不同自我同一性状态大学生的回音适应行为表现

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.03.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 信息窄化(回音室效应)现象日益突出并带来消极影响，但人们会采取回音适应行为以应对或消除信息窄化的影响。大学生正处于角色转变的关键时期，回音适应行为表现可能与其自我同一性发展水平有关。研究基于身份资本假设与I³行为主义框架探究并解释这一问题。使用问卷法对366名大学生进行施测，结果发现：处于自我同一性完成状态的大学生，回音适应行为得分最高，转变状态下次之，弥散状态下最低；信息过载和感知效用解释了弥散状态大学生的回音适应行为；身份气泡强化和感知效用解释了转变状态下大学生的回音适应行为。结果表明，弥散状态个体采取回音适应行为可能与无效而过载的信息推荐有关；转变状态个体采取回音适应行为可能与信息推荐为建立“身份气泡”机制提供了有效信息有关。

关键词: 自我同一性, 回音适应行为, 信息过载, 身份气泡强化, 感知效用

Abstract: Although the phenomenon of information narrowing (echo chamber effect) is becoming increasingly prominent and has negative consequences, people would engage in echo-adaptation to cope with or mitigate the effects of information narrowing. College students are at a critical period of role transition, and their engagement in echo-adaptation may be related to the level of development of their self-identity. This study explored this issue based on the assumptions of identity capital and the I³ behavioral framework. A questionnaire survey of 366 college students was conducted. The results showed that, the score of echo-adaptive behavior was highest for college students in the ego-identity completion state, then for the transformation, and was lowest for the diffuse state. The overload information and perceived utility explained the echo-adaptive behavior of college students in the diffuse state, while the identity bubble reinforcement and perceived utility explained the echo-adaptive behavior of college students in the transformation state. The results indicate that echo-adaptive behavior for individuals in a diffuse state may be associated with ineffective and overload information recommendation, while for individuals in a transitional state, it may be related to the effective information provided by information recommendation technologies that establishs an “identity bubble” mechanism for individuals.

Key words: ego-identity, echo-adaptive behavior, information overload, identity bubble reinforcement, perceived utility

中图分类号:

B844

杨权, 牛更枫, 孙晓军. 不同自我同一性状态大学生的回音适应行为表现[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 338-345.

YANG Quan, NIU Gengfeng, SUN Xiaojun. Echo-Adaptive Behavior of College Students with Different Self-Identity States[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 338-345.

参考文献

侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
黄华华, 刘少英, 徐芬. (2014). 大学生的自我同一性与社会适应. 中国心理卫生杂志, 28(1), 70–74.
牛更枫, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 田媛, 刘庆奇, 连帅磊. (2016). 青少年社交网站使用对自我概念清晰性的影响: 社会比较的中介作用. 心理科学, 39(1), 97–102.
曲苒, 倪晓莉. (2020). 网络社交媒体使用对青少年生活满意度的影响: 自我同一性状态的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 214–219.
王辰, 陈刚, 刘跃宁, 牛更枫, 殷华敏. (2020). 社会排斥对网络偏差行为的影响: 自我控制的中介作用和道德同一性的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(2), 208–215.
王珊. (2022). 批判性思维对“回音室效应”的影响研究(硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
王树青, 陈会昌. (2013). 大学生自我同一性状态问卷中文简版的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(2), 196–199.
杨晓辉, 王腊梅, 朱莉琪. (2014). 儿童发展与电子媒体: 基于生态科技微系统理论的视角. 心理科学, 37(4), 920–924.
张洁婷, 张敏强, 黎光明. (2017). 潜在剖面模型的后续分析——比较分类分析法改进后的偏差. 心理学探新, 37(5), 434–440.
张璐, 乌云特娜, 金童林. (2021). I³模型视角下个体行为的表达机制. 心理科学进展, 29(10), 1878–1886.
张馨月, 邓林园. (2015). 青少年感知的父母冲突、自我同一性对其网络成瘾的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(5), 906–910.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942–950.
Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368.
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611–626.
Bennion, L. D., & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the extended version of the objective measure of ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1(2), 183–197.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117.
Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21(1), 39–66.
Bourne, E. (1978). The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisal: Part II. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7(4), 371–392.
Branje, S., de Moor, E. L., Spitzer, J., & Becht, A. I. (2021). Dynamics of identity development in adolescence: A decade in review. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 908–927.
Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 538–549.
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(9), e2023301118.
Côté, J. E., & Levine, C. (1987). A formulation of Erikson’s theory of ego identity formation. Developmental Review, 7(4), 273–325.
Crocetti, E. (2017). Identity formation in adolescence: The dynamic of forming and consolidating identity commitments. Child Development Perspectives, 11(2), 145–150.
Czerwiński, S. K., & Atroszko, P. A. (2023). A solution for factorial validity testing of three-item scales: An example of tau-equivalent strict measurement invariance of three-item loneliness scale. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1652–1664.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton & Co.
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416.
Holdack, E., Lurie-Stoyanov, K., & Fromme, H. F. (2022). The role of perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness in assessing the acceptance of AR wearables. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102259.
Hong, H., & Kim, H. J. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of information overload in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9305.
Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Savolainen, I., & Oksanen, A. (2020). Shared identity and shared information in social media: Development and validation of the Identity Bubble Reinforcement Scale. Media Psychology, 23(1), 25–51.
Kim, K., Lustria, M. L. A., Burke, D., & Kwon, N. (2007). Predictors of cancer information overload: Findings from a national survey. Information Research, 12(4), 326.
Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Li, J., Zhang, S. Q., & Ao, W. T. (2023). Why is instant messaging not instant? Understanding users’ negative use behavior of instant messaging software. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 107655.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558.
Masrom, M. B., Busalim, A. H., Abuhassna, H., & Mahmood, N. H. N. (2021). Understanding students’ behavior in online social networks: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 6.
Oksanen, A., Oksa, R., Savela, N., Kaakinen, M., & Ellonen, N. (2020). Cyberbullying victimization at work: Social media identity bubble approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106363.
Rodríguez, S., Piñeiro, I., Regueiro, B., & Estévez, I. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and perceived utility as predictors of student homework engagement. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 25(2), 93–99.
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469–508.
Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsai, W. H. S., Tao, W. T., Chuan, C. H., & Hong, C. (2020). Echo chambers and social mediators in public advocacy issue networks. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101882.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.
Wang, Y. (2016). Information adoption model, a review of the literature. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(11), 618–622.
Wolpe, J. (1950). Need-reduction, drive-reduction, and reinforcement: A neurophysiological view. Psychological Review, 57(1), 19–26.
Wong, R. Y. M., Cheung, C. M. K., & Xiao, B. (2018). Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 247–257.
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838.

[1]	曲苒, 倪晓莉. 网络社交媒体使用对青少年生活满意度的影响：自我同一性状态的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 214-219.
[2]	王树青, 曹晖, 苏霞. 亲子依恋、分离-个体化对大学生自我同一性状态的影响：自我不一致的中介作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 343-350.
[3]	吴国来，钟琼瑶，陈韩清. 父亲忽视与青少年自我同一性的关系:情绪调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 333-338.
[4]	王树青；宋尚桂. 大学生自我同一性与亲子依恋、因果取向之间的关系[J]. , 2012, 10(1): 32-37.
[5]	. 大学生自我同一性发展与存在焦虑的关系研究[J]. , 2010, 8(3): 235-240.
[6]	王树青,张文新,陈会昌. 中学生自我同一性的发展与父母教养方式、亲子沟通的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4(2): 126-132.