情绪的脑单侧化研究进展

心理与行为研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4): 312-318.

• 论文 • 上一篇

情绪的脑单侧化研究进展

姜媛^1,2,林崇德¹

1 北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京 100875;
2 北京体育大学运动心理学教研室,北京 100084

收稿日期:2010-10-25 出版日期:2010-12-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
通讯作者: 林崇德,男,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授,博士生导师。Email: linchongde@263.net。
作者简介:姜媛,女,北京师范大学发展心理研究所博士后,北京体育大学运动心理学教研室副教授。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金（新教师基金课题）项目（200800431004）和北京市哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目（sz200810028010）的资助

THE REVIEW OF LATERALIZATION OF EMOTION

Jiang Yuan^1,2,Lin Chongde¹

1 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
2 Division of Sport Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084

Received:2010-10-25 Online:2010-12-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过对情绪的脑单侧化研究及相关理论模型的回顾和梳理,阐明右脑模型、效价模型、趋近—回避模型以及行为唤起/抑制系统模型等情绪加工理论的内在联系及各自优势与局限。最后,对情绪的脑单侧化研究的未来予以了展望。

关键词: 情绪, 脑, 单侧化

Abstract: This study provides a review of research on the hemispheric specialization in emotional processing in the last years and the theoretical models. The Right Hemisphere, Valence, Approach-Withdrawal, and Behavioral Inhibition System-Behavioral Activation System models, and the relative merits and limitations of these models are discussed. Finally, the study suggests for future research on lateralization of emotions.

Key words: brain, lateralization, emotion

中图分类号:

B842.6

姜媛,林崇德. 情绪的脑单侧化研究进展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(4): 312-318.

Jiang Yuan,Lin Chongde. THE REVIEW OF LATERALIZATION OF EMOTION[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(4): 312-318.

