凸显刺激在面孔情绪统计概要表征中的作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.06.005

心理与行为研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 752-760.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.06.005

凸显刺激在面孔情绪统计概要表征中的作用

赵冰洁¹, 张琪涵*^,²()

1. 商丘师范学院教师教育学院，商丘 476000
2. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津师范大学心理学部，天津市学生心理健康与智能评估重点实验室，天津 300387

收稿日期:2024-07-08 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-11-20
通讯作者: 张琪涵
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32100878)。

The Role of Salient Stimuli in the Statistical Summary Representations of Facial Emotion

Bingjie ZHAO¹, Qihan ZHANG*^,²()

1. School of Teacher Education, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu 476000
2. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Student Mental Health and Intelligence Assessment, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387

Received:2024-07-08 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-20
Contact: Qihan ZHANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了探究放大假说在高级视觉中的适用性，本研究使用多特征刺激，详细探讨了凸显刺激在面孔情绪统计概要表征中的作用，并考察个体差异的调节效应。实验1考察了凸显刺激是否影响统计概要表征，实验2增加凸显刺激的数量后，操纵凸显刺激的分布以探讨其影响不同效价统计概要表征的具体方式。结果表明，凸显刺激的存在会导致偏差增加，表现出干扰效应；当凸显刺激较少时，仅在积极情绪条件下存在干扰效应；当凸显刺激较多时，两种情绪下均存在干扰效应，干扰效应随着集合数量的增多而增多。此外，分析思维对干扰程度的调节效应存在个体差异，在高愤怒敌意个体中起负向调节作用；在低愤怒敌意个体中起正向调节作用。研究揭示了统计概要表征中的选择性加权机制，即凸显刺激对面孔情绪统计概要表征的影响受刺激属性和个体差异的多重调节。

关键词: 统计概要表征, 面孔情绪, 凸显刺激, 个体差异

Abstract:

This study examined the amplification hypothesis in high-level visual processing by examining how salient stimuli modulate statistical summary representations (SSRs) of facial emotions and interact with individual factors. Experiment 1 tested salient stimuli’s impact on SSRs, while Experiment 2 varied their set-size and distribution across emotional valences. The results showed that salient stimuli increased bias, disrupting SSRs. Such interference occurred only with positive emotions. However, with more salient stimuli, the interference occurred for both emotional conditions which increased with their number increased. Furthermore, individual differences exist in the moderating effect of analytical thinking on interference. This study highlights a selective weighting mechanism in SSRs, where the effect of salient stimuli on SSRs is shaped by both stimulus properties and individual differences.

Key words: statistical summary representations, facial emotion, salient stimuli, individual differences

赵冰洁, 张琪涵. 凸显刺激在面孔情绪统计概要表征中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(6): 752-760.

Bingjie ZHAO, Qihan ZHANG. The Role of Salient Stimuli in the Statistical Summary Representations of Facial Emotion[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(6): 752-760.

