父亲婚姻满意度对1～3岁婴幼儿社会−情绪能力的影响：父子依恋和父亲参与的链式中介作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.06.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨父亲婚姻满意度对婴幼儿社会−情绪能力的影响及其作用机制，采用父亲婚姻质量满意度量表、婴幼儿社会−情绪能力量表、父子依恋量表和父亲参与量表，对212名1～3岁婴幼儿父母进行调查。结果发现：（1）父亲婚姻满意度正向预测婴幼儿社会−情绪能力。（2）父亲参与在父亲婚姻满意度和婴幼儿社会−情绪能力之间起中介作用。（3）父子依恋、父亲参与在父亲婚姻满意度和婴幼儿社会−情绪能力之间起链式中介作用。

关键词: 父亲婚姻满意度, 父子依恋, 父亲参与, 社会?情绪能力, 婴幼儿

Abstract:

To explore the effects of paternal marital satisfaction on children’s social-emotional competence and its mechanism, 212 children aged 1~3 years old and their parents participated in this study. Fathers completed Marital Satisfaction Scale, Infant Attachment Scale, and Father Involvement Scale while mothers completed Infant Attachment Scale and Infant-Toddler Social & Emotional Assessment Scale. The results showed that: 1) Paternal marital satisfaction could significantly predict children’s social-emotional competence. 2) Father involvement mediated the relationship between paternal marital satisfaction and children’s social-emotional competence. 3) Father-child attachment and father involvement played significant chain mediating roles between paternal marital satisfaction and children’s social-emotional competence.

Key words: paternal marital satisfaction, father-child attachment, father involvement, social-emotional competence, infants and toddlers

中图分类号:

B844

何慧华, 陈迎新, 蒋琴, 姜露. 父亲婚姻满意度对1～3岁婴幼儿社会−情绪能力的影响：父子依恋和父亲参与的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 790-796.

Huihua HE, Yingxin CHEN, Qin JIANG, Lu JIANG. Effects of Paternal Marital Satisfaction on 1~3 Years Old Children’s Social-Emotional Competence: A Chain Mediating Model of Father-Child Attachment and Father Involvement[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 790-796.

