多范例训练提升儿童隐喻理解能力的干预性研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 675-682.

多范例训练提升儿童隐喻理解能力的干预性研究

毛晓翎^1,2,3,4, 王分分^1,2,3, 曹静^1,2,3, 祝卓宏^1,2,3

1 . 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室(中国科学院心理研究所), 北京 100101;
4. 北京国家会计学院, 北京 101312

收稿日期:2016-04-11 出版日期:2017-09-20 发布日期:2017-12-28
通讯作者: 祝卓宏,E-mail:zhuzh@psych.ac.cn
基金资助:
北京科技计划项目（D151100002315003）

The Effectiveness of Multi-sample Training for Children Aged 4 to 7 by Establishing Relational Frame on Metaphors

MAO Xiaoling^1,2,3,4, WANG Fenfen^1,2,3, CAO Jing^1,2,3, ZHU Zhuohong^1,2,3

1 . Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
3. CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101;
4. Beijing National Accounting Institute, Beijing 101312

Received:2016-04-11 Online:2017-09-20 Published:2017-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在考察多范例训练提高4-7岁儿童隐喻理解能力的有效性。根据关系框架理论，自行编制隐喻故事及隐喻问题，使用多范例训练方法，对56名儿童进行训练，并检验。结果发现：4-7岁儿童隐喻理解能力随年龄增长而提高，各年龄组间对隐喻的理解能力具有显著差异；各实验阶段差异显著；回答正误受到能否复述、语境熟悉程度、词汇理解程度显著影响，语境熟悉程度对隐喻理解的影响力可能比词汇理解程度更大。结论：语境熟悉程度、词汇理解能力等因素影响儿童在隐喻的本体与喻体之间建立联系，而通过多范例训练的方式，帮助儿童辨识其相关性及区别性关系，从而提高对隐喻的理解能力是有效的。并且，可以泛化到未经学习的隐喻推理中。

关键词: 多范例训练, 儿童, 隐喻, 关系框架理论

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of enhancing the ability to comprehend metaphors for children aged 4 to 7 by multi-sample training. 56 children trained by using the multi-sample training and by composing our own metaphor stories and questions according to the Relational Framing Theory are tested. The result shows that the ability to comprehend metaphors for children aged 4 to 7 increases with their age, and there are significant differences between children belonging to each age group in their ability to comprehend metaphors. The effect shows significant difference between each experimental stage. The correctness of the children's answers can be significantly influenced by their retelling ability, familiarity of context, and understanding of vocabularies. Familiarity of context might have a bigger impact on their ability to comprehend metaphors than understanding of vocabularies. The conclusion is that the ability of children to establish the relationship between tenor and vehicle in a metaphor is influenced by factors such as familiarity of context and understanding of vocabularies. Multi-sample training is effective in enhancing children's ability to comprehend metaphor by helping children to distinguish relationships such as correlation and distinctiveness. Multi-sample training can be further applied to reasoning of metaphors not yet learned by children.

Key words: multi-sample training, children, metaphor, Relational Framing Theory

中图分类号:

B844.1

毛晓翎, 王分分, 曹静, 祝卓宏. 多范例训练提升儿童隐喻理解能力的干预性研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 675-682.

MAO Xiaoling, WANG Fenfen, CAO Jing, ZHU Zhuohong. The Effectiveness of Multi-sample Training for Children Aged 4 to 7 by Establishing Relational Frame on Metaphors[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(5): 675-682.

参考文献

白丽芳. (2004). 儿童隐喻性思维的特点及其发展. 外语与外语教学, (4), 53-57.
刘正光, 米小玲. (2008). 学龄前儿童隐喻理解能力研究. 四川外语学院学报, 24(6), 40-44.
皮亚杰. (1970). 发生认识论原理. 北京: 商务印书馆.
束定芳. (1997). 理查兹隐喻理论. 外语研究, (3), 25-28.
束定芳. (2000). 隐喻学研究. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
田苗. (2013). 认知视角下隐喻能力提升的影响因素分析. 学术交流, (7), 161-163.
王勃然. (2005). 从认知角度看隐喻的起源、本质和功能. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 7(2), 148-150.
王分分, 祝卓宏. (2015). 建构自闭症谱系障碍儿童隐喻推理能力习得模式的探索. 中国心理学会第四届临床与咨询心理学注册工作委员会大会暨中国心理学会临床与咨询心理学分会2015年学术会议, 北京.
王寅, 李宏. (2004). 语言能力、交际能力、隐喻能力“三合一”教学观——当代隐喻认知理论在外语教学中的应用. 四川外语学院学报, 20(6), 140-143.
王志红. (2005). 通感隐喻的认知阐释. 修辞学习, (3), 59-61.
张鹭. (2008). 隐喻的理解与语境—以《红楼梦》隐喻为例. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 35(5), 142-144.
邹梦雨. (2012). 2-6岁儿童隐喻理解能力发展研究 (硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
Asch, S., & Nerlove, H. (1960). The development of double function terms in children: An exploratory study. New York: International University Press.
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press.
Garner, R. (2005). Humor, analogy, and metaphor: H. A. M. it up in teaching. Radical Pedagogy, 6(2). Retrieved February 1, 2016, from http://www.radicalpedagogy.org/radicalpedagogy/Humor,_Analogy,_and_Metaphor__H.A.M._it_up_in_Teaching.html
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: New York Basic Books.
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268-294.
Persicke, A., Tarbox, J., Ranick, J., & St. Clair, M. (2012). Establishing metaphorical reasoning in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 913-920.
Verschueren, J. (2000). Understanding pragmatics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things: The emergence of metaphoric language. Journal of Child Language, 6(3), 469-491.
Winner, E., McCarthy, M., & Gardner, H. (1980). The ontogenesis of metaphor. In R. P. Honeck & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cognition and figurative language. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[1]	赵金霞, 公绪霞. 母子依恋与农村儿童焦虑的关系：HPA轴活动的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 665-671.
[2]	余益兵, 于家伟, 李艳如, 杜宜展. 农村留守儿童领悟家庭支持、朋友支持与抑郁的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 472-478.
[3]	谭德琴, 谢瑞波, 丁菀, 吴伟, 宋省成, 李伟健. 亲子依恋和师生关系对留守儿童内化问题的影响：同伴依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 339-345.
[4]	李晓玫, 姜英杰, 于明阳, 袁媛, 刘芳芳. 留守儿童心理虐待与攻击行为：心理弹性和人际敏感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 353-360.
[5]	于腾旭, 刘文, 刘方. 心理虐待与儿童快感缺失的关系：认知重评的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 361-367.
[6]	赵思怡, 李莹, 王悦. 情绪效价−空间动作隐喻联结对成人和儿童外语情绪词学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 153-159.
[7]	陆芳, 付淑英. 农村儿童社会性发展问卷的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 248-254.
[8]	白慧慧, 王雨晴, 孙婉靖. 留守儿童心理韧性的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 261-267.
[9]	袁博, 廖苏霞, 郭俏俏, 高奇扬, 陈思宇. 流动儿童的社会善念水平及其提升[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 268-273.
[10]	张环, 左天然, 姜维, 裴铃茹, 吴瑕. 教师的语言形式对儿童语言理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 59-64.
[11]	曾思瑶, 王振宏. 中文版父母报告高敏感儿童量表的修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 101-107.
[12]	王军利, 文彦茹, 林艺, 侯莉敏. 学前儿童情绪表达规则认知发展特征及其影响因素：一项追踪研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 764-770.
[13]	黄鹤, 王小英, 吕博. 家庭累积风险与流动学前儿童的问题行为：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 779-785.
[14]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[15]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.