求职者简历作假行为结构及影响因素研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 258-263.

求职者简历作假行为结构及影响因素研究

刘茜, 徐建平, 许诺

北京师范大学心理学院,北京市应用实验心理重点实验室,北京 100875

收稿日期:2012-04-08 出版日期:2013-03-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 徐建平,男,北京师范大学心理学院副教授。E-mail:xujp@bnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:刘茜,女,北京师范大学心理学院硕士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家基础科学人才培养基金（J1103601、J1210048）的资助

A Study of the Structure and Influencing Factors of Job Seeker′s CV Faking Behavior

Liu Qian, Xu Jianping, Xu Nuo

School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing Key Lab for Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing 100875

Received:2012-04-08 Online:2013-03-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 求职者简历作假行为是指求职者在简历投递过程中,为提升进入下一轮选拔几率,在简历中表现出虚假信念或信息的行为。研究通过访谈和问卷调查方法,探讨了求职者简历作假行为的结构,以及大学生求职群体简历作假行为的影响因素与特点。结果表明：（1）求职者的简历作假行为包含迎合招聘企业、篡改个人信息、粉饰关键词句和提升匹配程度四个因素。（2）马基雅维利主义倾向可以预测其简历作假行为。（3）大学生求职者的简历作假行为在其简历投递次数以及简历修改次数上存在差异。

关键词: 作假, 简历作假, 作假行为结构。

Abstract: CV Faking Behavior is defined as the job seeker leaving false information or belief in order to raise the likelihood of being admitted to the next round of selection. Via qualitative research and quantitative research method of psychology, this research discussed the structure of job seeker′s CV faking behavior and its influencing factors in China, based on literature studying, interview, figuring out the questionnaires factor analysis. The results are as follows:(1)Job seeker′s CV faking behavior in China is composed of four factors: Ingratiation, Information changing, Key words modifying and Fitness promotion;(2)Job seekers′ Machiavellianism influenced CV Faking Behavior; (3)The demographic variables like the times of application and the times of CV revised, had significant effects on CV Faking Behavior.

Key words: faking, CV faking behavior, structure of faking behavior.

中图分类号:

B849

刘茜, 徐建平, 许诺. 求职者简历作假行为结构及影响因素研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 258-263.

Liu Qian, Xu Jianping, Xu Nuo. A Study of the Structure and Influencing Factors of Job Seeker′s CV Faking Behavior[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(2): 258-263.

参考文献

1 范肖东.(1999). 马基雅维利主义量表. 见: 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册 (170-171). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社.
2 骆方, 刘红云, 张月.(2010). 应聘情境下作假识别量表的开发. 心理学报, 42 (7), 791-801.
3 Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K.(1996). Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (3), 261-272.
4 Deluga, R. J., & Perry, J. T.(1994). The role of subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-member exchanges. Group & Organization Management, 19 (1), 67-86.
5 DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D.(1985). Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (5), 1191-1203
6 Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Hurtz, G. M.(2003). An assessment of the prevalence,severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Human Performance, 16 (01), 81-106.
7 Fletcher, C.(1990). The relationships between candidate personality, self-presentation strategies, and interviewer assessments in selection interviews: An empirical study. Human Relations, 43 (8), 739-749.
8 Graham, J. H.(1996). Machiavellian project managers: Do they perform better? International Journal of Project Management, 14 (2), 67-74.
9 Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R.(2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (5), 1270-1285.
10 Kleinmann, M., Ingold, P. V., Lievens, F., Jansen, A., Melchers, K. G., & König, C. J.(2011). A different look at why selection procedures work. Organizational Psychology Review, 1 (2), 128-146.
11 Kumar, K., & Beyerlein, M.(1991). Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (5), 619-627.
12 Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A.(2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview: Development and validation of an Interview Faking Behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (6), 1638-1656.
13 Marcus, B.(2006). Relationships between faking, validity, and decision criteria in personnel selection. Psychology Science, 48 (3), 226-246.
14 Motowidlo, S. J., Carter, G. W., Dunnette, M. D., Tippins, N., Werner, S., Burnett, J. R., & Vaughan, M. J.(1992). Studies of the structured behavioral interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (5), 571-587.
15 Mumford, M. D., & Owens, W. A.(1987). Methodology review- principles, procedures, and findings in the application of background data measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11 (1), 1-31.
16 Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M.(2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36 (6), 556-563.
17 Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A.(1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (4), 634-644.
18 Snell, A. F., Sydell, E. J., & Lueke, S. B.(1999). Towards a theory of applicant faking: Integrating studies of deception. Human Resource Management Review, 9 (2), 219-242.

[1]	胡雯, 杨静, 王有智, 王丽. 人格特质测验的情境差异––兼谈职业应聘情境中心理测验作假的识别与控制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 817-822.
[2]	齐亚静,刘惠军. 关系评价对助人行为的影响：自尊的中介和调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 697-701.
[3]	孙颖；张慧；曹小燕. 基于概化理论的作假识别量表编制及其作用[J]. , 2012, 10(6): 473-479.