背景线索效应的动态眼动模式：基于隐马尔可夫模型

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.003

心理与行为研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 594-601.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.003

背景线索效应的动态眼动模式：基于隐马尔可夫模型

赵光^1,2,3, 陈佳欢^1,2, 李林璇^1,2, 张吉超^1,2, 吴镕涛^1,2

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 天津市学生心理健康与智能评估重点实验室，天津 300387

收稿日期:2023-10-23 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-09-20
通讯作者: 赵光，E-mail：zhaoguang721@163.com
基金资助:
天津市哲学社会科学规划研究项目(TJJX22-004)。

The Dynamic Eye Movement Patterns in Contextual Cueing Effect: Evidence from the Hidden Markov Model

ZHAO Guang^1,2,3, CHEN Jiahuan^1,2, LI Linxuan^1,2, ZHANG Jichao^1,2, WU Rongtao^1,2

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Student Mental Health and Intelligence Assessment, Tianjin 300387

Received:2023-10-23 Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用背景线索效应范式，通过隐马尔可夫模型以数据驱动的方法考察重复场景和新异场景在眼动模式上的差异。结果发现，重复场景与新异场景的眼动模式存在显著差异，主要体现在重复场景中被试有更高的概率从注视点直接转移到目标上。此外通过变分贝叶斯期望最大化对被试的眼动序列进行聚类发现，被试存在全局搜索与定向搜索两种眼动模式，且这种眼动模式不受重复场景和新异场景的影响。

关键词: 背景线索效应, 内隐记忆, 隐马尔可夫模型, 眼动模式

Abstract: In this study, the contextual cueing effect paradigm was used and a data-driven approach with hidden Markov model (HMM) was employed to investigate differences in eye movement patterns between different scenes and individuals. The results showed significant differences in eye movement patterns between repeated and novel scenes, primarily characterized by a higher likelihood of direct saccades to the target in repeated scenes. Furthermore, the analyses of variational Bayesian expectation maximization (VBEM) for clustering fixation sequences showed that participants exhibited two distinct eye movement patterns, that is, global search mode and directed search mode, regardless of whether the scene was repeated or novel.

Key words: contextual cueing effect, implicit memory, hidden Markov model, eye movement patterns

中图分类号:

B842

赵光, 陈佳欢, 李林璇, 张吉超, 吴镕涛. 背景线索效应的动态眼动模式：基于隐马尔可夫模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 594-601.

ZHAO Guang, CHEN Jiahuan, LI Linxuan, ZHANG Jichao, WU Rongtao. The Dynamic Eye Movement Patterns in Contextual Cueing Effect: Evidence from the Hidden Markov Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 594-601.