图/表 5

参考文献

	洪佩佩. (2008). 2-4岁幼儿依恋问卷的编制和依恋安全性的测量(硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.
	李凌江, 杨德森. (1999). Olson婚姻质量问卷(ENRICH). 见汪向东, 王希林, 马弘 (编), 心理卫生评定量表手册 (增订版, pp. 153–159). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社.
	李晓巍, 魏晓宇父亲参与的现状及其与幼儿社会能力的关系——母亲教养效能的中介作用. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, (5): 49- 58.
	李原. (2011). 父亲参与教养与幼儿创造力的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 首都师范大学, 北京.
	梁宗保, 马林阁, 张光珍, 邓慧华父母婚姻关系质量与学前儿童社会适应: 父母养育行为的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24 (3): 499- 503.
	沈欣, 赵敏芳, 王晓平, 尚俊辰疫情下幼儿父母婚姻质量对亲子关系的影响: 有调节的中介模型. 心理学进展, 2022, 12 (1): 11- 25.
	宋雅婷, 李晓巍城市家庭祖辈−父辈共同养育0~6岁儿童的现状研究. 少年儿童研究, 2020, (2): 61- 73.
	王红艳, 王冰儿童依恋的研究及其新进展. 幼儿教育(教育科学版), 2006, (4): 46- 49.
	邢淑芬, 梁熙, 岳建宏, 王争艳祖辈共同养育背景下多重依恋关系及对幼儿社会−情绪性发展的影响. 心理学报, 2016, 48 (5): 518- 528.
	邢学玮, 伍新春, 侯建芳, 刘畅, 陈玲玲父亲的角色态度对其教养投入的影响: 母亲态度类型的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30 (4): 387- 395.
	杨青青, 李晓巍. (2018). 父亲婚姻满意度与幼儿社会适应: 父亲反应方式的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(1), 129–132, 138.
	尹霞云. (2012). 儿童与父亲的关系: 影响因素及儿童的心理适应(博士学位论文). 中南大学, 长沙.
	张建端. (2008). 《12~36月龄幼儿情绪社会性评估量表》修订研究(博士学位论文). 华中科技大学, 武汉.
	张印平, 刘亚鹏, 朱颖, 张光珍, 梁宗保, 陆祖宏, 邓慧华亲子依恋与父母养育方式之间的关系. 应用心理学, 2015, 21 (1): 32- 38.
	周浩, 龙立荣共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (6): 942- 950.
	周柳伶, 李信, 刘彤, 陈毅文婚姻满意度对儿童心理适应性的影响: 成人依恋、父母情绪表达、亲子依恋的多重中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15 (5): 714- 720.
	Abuhammad, S., Khraisat, O., Joseph, R., & Al Khawaldeh, A. Factors that predict infant temperament: A Jordanian study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 2020, 51, e45- e49. DOI
	Barbu, S., Cabanes, G., & Le Maner-Idrissi, G. Boys and girls on the playground: Sex differences in social development are not stable across early childhood. PLoS One, 2011, 6 (1): e16407.
	Bernier, A., Jarry-Boileau, V., & Lacharité, C. Marital satisfaction and quality of father-child interactions: The moderating role of child gender. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2014, 175 (2): 105- 117.
	Boldt, L. J., Kochanska, G., Yoon, J. E., & Nordling, J. K. Children’s attachment to both parents from toddler age to middle childhood: Links to adaptive and maladaptive outcomes. Attachment & Human Development, 2014, 16 (3): 211- 229.
	Bowlby, J. Attachment theory and its therapeutic implications. Adolescent Psychiatry, 1978, 6, 5- 33.
	Brown, G. L., & Cox, M. J. Pleasure in parenting and father-child attachment security. Attachment & Human Development, 2020, 22 (1): 51- 65.
	Brown, G. L., Mangelsdorf, S. C., Shigeto, A., & Wong, M. S. Associations between father involvement and father-child attachment security: Variations based on timing and type of involvement. Journal of Family Psychology, 2018, 32 (8): 1015- 1024. DOI
	Cano, T., Perales, F., & Baxter, J. A matter of time: Father involvement and child cognitive outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2019, 81 (1): 164- 184. DOI
	Carter, A. S., Briggs-Gowan, M. J., Jones, S. M., & Little, T. D. The infant-toddler social and emotional assessment (ITSEA): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2003, 31 (5): 495- 514. DOI
	Christopher, C., Umemura, T., Mann, T., Jacobvitz, D., & Hazen, N. Marital quality over the transition to parenthood as a predictor of coparenting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2015, 24 (12): 3636- 3651.
	Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 1997, 48, 243- 267. DOI
	Erel, O., & Burman, B. Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 118 (1): 108- 132. DOI
	Fearon, R. M. P., & Belsky, J. Attachment and attention: Protection in relation to gender and cumulative social-contextual adversity. Child Development, 2004, 75 (6): 1677- 1693.
	Fernandes, C., Monteiro, L., Santos, A. J., Fernandes, M., Antunes, M., Vaughn, B. E., & Veríssimo, M. Early father-child and mother-child attachment relationships: Contributions to preschoolers’ social competence. Attachment & Human Development, 2020, 22 (6): 687- 704.
	Hawkins, A. J., Bradford, K. P., Palkovitz, R., Christiansen, S. L., Day, R. D., & Call, V. R. A. The inventory of father involvement: A pilot study of a new measure of father involvement. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 2002, 10 (2): 183- 196. DOI
	Kwok, S. Y. C. L., Ling, C. C. Y., Leung, C. L. K., & Li, J. C. M. Fathering self-efficacy, marital satisfaction and father involvement in Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2013, 22 (8): 1051- 1060.
	Lindsey, E. W., Caldera, Y. M., & Tankersley, L. Marital conflict and the quality of young children’s peer play behavior: The mediating and moderating role of parent-child emotional reciprocity and attachment security. Journal of Family Psychology, 2009, 23 (2): 130- 145.
	Lui, M., Lau, G. K., Tam, V. C., Chiu, H. M., Li, S. S., & Sin, K. F. Parents’ impact on children’s school performance: Marital satisfaction, parental involvement, and mental health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2020, 29 (6): 1548- 1560. DOI
	McCoy, K., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. Constructive and destructive marital conflict, emotional security and children’s prosocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2009, 50 (3): 270- 279.
	McCoy, K. P., George, M. R. W., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. Constructive and destructive marital conflict, parenting, and children’s school and social adjustment. Social Development, 2013, 22 (4): 641- 662.
	Mo, X. L., Wang. Z., & Shao, J. J. Parent-child attachment and good behavior habits among Chinese children: Chain mediation effect of parental involvement and psychological Suzhi. PLoS One, 2021, 16 (1): e0241586. DOI
	Qian, Y. M., Chen, F. M., & Yuan, C. Y. The effect of co-parenting on children’s emotion regulation under fathers’ perception: A moderated mediation model of family functioning and marital satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020, 119, 105501.
	Rueger, S. Y., Katz, R. L., Risser, H. J., & Lovejoy, M. C. Relations between parental affect and parenting behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2011, 11 (1): 1- 33.
	Veríssimo, M., Santos, A. J., Vaughn, B. E., Torres, N., Monteiro, L., & Santos, O. Quality of attachment to father and mother and number of reciprocal friends. Early Child Development and Care, 2011, 181 (1): 27- 38. DOI
	Wang, Y. H., Yang, Z. X., Zhang, Y. B., Wang, F. M., Liu, T., & Xin, T. The effect of social-emotional competency on child development in western China. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10, 1282.
	Zhang, J., Liu, Y. Y., & Hu, T. Q. A meta-analysis of the relationship between father involvement and problem behaviour among preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 2021, 191 (11): 1802- 1824. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1.父亲婚姻满意度	37.44	6.63
2.父亲参与	114.01	31.20	0.63**
3.父子依恋	149.91	21.17	0.37**	0.55**
4.社会−情绪能力	47.98	10.49	0.33**	0.42**	0.21**
5.母子依恋	138.47	20.60	0.31**	0.55**	0.58**	0.14*
6.婴幼儿月龄	27.81	5.52	−0.17*	−0.08	−0.06	0.01	−0.08
7.婴幼儿性别	1.46	0.50	−0.05	0.00	−0.02	0.01	−0.01	0.01

