问题性社交媒介使用与主观幸福感的关系：技术冲突和疲惫感的链式中介作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨问题性社交媒介使用与主观幸福感的关系及其内在作用机制，以1073名大学生为被试，采用问卷法对其问题性社交媒介使用、技术冲突、疲惫感及主观幸福感进行调查。结果发现：(1)问题性社交媒介使用、技术冲突、疲惫感两两之间均呈显著正相关，三者与主观幸福感均呈显著负相关；(2)问题性社交媒介使用能够显著负向预测主观幸福感；(3)技术冲突和疲惫感分别在问题性社交媒介使用与主观幸福感的关系中起单独中介作用，并且问题性社交媒介使用还能通过技术冲突−疲惫感的链式中介作用影响大学生的主观幸福感。研究结果有助于揭示问题性社交媒介使用影响大学生主观幸福感的内在机制，对引导大学生合理使用社交媒介、对其进行心理社会适应服务具有一定的启示意义。

关键词: 问题性社交媒介使用, 技术冲突, 疲惫感, 主观幸福感

Abstract: We recruited 1073 college students from four universities, using Social Network Sites Addiction Scale, Technology Conflict Scale, Fatigue Scale, the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale and Life Satisfaction Scale, to investigate the effect of social network sites addiction on subjective well-being and its underlying mechanism among college students. Results showed that: 1) There were significant positive correlations between any two of the three variables, that is, problematic social media use, technology conflict, fatigue, each of which was negatively correlated with subjective well-being. 2) Problematic social media use significantly negatively predicted subjective well-being. 3) Problematic social media use affected subjective well-being through three paths: the first was the mediating role of technology conflict; the second was the mediating role of fatigue; the third was the chain-mediated role of both technology conflict and fatigue. This study uncovered the mechanism underlying the relationship between problematic social media use and subjective well-being, which not only contributes to the understanding of the complex mechanism between problematic social media use and its outcomes, but also has enlightening significance for us to guide college students use social network sites appropriately and moderately and to promote their psychosocial adaptation.

Key words: problematic social media use, technology conflict, fatigue, subjective well-being

中图分类号:

B849

闫景蕾, 傅苗苗, 黄贝, 连帅磊. 问题性社交媒介使用与主观幸福感的关系：技术冲突和疲惫感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 824-831.

Jinglei YAN, Miaomiao FU, Bei HUANG, Shuailei LIAN. Problematic Social Media Use and Subjective Well-Being: The Chain Mediating Role of Technology Conflict and Fatigue[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 824-831.