参考文献

金君敏. (2017). 认知风格对变化觉察任务下背景线索效应的影响. 内江师范学院学报, 32(4), 12–18.
李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. (2022). 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响. 心理与行为研究, 20(4), 433–440.
魏玲, 白学军, 连坤予. (2017). 背景线索和认知风格对真实场景中目标搜索影响的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 37(5), 401–408.
Bergmann, N., & Schubö, A. (2021). Local and global context repetitions in contextual cueing. Journal of Vision, 21(10), 9.
Brooks, D. I., Rasmussen, I. P., & Hollingworth, A. (2010). The nesting of search contexts within natural scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1406–1418.
Chan, F. H. F., Barry, T. J., Chan, A. B., & Hsiao, J. H. (2020). Understanding visual attention to face emotions in social anxiety using hidden Markov models. Cognition and Emotion, 34(8), 1704–1710.
Cho, V. Y., Hsiao, J. H., Chan, A. B., Ngo, H. C., King, N. M., & Anthonappa, R. P. (2022). Eye movement analysis of children’s attention for midline diastema. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 7462.
Chuk, T., Chan, A. B., & Hsiao, J. H. (2014). Understanding eye movements in face recognition using hidden Markov models. Journal of Vision, 14(11), 8.
Chuk, T., Crookes, K., Hayward, W. G., Chan, A. B., & Hsiao, J. H. (2017). Hidden Markov model analysis reveals the advantage of analytic eye movement patterns in face recognition across cultures. Cognition, 169, 102–117.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 224–234.
Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (2000). On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1–3), 65–81.
Edwards, K. S., & Shin, M. (2017). Media multitasking and implicit learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(5), 1535–1549.
Harris, A. M., & Remington, R. W. (2017). Contextual cueing improves attentional guidance, even when guidance is supposedly optimal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(5), 926–940.
Hsiao, J. H., Lan, H., Zheng, Y. Y., & Chan, A. B. (2021). Eye movement analysis with hidden Markov models (EMHMM) with co-clustering. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2473–2486.
Kim, K. S. (2001). Information-seeking on the web: Effects of user and task variables. Library & Information Science Research, 23(3), 233–255.
Kojouharova, P., Nagy, B., Czigler, I., & Gaál, Z. A. (2023). Mechanisms of spatial contextual cueing in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 60(11), e14361.
Kucharský, Š., Visser, I., Truțescu, G. O., Laurence, P. G., Zaharieva, M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2020). Cognitive strategies revealed by clustering eye movement transitions. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(1), 1.
Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S. J., & Wolfe, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing by global features. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(7), 1204–1216.
Pereira, E. J., & Castelhano, M. S. (2019). Attentional capture is contingent on scene region: Using surface guidance framework to explore attentional mechanisms during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1273–1281.
Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(7), 1239–1249.
Preuschhof, C., Sharifian, F., Rosenblum, L., Pohl, T. M., & Pollmann, S. (2019). Contextual cueing in older adults: Slow initial learning but flexible use of distractor configurations. Visual Cognition, 27(5–8), 563–575.
Schankin, A., & Schubö, A. (2010). Contextual cueing effects despite spatially cued target locations. Psychophysiology, 47(4), 717–727.
Seitz, W., Zinchenko, A., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2023). Contextual cueing of visual search reflects the acquisition of an optimal, one-for-all oculomotor scanning strategy. Communications Psychology, 1(1), 20.
Seitz, W., Zinchenko, A., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2024). Distraction from long-term memory in visual search: Acquired procedural and template-based memory interfere with contextual cueing after target re-location. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13506285.2024.2315786
Sisk, C. A., Remington, R. W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2019). Mechanisms of contextual cueing: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(8), 2571–2589.
Wang, C., Haponenko, H., Liu, X. Z., Sun, H. J., & Zhao, G. (2019). How attentional guidance and response selection boost contextual learning: Evidence from eye movement. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 265–275.
Wolfe, J. M., Võ, M. L. H., Evans, K. K., & Greene, M. R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 77–84.
Xie, X. W., Chen, S. Y., & Zang, X. L. (2020). Contextual cueing effect under rapid presentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 603520.
Yang, Y. C., Coutinho, M. V. C., Greene, A. J., & Hannula, D. E. (2021). Contextual cueing is not flexible. Consciousness and Cognition, 93, 103164.
Young, M. E., Clark, M. H., Goffus, A., & Hoane, M. R. (2009). Mixed effects modeling of morris water maze data: Advantages and cautionary notes. Learning and Motivation, 40(2), 160–177.
Zang, X. L., Jia, L. N., Müller, H. J., & Shi, Z. H. (2015). Invariant spatial context is learned but not retrieved in gaze-contingent tunnel-view search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 807–819.
Zhao, G., Liu, Q., Jiao, J., Zhou, P. L., Li, H., & Sun, H. J. (2012). Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: Evidence from eye movement recordings. Journal of Vision, 12(6), 11.
Zinchenko, A., Geyer, T., & Föcker, J. (2022). The acquisition but not adaptation of contextual memories is enhanced in action video-game players. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107401.

[1]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[2]	高超, 李士一, 章鹏, 赵光. 基于双眼视差探讨深度知觉信息对背景线索效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 16-21,29.
[3]	李士一, 周日, 孙璐, 谢岩枫, 赵光. 三维场景中内隐记忆的空间更新[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 736-742.
[4]	李士一, 白学军, 王雨薇, 郑蕾, 孙弘进. 二维场景旋转下的背景提示效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 289-294.
[5]	张玥, 刘越月, 石加男. 积极情绪强度对广告外显和内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 541-546.
[6]	王黎静,杨丽娴. 负性情绪词语在外显和内隐记忆测验中的定向遗忘效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 13-17.
[7]	张滨熠，丁锦红. 多目标视觉追踪中物体属性加工的眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 304-309.
[8]	陶云霍俊丽高松叶存春. 心境一致性对大学生外显和内隐记忆影响的实验研究[J]. , 2007, 5(3): 171-176.
[9]	吉峰,梁宝勇. 内隐记忆中的神经机制研究方法[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(1): 57-60.
[10]	尹文刚,舒华,蒋志峰,吴迪. 珠心算过程的眼动和认知研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(3): 513-518.
[11]	杨治良,周颖,李林. 无意识认知的探索[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(3): 161-165.
[12]	吕勇, 韩宗义, 杜英春. 启动效应的ERP研究综述[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(2): 151-155.

背景线索效应的动态眼动模式：基于隐马尔可夫模型

The Dynamic Eye Movement Patterns in Contextual Cueing Effect: Evidence from the Hidden Markov Model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价