学习策略在思维风格与数学学业成就关系中的中介效应研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 117-123.

学习策略在思维风格与数学学业成就关系中的中介效应研究

张龙梅¹,李洪玉^1,2,徐良森¹,胡中华²

1 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074;
2 天津师范大学教育学院,天津 300073

收稿日期:2008-05-09 出版日期:2008-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
通讯作者: 李洪玉,男,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院教授,博士。Email: henrylitj@gmail.com。
作者简介:张龙梅,女,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院硕士研究生。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学重大研究02JAZJDXLX004项目、全国教育科学规划重点DBA010168项目和天津市教育科学规划项目CE013项目的资助

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF LEARNING STRATEGY BETWEEN THINKING STYLE AND MATH ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Zhang Longmei¹,Li Hongyu^1,2,Xu Liangsen¹,Hu Zhonghua²

1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
2 Educational School of Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300073

Received:2008-05-09 Online:2008-06-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以227名大学二年级理科生为被试,采用问卷调查法,探讨了学习策略在思维风格与数学学业成就关系中的作用。结果表明：（1）认知策略、元认知策略在等级制风格与数学学业成就关系中起完全中介的作用,而资源管理策略在等级制风格与数学学业成就间的中介效应不显著。（2）认知策略、元认知策略在整体性风格与数学学业成就关系中起部分中介的作用,而资源管理策略在整体性风格与数学学业成就间的中介效应不显著。（3）认知策略、元认知策略和资源管理策略在开放性风格与数学学业成就关系中起部分中介的作用。（4）元认知策略在等级制风格与数学学业成就间的中介作用以及在开放性风格与数学学业成就间的中介作用都是相对较大的。

关键词: 思维风格, 学习策略, 大学二年级学生, 数学学业成就, 中介效应

Abstract: In order to explore the role of learning strategy between thinking style and math academic achievement, We administrated thinking style scale and learning strategy scale to 227 sophomore. The results suggest that:(1)Cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies together fully mediate the relationship between hierarchic style and math academic achievement, but resource management strategies don′t significantly mediate the relationship between hierarchic style and math academic achievement.(2)Cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies partially mediate the relationship between global style and math academic achievement, but resource management strategies don′t significantly mediate the relationship between global style and math academic achievement.(3)Cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies and resource management strategies partially mediate the relationship between liberal style and math academic achievement.(4)The mediating role of metacognitive strategies between hierarchic style and math academic achievement, between liberal style and math academic achievement is significant.

Key words: thinking style, learning strategy, sophomore, math academic achievement, mediating effect

中图分类号:

B447

张龙梅,李洪玉,徐良森,胡中华. 学习策略在思维风格与数学学业成就关系中的中介效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(2): 117-123.

Zhang Longmei,Li Hongyu,Xu Liangsen,Hu Zhonghua. THE MEDIATING ROLE OF LEARNING STRATEGY BETWEEN THINKING STYLE AND MATH ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2008, 6(2): 117-123.

参考文献

[1] 罗斐, 吴国宏. 斯腾伯格思维风格理论述评. 心理科学, 2004, 27(3): 718~720
[2] Dai D Y, Fddhusen J F. A validation study of the Thinking styles inventory: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 1999, 21(4): 302~313
[3] Zhang L F. Thinking Styles: their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 2002, 22(3): 331~348
[4] Zhang L F, Sternberg R J. The Nature Of Intellectual Styles. London: Mahwah, New Jersey, 2006
[5] Zhang L F. Do Thinking styles contribute to academic achievement beyond self-rated abilities. The Journal of Psychology, 2001, 135(6): 621~637
[6] 林丰勋, 孟庆茂. 中学生的思维风格与学业成绩. 教育研究与实验, 2003, 3, 44~48
[7] 李洪玉, 何一粟. 学习能力发展心理学. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2004
[8] 谷生华, 辛涛, 李荟. 初中生学习归因、学习策略与学习成绩关系的研究. 心理发展与教育, 1998, 14(2): 21~25
[9] Zhang L F, Sternberg R J. Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. The Journal of Psychology, 2000, 134(5): 469~489
[10] 刘电芝, 黄希庭. 学习策略研究概述. 教育研究, 2002, 23(2): 78~82
[11] 姜德红. 中学生思维风格发展特点的研究. 硕士学位论文, 天津师范大学, 2000
[12] Duncan T G, McKeachie W J. The making of the motiva′ted strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 2005, 40(2): 117~128
[13] 林丰勋, 孟庆茂. 中学生的思维风格与人格特质的关系. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 19(4): 27~32
[14] 吴明隆. spss统计应用实务: 问卷分析与应用统计. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003
[15] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614~620
[16] Zhang L F, Sternberg R J. Thinking styles and teachers characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 2002, 37(1): 3~12