图/表 5

参考文献

	陈春宇, 连帅磊, 孙晓军, 柴唤友, 周宗奎. 社交网站成瘾与青少年抑郁的关系: 认知负载和核心自我评价的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34 (2): 210- 218.
	陈春宇, 连帅磊, 杨晨, 周宗奎. 手机成瘾与大学生抑郁的关系: 疲惫感和反刍思维的作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27 (4): 746- 749,745.
	方杰, 张敏强, 邱皓政. 中介效应的检验方法和效果量测量: 回顾与展望. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28 (1): 105- 111.
	黄婷婷, 刘莉倩, 王大华, 张文海. 经济地位和计量地位: 社会地位比较对主观幸福感的影响及其年龄差异. 心理学报, 2016, 48 (9): 1163- 1174.
	孔繁昌, 冯雅萌, 赵改, 刘诏君, 王亚丹, 周宗奎. (2019). 移动社交媒介使用对大学生生活满意度的影响: 线上和线下社会资本的作用. 心理与行为研究, 17(5), 699–705.
	连帅磊, 冯全升, 闫景蕾, 张艳红. 手机成瘾、非理性拖延与抑郁、焦虑的关系: 正念的保护性作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (1): 51- 55,18.
	邱林, 郑雪, 王雁飞. 积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)的修订. 应用心理学, 2008, 14 (3): 249- 254,268.
	王焕贞, 江琦, 侯璐璐. 大学生性格优势对主观幸福感的影响: 优势运用和压力性生活事件的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33 (1): 95- 104.
	詹鋆, 任俊. (2012). 自我控制与自我控制资源. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1457–1466.
	周宗奎, 连帅磊, 田媛, 牛更枫, 孙晓军. 社交网站使用与青少年生活满意度的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33 (3): 297- 305.
	Andreassen, C. S.. Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2015, 2 (2): 175- 184. DOI
	Baker, D. A., & Algorta, G. P. (2016). The relationship between online social networking and depression: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(11), 638–648.
	Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., Senol-Durak, E., Durak, M., & Sherstyuk, L.. The role of personality traits in Facebook and Internet addictions: A study on Polish, Turkish, and Ukrainian samples. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 68, 269- 275. DOI
	Bright, L. F., Kleiser, S. B., & Grau, S. L.. Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 44, 148- 155. DOI
	Cramer, E. M., Song, H., & Drent, A. M.. Social comparison on Facebook: Motivation, affective consequences, self-esteem, and Facebook fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 64, 739- 746. DOI
	Diener, E.. Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. The American Psychologist, 2000, 55 (1): 34- 43. DOI
	Dredge, R., & Schreurs, L. (2020). Social media use and offline interpersonal outcomes during youth: A systematic literature review. Mass Communication and Society, 23(6), 885–911.
	Faelens, L., Hoorelbeke, K., Fried, E., De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W.. Negative influences of Facebook use through the lens of network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, 96, 13- 22. DOI
	Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
	Ho, T. T. Q.. Facebook addiction and depression: Loneliness as a moderator and poor sleep quality as a mediator. Telematics and Informatics, 2021, 61, 101617. DOI
	Hobfoll, S. E.. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 2002, 6 (4): 307- 324. DOI
	Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Face to (face)book: The two faces of social behavior? Journal of Personality, 81(3), 290–301.
	Koc, M., & Gulyagci, S. (2013). Facebook addiction among Turkish college students: The role of psychological health, demographic, and usage characteristics. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(4), 279–284.
	Li, C. N., Shi, X. X., & Dang, J. N.. Online communication and subjective well-being in Chinese college students: The mediating role of shyness and social self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 34, 89- 95. DOI
	Lian, S. L., Sun, X. J., Yang, X. J., & Zhou, Z. K.. The effect of adolescents’ active social networking site use on life satisfaction: The sequential mediating roles of positive feedback and relational certainty. Current Psychology, 2020, 39 (1): 2087- 2095.
	Marino, C., Gini, G., Vieno, A., & Spada, M. M.. The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2018, 226, 274- 281. DOI
	Marttila, E., Koivula, A., & Räsänen, P. (2021). Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 59, 101556.
	Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & van Heck, G. L.. Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2003, 54 (4): 345- 352. DOI
	Ryan, T., Chester, A., Reece, J., & Xenos, S.. The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2014, 3 (3): 133- 148. DOI
	Saleem, T., & Hawamdeh, E. S.. Counselor self-efficacy, spiritual well-being and compassion satisfaction/fatigue among mental health professionals in Pakistan. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 (16): 13785- 13797. DOI
	Tromholt, M. (2016). The Facebook experiment: Quitting Facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(11), 661–666.
	Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., Shablack, H., Orvell, A., Bayer, J., ... Kross, E.. Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 2015, 144 (2): 480- 488.
	Wolniczak, I., Cáceres-Delaguila, J. A., Palma-Ardiles, G., Arroyo, K. J., Solís-Visscher, R., Paredes-Yauri, S., ... Bernabe-Ortiz, A.. Association between Facebook dependence and poor sleep quality: A study in a sample of undergraduate students in Peru. PLoS One, 2013, 8 (3): e59087. DOI
	Young, N. L., Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Howard, C. J.. Passive Facebook use, Facebook addiction, and associations with escapism: An experimental vignette study. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 71, 24- 31. DOI
	Yu, T. R., & Zhang, G. (2023). College students’ social media addiction and sleep problems: Chain mediating effects of fear of missing out and nocturnal social media use. Social Behavior and Personality, 51(6), 1–9.
	Zheng, X. B., & Lee, M. K. O.. Excessive use of mobile social networking sites: Negative consequences on individuals. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 65, 65- 76. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1.问题性社交媒介使用	2.68	0.76
2.技术冲突	3.49	1.31	0.68***
3.疲惫感	2.50	0.58	0.42***	0.46***
4.积极情绪	3.10	0.68	−0.10**	−0.22***	−0.25***
5.消极情绪	2.18	0.80	0.29***	0.31***	0.34***	0.02
6.生活满意度	3.60	1.01	−0.13***	−0.17***	−0.23***	0.25***	−0.07*
7.主观幸福感	0.00	0.63	−0.27***	−0.37***	−0.43***	0.65***	−0.55***	0.70***