参考文献

[1] Bourne V J. How are emotions lateralised in the brain? Contrasting existing hypotheses using the Chimeric Faces Test. Cogintion and emotion, 2010, 24(5): 903-911
[2] Borkenau P, Mauer M. Processing of pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral words in a lateralised emotional Stroop task. Cognition and Emotion, 2006, 20(6): 866-877
[3] Tamagni C, Mantei T, Brugger P. Emotion and space:Lateralized emotional word detection depends on line bisection bias. Neuroscience,2009, 162: 1101-1105
[4] Narumoto J, Okada T, Sadato N, et al. Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. Cognitive Brain Research, 2001, 12: 225-241
[5] Sato W, Kochiyama T, Yoshikawa S, et al. Enhanced neural activity in response to dynamic facial expressions of emotion: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 2004, 20: 81-91
[6] Bostanov V, Kotchoubey B. Recognition of affective prosody:Continuous wavelet measures of event-related brain potentials to emotional exclamations. Psychophysiology, 2004, 41: 259-268
[7] Borod J C, Haywood C S, Koff E. Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: A review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychology Review, 1997, 7(1): 41-60
[8] Williamson J B, Shenal B V, Rhodes R D, et al. Quantitative EEG diagnostic confirmation of expressive aprosodia. Applied Neuropsychology, 2003, 10(3): 176-181
[9] Gainott. Emotional behavior and hemispheric side of lesion. Cortex, 1972, 8:41-55
[10] Herridge M L, Harrison D W, Mollet G A, et al. Hostility and facial affect recognition: Effects of a cold pressor stressor on accuracy and cardiovascular reactivity. Brain and Cognition, 2004, 55: 564-571
[11] Everhart D E, Carpenter M D, Carmona J E, et al. Adult sex-related P300 differences during the perception of emotional prosody and facial affect. Psychophysiology, 2003, 40(S1): S39
[12] Reuter-Lorenz P A, Givis R P, Moscovitch M. Hemispheric specialization and the perception of emotion: Evidence from right-handers and from inverted and noninverted lefthanders. Neuropsychologia, 1983, 21: 687-692
[13] Adolphs R, Damasio H, Tranel D, et al. Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 1996, 16: 7678-7687
[14] Schwartz G E, Ahern G, Brown S. Lateralized facial muscles response to positive and negative emotional stimuli. Psychophysiology, 1979, 16(6): 561-571
[15] Wager T D, Phan K L, Liberzon I, et al. Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: A meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 2003, 19(3): 513-531
[16] Luria A R. The working brain. New York: Basic Books, 1973
[17] Davidson R J, Ekman P, Saron C D, et al. Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology I. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 58(2): 330-341
[18] Coan J A, Allen J J, Harmon-Jones E. Voluntary facial expression and hemispheric asymmetry over the frontal cortex. Psychophysiology, 2001, 38(6): 912-925
[19] Harmon-Jones E, Allen J J. Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry with approach motivation despite negative affective valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(5): 1310-1316
[20] Buss A H, Perry M. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 63(3): 452-459
[21] Gray J A. Framework on taxonomy of psychiatric disorder// VanGoozen H M, VanDePoll N E, Sergeant J A. Emotions:Essays on emotion theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994, 29-59
[22] Corr P J. Gray′s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 2002, 33(4): 511-532
[23] Harmon-Jones E. Anger and the behavioral approach system. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 35(5): 995-1005
[24] Demaree H A, Everhart D E, Youngstrom E A, et al. Brain lateralization of emotional processing: Historical roots and a future incorporating “Dominance”. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2005, 4 (1): 3-20
[25] Shaver P, Schwartz J, Kirson D, et al. Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52(6): 1061-1086
[26] Youngstrom E A, Frazier T W, Butt Z A. Emotional dominance: Factorial evidence factor and divergent correlations from negative affect. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA, 2001
[27] Bushman B J, Anderson C A. Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review, 2001, 108(1): 273-279
[28] Davidson R J, Marshall J R, Tomarken A J, e al. While a phobic waits: Regional brain electrical and autonomic activity in social phobics during anticipation of public speaking. Biological Psychiatry, 2000, 47(2): 85-95
[29] Liotti M, Tucker D M. Emotion in asymmetric corticolimbic networks//Davidson R J, Hugdahl K. Brain asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1995, 389-423
[30] Hagemann D, Waldstein S R, Thayer J F. Central and autonomic nervous system integration in emotion. Brain and Cognition, 2003, 52(1): 79-87

情绪的脑单侧化研究进展

THE REVIEW OF LATERALIZATION OF EMOTION

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马丽云, 莫文. 自我损耗下积极情绪对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 684-691.
[2]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[3]	鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红. 主动性人格对学习投入的影响：领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 508-514.
[4]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[5]	李永占. 情绪智力在身体自尊与进食障碍倾向间的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 570-576.
[6]	刘芳, 霍瑞, 韩铖铖, 王美沂, 杨海波. 执行功能对个体情绪调节策略使用倾向和调节效果的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 382-389.
[7]	郭丰波, 黄佳珊, 刘腾飞, 谷莉. 社会责任感调节群际替代性排斥中旁观者第三方惩罚[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 397-403.
[8]	李鹏, 张志超, 杨洋, 杨佳奇, 李洪玉. 工作压力对中小学教师职业倦怠的影响：情绪劳动和工作满意度的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 412-418.
[9]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[10]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[11]	王军利, 文彦茹, 林艺, 侯莉敏. 学前儿童情绪表达规则认知发展特征及其影响因素：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 764-770.
[12]	陈兰双, 宋惠敏, 董静, 赵欢, 张镇. 老年大学学员组织融入度和抑郁症状的关系及其机制探索[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 706-713.
[13]	杨伟平, 杨项富, 徐建萍. 跨通道视听觉情绪信息对婴儿图式效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 447-453.
[14]	王欣竹, 邹何辉, 郝娜, 黄瑶, 吴琴, 崔丽莹. 抑制还是补偿？尴尬情绪对初中生合作倾向和行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 549-555.
[15]	陈佩儀, 陈瑜, 杨雪岭. 中庸思维对大学生抑郁症状的影响机制：消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 571-576.