Gating范式：探讨听觉词汇加工的途径

心理与行为研究 ›› 2003, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2): 105-109.

Gating范式：探讨听觉词汇加工的途径

武宁宁, 舒华

北京师范大学心理学院,北京 100875

收稿日期:2003-02-09 出版日期:2003-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:作者简介：武宁宁,女,北京师范大学心理学院博士。舒华,女,北京师范大学心理学院教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家自然科学基金60033020和60083005项目资助

GATING PARADIGM: AN APPROACH FOR INVESTIGATION OF SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION

Wu Ningning, Shu Hua

School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received:2003-02-09 Online:2003-06-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 传统的反应时任务只能为听觉词汇加工提供定量数据,而不能提供定性信息,Gating范式的优势在于可以提供以上两种信息,使研究者能够全面、细致地了解听觉词汇加工的即时过程。而且它的适用群体广泛,可被用于研究不同年龄段的发展。文章较详细地介绍了Gating范式的基本特点及其在汉语研究中的应用,期待它被更多的研究者所认识和使用。

关键词: Gating范式, 听觉词汇加工, 汉语研究

Abstract: In studies of spoken word recognition, traditional reaction time （RT） tasks only give us quantitative information rather than qualitative information. The advantage of gating paradigm over RT tasks is that it provides both kinds of above information, which benefits researchers on observing an overall on-line process of spoken word recognition in detail. Furthermore, gating is also used in developmental studies and it is fit for special groups, such as children with reading problem, adults with aphasia, etc. This paper introduced the essential facets of gating paradigm and its limited application in Chinese studies, in order to make it more realized and used by Chinese psychologists.

Key words: gating paradigm, spoken word recognition, Chinese study

中图分类号:

B842

武宁宁, 舒华. Gating范式：探讨听觉词汇加工的途径[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(2): 105-109.

Wu Ningning, Shu Hua. GATING PARADIGM: AN APPROACH FOR INVESTIGATION OF SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2003, 1(2): 105-109.

参考文献

[1] Marslen-Wilson W, Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 1978, 10: 29~63
[2] McClelland J L, Elman J L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 1986, 18: 1~86
[3] Tyler L K, Wessels J. Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data. Perception and Psychophysics, 1985, 38（3）: 217~222
[4] Grosjean F. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 1980, 28（4）: 267~283
[5] Cotton S, Grosjean F. The gating paradigm: A comparison of successive and individual presentation formats. Perception and Psychophysics, 1984, 35（1）: 41~48
[6] Salasoo A, Pisoni D. Interaction of knowledge sources in spoken word identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 1985, 24: 210~231
[7] Walley A C, Michela V L, Wood D R. The gating paradigm: Effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Perception and Psychophysics, 1995, 57（3）: 343~351
[8] Grosjean F. Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1996, 11（6）: 597~604
[9] 武宁宁, 舒华, 刘燕妮. 汉语听觉词汇加工：来自Gating实验的证据. 第九届全国心理学学术会议, 广州: 2001
[10] Li P. The temporal structure of spoken sentence comprehension in Chinese. Perception and Psychophysics, 1996, 58: 571~586
[11] Li P, Yip M C. Context effects and the processing of spoken homophones. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1998,10: 223~243
[12] Li P. Spoken word recognition of code-switched words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 1996, 35: 757~774
[13] Li P, Shu H, Yip M, et al. Lexical ambiguity in sentence processing: Evidence from Chinese. In: M Nakayama eds. Crosslinguistic Sentence Processing. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, in press.
[14] 武宁宁, 舒华. 句子语境中汉语词类歧义词的意义激活. 心理学报, 2002, 34（5）: 454~461

[1]	章玉祉, 高异, 张积家. 义符启动范式下义符语义和语法激活的位置效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 721-727.
[2]	张政华, 张航, 王兵, 郑子龙, 赵黎明, 李卫君. 不同任务下声调和韵母在诗句中的加工过程——来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 728-735.
[3]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[4]	陈怡馨, 张琪涵, 夏依旦, 赵冰洁, 白学军. 同步性联合运动中对他人的运动预测：反馈线索的关键作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 743-749.
[5]	任亚萍, 孙岩, 赵雪松. 不同任务框架下自我损耗对自我-他人风险决策的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 750-756.
[6]	朱欢, 谢肖蔚, 戴喆如, 唐小雅, 臧健, 吴娇, 臧学莲. 基于汉字搜索的情景线索效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 577-584.
[7]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[8]	刘志方, 曾台燊, 柴林, 陈朝阳, 仝文. 失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工特点：消失文本证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 592-598.
[9]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[10]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[11]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[12]	李昀松, 陈启杨, 吴岩, 李天虹, 段如君. 形旁在形声字识别中的优势作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.
[13]	杨伟平, 杨项富, 徐建萍. 跨通道视听觉情绪信息对婴儿图式效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 447-453.
[14]	刘鹏飞, 崔佳歆, 任维聪, 张志杰. 4～7岁儿童时间概念的获得方式[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 454-459.
[15]	宋宜琪, 杨婉晴, 梁丹丹. 6～8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童空间概念“大”的隐喻映射研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 460-465.