图/表 7

图1 面孔材料示例

图2 实验1材料示例

图3 实验流程

图4 实验1积极情绪(左)与消极情绪(右)下各实验条件偏差的结果

图5 实验2材料示例

图6 实验2积极情绪(左)与消极情绪(右)下各实验条件偏差的结果

图7 分析思维在愤怒敌意与干扰程度之间的调节作用

参考文献 0

	戴晓阳, 姚树桥, 蔡太生, 杨坚. NEO个性问卷修订本在中国的应用研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2004, 18 (3): 171- 174, 170. DOI
	仝可, 唐薇, 陈文锋, 傅小兰. 统计概要表征的内容与机制. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23 (10): 1723- 1731.
	许茜如, 何蔚祺, 叶超雄, 罗文波. 情绪面孔注意偏向的加工机制: 愤怒和快乐优势效应. 生理学报, 2019, 71 (1): 86- 94.
	赵冰洁, 何婕, 刘颖, 杨邵峰, 王峥, 张琪涵, 白学军. 凸显刺激对整体知觉集合数量效应的影响. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22 (2): 212- 219.
	Alaybek, B., Wang, Y., Dalal, R. S., Dubrow, S., & Boemerman, L. S. G. The relations of reflective and intuitive thinking styles with task performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 2022, 75 (2): 295- 319.
	Allik, J., Toom, M., Raidvee, A., Averin, K., & Kreegipuu, K. An almost general theory of mean size perception. Vision Research, 2013, 83, 25- 39. DOI
	Anderson, A. K., & Phelps, E. A. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature, 2001, 411 (6835): 305- 309. DOI
	Attarha, M., & Moore, C. M. (2015). The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1116–1131.
	Capozzi, F., Bayliss, A. P., & Ristic, J. Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 (6): 2260- 2266.
	Chaisilprungraung, T., Kaewbuapan, P., Intrachooto, S., Pongsuwan, S., & Itthipuripat, S. The impact of emotional valence on the spatial scope of visual selective attention. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14 (1): 30231. DOI
	Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 2003, 43 (4): 393- 404. DOI
	Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1992, 1 (3): 98- 101. DOI
	Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2013, 8 (3): 223- 241.
	Faghel-Soubeyrand, S., Ramon, M., Bamps, E., Zoia, M., Woodhams, J., Richoz, A. R., ... Charest, I. Decoding face recognition abilities in the human brain. PNAS Nexus, 2024, 3 (3): 1- 12.
	Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41 (4): 1149- 1160. DOI
	Frederick, S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005, 19 (4): 25- 42. DOI
	Goldenberg, A., LaFollette, K., Huang, Z., Weisz, E., & Cikara, M. (2022). Judgment of crowds as emotional increases with the proportion of black faces. PsyArXiv. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ys65p
	Goldenberg, A., Schöne, J., Huang, Z., Sweeny, T. D., Ong, D. C., Brady, T. F., ... Gross, J. J. Amplification in the evaluation of multiple emotional expressions over time. Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6 (10): 1408- 1416. DOI
	Horry, R., Cheong, W., & Brewer, N. The other-race effect in perception and recognition: Insights from the complete composite task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2015, 41 (2): 508- 524. DOI
	Iakovlev, A. U., & Utochkin, I. S. (2021). Roles of saliency and set size in ensemble averaging. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(3), 1251–1262.
	Kahneman, D. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 2003, 93 (5): 1449- 1475. DOI
	Kanaya, S., Hayashi, M. J., & Whitney, D. Exaggerated groups: Amplification in ensemble coding of temporal and spatial features. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2018, 285 (1879): 20172770. DOI
	Kosonogov, V., & Titova, A. Recognition of all basic emotions varies in accuracy and reaction time: A new verbal method of measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 2019, 54 (5): 582- 588. DOI
	Lee, K. R., Dague, T. D., Sobel, K. V., Paternoster, N. J., & Puri, A. M. (2021). Set size and ensemble perception of numerical value. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(3), 1169–1178.
	Neumann, M. F., Ng, R., Rhodes, G., & Palermo, R. Ensemble coding of face identity is not independent of the coding of individual identity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2018, 71 (6): 1357- 1366. DOI
	Norris, C. J. The negativity bias, revisited: Evidence from neuroscience measures and an individual differences approach. Social Neuroscience, 2021, 16 (1): 68- 82. DOI
	Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition. Behavior Research Methods, 2016, 48 (1): 341- 348. DOI
	Ristic, J., & Capozzi, F. Mechanisms for individual, group-based and crowd-based attention to social information. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2022, 1 (12): 721- 732. DOI
	Russell, J. A., & Bullock, M. Multidimensional scaling of emotional facial expressions: Similarity from preschoolers to adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 48 (5): 1290- 1298. DOI
	Soroka, S., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116 (38): 18888- 18892.
	Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., ... Nelson, C. The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 2009, 168 (3): 242- 249. DOI
	Vikhanova, A., Mareschal, I., & Tibber, M. (2022). Emotion recognition bis depends on stimulus morphing strategy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(6), 2051–2059.
	Wang, S. Face size biases emotion judgment through eye movement. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8 (1): 317. DOI
	Willenbockel, V., Sadr, J., Fiset, D., Horne, G. O., Gosselin, F., & Tanaka, J. W. Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, 2010, 42 (3): 671- 684. DOI
	Yang, J., McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr., P. T., Dai, X., Yao, S., Cai, T., & Gao, B. Cross-cultural personality assessment in psychiatric populations: The NEO-PI-R in the People’s Republic of China. Psychological Assessment, 1999, 11 (3): 359- 368. DOI

[1]	陈相文, 王泷歌, 胡惠兰, 张志超, 王梦思, 汪强, 张慢慢. 中文阅读词频效应个体差异的脑结构基础：基于眼动指标的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(6): 721-729.
[2]	赵冰洁, 何婕, 刘颖, 杨邵峰, 王峥, 张琪涵, 白学军. 凸显刺激对整体知觉集合数量效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 212-219.
[3]	张芳文, 马骁, 马谐. 语言差异对跨通道情绪启动效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 452-459.
[4]	黄仁辉，曾晓青，李文虎. 不确定性容忍度对模糊决策中决策偏好的影响及其情景依赖性^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 377-383.

凸显刺激在面孔情绪统计概要表征中的作用

The Role of Salient Stimuli in the Statistical Summary Representations of Facial Emotion

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 0

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价