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1.父亲婚姻满意度	37.44	6.63
2.父亲参与	114.01	31.20	0.63**
3.父子依恋	149.91	21.17	0.37**	0.55**
4.社会−情绪能力	47.98	10.49	0.33**	0.42**	0.21**
5.母子依恋	138.47	20.60	0.31**	0.55**	0.58**	0.14*
6.婴幼儿月龄	27.81	5.52	−0.17*	−0.08	−0.06	0.01	−0.08
7.婴幼儿性别	1.46	0.50	−0.05	0.00	−0.02	0.01	−0.01	0.01

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F	β	t
社会−情绪能力	父亲婚姻满意度	0.33	0.11	12.85***	0.31	4.56***
	母子依恋				0.05	0.69
父子依恋	父亲婚姻满意度	0.61	0.37	62.60***	0.21	3.68***
	母子依恋				0.51	8.91***
父亲参与	父亲婚姻满意度	0.75	0.57	90.76***	0.46	9.37***
	父子依恋				0.22	3.78***
	母子依恋				0.28	4.96***
社会−情绪能力	父亲婚姻满意度	0.44	0.19	12.50***	0.09	1.16
	父子依恋				0.02	0.27
	父亲参与				0.42	4.45***
	母子依恋				−0.13	−1.58

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F	β	t
社会−情绪能力	父亲婚姻满意度	0.33	0.11	12.85***	0.31	4.56***
	母子依恋				0.05	0.69
父子依恋	父亲婚姻满意度	0.61	0.37	62.60***	0.21	3.68***
	母子依恋				0.51	8.91***
父亲参与	父亲婚姻满意度	0.75	0.57	90.76***	0.46	9.37***
	父子依恋				0.22	3.78***
	母子依恋				0.28	4.96***
社会−情绪能力	父亲婚姻满意度	0.44	0.19	12.50***	0.09	1.16
	父子依恋				0.02	0.27
	父亲参与				0.42	4.45***
	母子依恋				−0.13	−1.58

中介路径	效应量	BootSE	Boot CI	相对中介效应（%）
总间接效应	0.221	0.06	[0.11, 0.35]	70.57
父亲婚姻满意度→父子依恋→社会−情绪能力	0.005	0.02	[−0.04, 0.04]	1.60
父亲婚姻满意度→父亲参与→社会−情绪能力	0.196	0.05	[0.10, 0.30]	62.58
父亲婚姻满意度→父子依恋→父亲参与→社会−情绪能力	0.020	0.01	[0.01, 0.04]	6.39