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1.问题性社交媒介使用	2.68	0.76
2.技术冲突	3.49	1.31	0.68***
3.疲惫感	2.50	0.58	0.42***	0.46***
4.积极情绪	3.10	0.68	−0.10**	−0.22***	−0.25***
5.消极情绪	2.18	0.80	0.29***	0.31***	0.34***	0.02
6.生活满意度	3.60	1.01	−0.13***	−0.17***	−0.23***	0.25***	−0.07*
7.主观幸福感	0.00	0.63	−0.27***	−0.37***	−0.43***	0.65***	−0.55***	0.70***

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F(df)	β	t
主观幸福感		0.27	0.08	21.17***(4)
	性别				0.06	1.05
	年龄				−0.02	−0.50
	年级				0.02	0.43
	问题性社交媒介使用				−0.28	−9.20***
技术冲突		0.68	0.46	239.48***(4)
	性别				0.14	3.08*
	年龄				−0.02	−0.53
	年级				0.04	0.99
	问题性社交媒介使用				0.67	29.38***
疲惫感		0.52	0.27	67.94***(5)
	性别				−0.36	−6.37***
	年龄				−0.05	−1.60
	年级				0.13	2.69**
	问题性社交媒介使用				0.21	5.52***
	技术冲突				0.34	9.39***
主观幸福感		0.47	0.22	41.57***(6)
	性别				−0.01	−0.15
	年龄				−0.04	−1.16
	年级				0.08	1.63
	问题性社交媒介使用				0.03	0.73
	技术冲突				−0.24	−6.08***
	疲惫感				−0.34	−10.48***

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F(df)	β	t
主观幸福感		0.27	0.08	21.17***(4)
	性别				0.06	1.05
	年龄				−0.02	−0.50
	年级				0.02	0.43
	问题性社交媒介使用				−0.28	−9.20***
技术冲突		0.68	0.46	239.48***(4)
	性别				0.14	3.08*
	年龄				−0.02	−0.53
	年级				0.04	0.99
	问题性社交媒介使用				0.67	29.38***
疲惫感		0.52	0.27	67.94***(5)
	性别				−0.36	−6.37***
	年龄				−0.05	−1.60
	年级				0.13	2.69**
	问题性社交媒介使用				0.21	5.52***
	技术冲突				0.34	9.39***
主观幸福感		0.47	0.22	41.57***(6)
	性别				−0.01	−0.15
	年龄				−0.04	−1.16
	年级				0.08	1.63
	问题性社交媒介使用				0.03	0.73
	技术冲突				−0.24	−6.08***
	疲惫感				−0.34	−10.48***

	效应值	Boot标准误	Boot CI下限	Boot CI 上限	相对中介效应(%)
总间接效应	−0.30	0.03	−0.36	−0.25
间接效应1	−0.16	0.03	−0.21	−0.11	56.89
间接效应2	−0.08	0.01	−0.10	−0.06	27.25
间接效应3	−0.07	0.02	−0.10	−0.05	25.83
间接效应1和间接效应2之差	−0.08	0.03	−0.14	−0.02
间接效应1和间接效应3之差	−0.09	0.03	−0.15	−0.03
间接效应2和间接效应3之差	−0.00	0.02	−0.04	0.03