/h0032035.
Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30(4), 415–433, doi: 10.1177/107769905303000401.
Wang, A. P., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Yan, M. (2014). Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: Evidence from reading Chinese as a second language. Acta Psychologica, 152, 29–33, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.010.
West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1978). Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages. Child Development, 49(3), 717–727, doi: 10.2307/1128240.
West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., Feeman, D. J., & Cunningham, A. E. (1983). The effect of sentence context on word recognition in second- and sixth-grade children. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(1), 6–15, doi: 10.2307/747333.
White, S. J., Warrington, K. L., McGowan, V. A., & Paterson, K. B. (2015). Eye movements during reading and topic scanning: Effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 233–248, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000020.

[1]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[2]	张笛, 赵微, 李莉, 高桂丽. 早期词意识测量及其对阅读的预测作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 771-778.
[3]	孔海燕, 孙雨, 宋广文. 心智游移、工作记忆对初中生阅读理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 362-370,377.
[4]	吴国来, 周曼, 阴晓娟, 李海英, 李娇花. 走神对中文阅读绩效的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 329-334.
[5]	屈晓兰,陈向阳,钟毅平. 文本阅读理解中精加工推理及错误记忆探讨[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(4): 307-311.
[6]	刘新颜,关善玲,冯本才,范晓红,郭洁. 语文学困生与学优生阅读理解监控的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4(3): 225-229.
[7]	李宁宁,李洪玉. 背景音乐对中学生阅读理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4(2): 149-153.
[8]	鲁忠义,陈伟娜. 语篇阅读中高级目标推理的机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(1): 5-10.
[9]	宋广文,刘兆敏. 阅读理解水平对文章信息保持迁移影响的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(4): 610-613.
[10]	王穗苹,杨锦绵. 精细阐述与先行信息激活水平的动态变化[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(2): 425-429.
[11]	李伟健. 学习困难学生阅读理解监视的实验研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(1): 346-350.