跨期选择和风险决策的认知神经机制

心理与行为研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 76-80.

• 论文 • 上一篇

跨期选择和风险决策的认知神经机制

吴燕^{1, 3}, 周晓林², 罗跃嘉³

1 成都医学院四川应用心理学研究中心,成都 610083;
2 北京大学脑科学与认知科学中心,北京 100871;
3 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京 100875

收稿日期:2008-03-27 出版日期:2010-03-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
作者简介:吴燕,女,成都医学院四川应用心理学研究中心教师。Email: wuyanzhicheng@163.com。罗跃嘉,男,北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家自然科学基金30670698项目的资助

THE NEUROSCIENCE OF INTERTEMPORAL CHOICES AND DECISION-MAKING UNDER RISK AND UNCERTAINTY

Wu Yan^1,3,Zhou Xiaolin²,Luo Yuejia³

1 Applied Psychological Research Center of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610083;
2 Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
3 State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received:2008-03-27 Online:2010-03-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 经济决策包含两个传统问题：跨期选择和风险决策。跨期选择分为冲动决策和自我控制,当冲动决策时,优先激活了与中脑多巴胺神经元相联系的旁边缘区域,包括伏隔核、眶额皮层中部和前额叶中部;自我控制即选择延迟决策时大脑双侧前额叶和后顶叶皮层神经活动增强。在风险和不确定性条件下,大脑皮层和杏仁核与风险决策联系密切。

关键词: 经济神经科学, 认知, 情绪, 跨期选择, 风险决策

Abstract: Economic decision-making consists of two traditional problems: Intertemporal choices and Decision-making under risk and uncertainty. Intertemporal choice is divided into impulsivity and self-control. Paralimbic cortex, are preferentially activated by decisions involving impulsivity, including nucleus accumbens, orbitofrontal cortex in the central and middle prefrontal cortex; and regions of the lateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex show enhanced changes in activity by self-controlled decisions. Cerebral cortex and amygdala are associated with the deciong-making under risk and uncertainty.

Key words: neuroneconomics, emotion, cognition, intertemporal choices, decision-making under risk and uncertainty

中图分类号:

B845

吴燕, 周晓林, 罗跃嘉. 跨期选择和风险决策的认知神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 76-80.

Wu Yan,Zhou Xiaolin,Luo Yuejia. THE NEUROSCIENCE OF INTERTEMPORAL CHOICES AND DECISION-MAKING UNDER RISK AND UNCERTAINTY[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(1): 76-80.

参考文献

1 Von Neumann J, Morgonstern O. Thoery of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, 1947
2 Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Drazen P. Neuroecomonics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 2005, 43: 9-64
3 Kenning P, Plassmann H. Neuroecomonics: An overview from an economic perspective. Brain Research Bulletin, 2005, 67: 343-354
4 Melers B A, Schwartz R I. Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1999, 128: 332-345
5 Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory: an alternative of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 1982, 92: 805-824
6 Loomes G, Sugden R. Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies. 1986, 53: 271-282
7 Loewenstein G, Weber E, Hsee C, et al. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, 127(2): 267-286
8 Bechara A, Antonio R, Damasio H. The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 2005, 52: 336-372
9 Zajonc R B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inference. American Psychologist, 1980, 35: 151-175
10 Zajonc R. Emotions. The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York Oxford University Press, 1998. 591-632
11 Loewenstein G. The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice over time. New York Russell Sage Foundation, 1992. 75-89
12Kalenscher T, Ohmann T, Onur Güntürkün. The neuroscience of impulsive and self-controlled decisions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2006, 62(2): 203-211
13Baumeister, Roy F, Kathleen D V. Willpower, choice, and self-control.// Loewenstein, Read D, Baumeister R F. Time and decision: economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. New York Russell Sage, 2003
14Loewenstein G, Baba S. The dark side of emotions in decision making: When a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex can lead to more optimal decisions. Iowa City, University of Iowa, 2002
15McClure S M, Laibson D L, Lowenstein G, et al. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 2004, 306: 503-507
16Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, et al. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 1997, 275: 1293-1295
17Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H. Characterization of the decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesion. Brain, 2000, 123: 2189-2202
18Peters, Ellen, Paul S. The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 2000, 26(12): 1465-1475
19Bechara A, Damasio H. The role of amygdala in decision making// Shinnick P, Gallagher A, Pitkanen A, Shekhar, Cahill L. The amgydala in brain function: Basic and Clinical Approaches, New York, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 2003, 985: 356-369
20Bechara A, Antoine R, Damasio H, et al. Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 1999, 5473-5481
21Manes F, Barbara A, Sahakian. Decision-making process following damage to the prefrontal cortex. Brain, 2002, 125: 624-639
22Erk S, Spitzer M, Wunderlich A P, et al. Cultural objects modulate reward circuitry, Neuroreport, 2002, 13: 2499-2503
23Sabrina T, Craig R F, Christopher T, et al. The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making under Risk, Science, 2007, 315: 515-518

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	马丽云, 莫文. 自我损耗下积极情绪对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 684-691.
[3]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[4]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[5]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[6]	李永占. 情绪智力在身体自尊与进食障碍倾向间的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 570-576.
[7]	冯杰, 徐娟, 李亚兰, 伍新春. 先天视觉经验缺失对颜色认知的影响：一项ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 289-296.
[8]	于腾旭, 刘文, 刘方. 心理虐待与儿童快感缺失的关系：认知重评的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 361-367.
[9]	刘芳, 霍瑞, 韩铖铖, 王美沂, 杨海波. 执行功能对个体情绪调节策略使用倾向和调节效果的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 382-389.
[10]	郭丰波, 黄佳珊, 刘腾飞, 谷莉. 社会责任感调节群际替代性排斥中旁观者第三方惩罚[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 397-403.
[11]	李鹏, 张志超, 杨洋, 杨佳奇, 李洪玉. 工作压力对中小学教师职业倦怠的影响：情绪劳动和工作满意度的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 412-418.
[12]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[13]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[14]	韩瑞康, 林静远, 梅颖, 李开云, 林丰勋, 雷怡, 李红. 不确定感与从众：决断性与结构需求的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 174-181.
[15]	朱娜平, 王文平, 李丽琼, 刘雁伶. 数量让位价值：5～10岁儿童公平分配发展的“此消彼长”[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 233-239.

跨期选择和风险决策的认知神经机制

THE NEUROSCIENCE OF INTERTEMPORAL CHOICES AND DECISION-MAKING UNDER RISK AND UNCERTAINTY

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价