样例启动对中学生创造性科学问题提出能力的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 750-755.

样例启动对中学生创造性科学问题提出能力的影响

韩琴¹, 强瑞超^2,3, 秦亚平¹

1. 山西师范大学教育科学学院, 临汾 041004;
2. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
3. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079

收稿日期:2015-11-21 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-12-28
通讯作者: 韩琴,E-mail:hbiner@126.com
基金资助:
山西基础教育质量提升协同创新中心重点课题（XTB1603），山西省高等学校教学改革创新项目（J2017051），山西省教育科学规划课题（GH-16031），山西省高等学校创新人才支持计划和教育部人文社科青年基金项目（13YC190006）

The Influence of Example Priming in Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability of Middle School Students

HAN Qin¹, QIANG Ruichao^2,3, QIN Yaping¹

1. School of Education Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004;
2. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
3. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079

Received:2015-11-21 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取1404名中学生，采用混合实验设计，通过呈现不同创造性水平样例，探索不同样例启动方式对中学生创造性科学问题提出能力的影响。结果表明：（1）封闭式题目水平上，高创造性样例对中学生创造性科学问题提出能力有促进作用，低创造性样例则有明显抑制作用；开放式题目水平上，高创造性样例与低创造性样例对创造性科学问题提出能力均有抑制作用；（2）低创造性样例对开放式题目的抑制作用大于对封闭式题目的抑制作用。

关键词: 样例启动, 创造性科学问题提出能力, 开放式题目, 封闭式题目

Abstract: Example priming is an effective method for learning in well-structured fields such as mathematics or physics, as well as in less-structured fields like creativity. Examples focus learner's attention on information for schema construction and avoid extensive search processes. Meanwhile, they prove a central characteristic of experts' problem solving. Therefore, learning from examples imposes lower levels of cognitive load, which makes more cognitive resources free for the demanding process of creative scientific problem finding. The study selected 1404 middle school students randomly from 4 urban schools and 2 rural schools. A mixed experiment design of the 3(example priming format: high creative examples/low creative examples/no examples)×2(question style: opened question/closed question) model was used in the study, which applied Consensual Assessment Technique, Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Simple Effect Analysis to explore the influence of example priming in Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability (CSPF) of middle school students. The results indicated that: 1) High creative examples could promote CSPF in closed question, while low creative examples affected it; both high and low creative examples restrained CSPF in opened question; 2) Low creative examples had greater inhibiting impact on opened question than on the closed question.

Key words: example priming, creative scientific problem finding ability, opened question, closed question

中图分类号:

B844.2

韩琴, 强瑞超, 秦亚平. 样例启动对中学生创造性科学问题提出能力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 750-755.

HAN Qin, QIANG Ruichao, QIN Yaping. The Influence of Example Priming in Creative Scientific Problem Finding Ability of Middle School Students[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 750-755.

参考文献

韩琴, 胡卫平, 贾小娟. (2013). 同伴互动小组结构对小学生创造性问题提出的影响. 心理科学, 36(2), 417-423.
胡卫平, 王兴起. (2010). 情绪对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响. 心理科学, 33(3), 608-611.
刘春晖, 林崇德. (2015). 个体变量、材料变量对大学生创造性问题提出能力的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 513-521.
刘菊, 钟绍春, 解月光. (2012). 物理实验中开放性问题教学的几点思考. 课程·教材·教法, 32(8), 112-118.
宋晓辉, 施建农. (2005). 创造力测量手段——同感评估技术(CAT)?简介. 心理科学进展, 13(6), 739-744.
王博韬. (2013). 大脑半球互动水平对创造性科学问题提出能力的影响 (硕士学位论文). 山西师范大学.
吴先强, 韦斯林. (2009). 国外认知负荷理论与有效教学的研究进展及启示. 全球教育展望, 38(2), 28-31, 10.
徐希铮, 张景焕, 刘桂荣, 李鹰. (2012). 奖励对创造力的影响及其机制. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1419-1425.
衣新发, 胡卫平. (2013). 科学创造力与艺术创造力: 启动效应及领域影响. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 22-30.
许德志, 张奇. (2011). 碳氢共价键结构式正误样例组合的学习效果. 心理科学, 34(2), 386-392.
张景焕, 刘桂荣, 师玮玮, 付秀君. (2011). 动机的激发与小学生创造思维的关系: 自主性动机的中介作用. 心理学报, 43(10), 1138-1150.
张奇, 蔡晨. (2015). 规则样例学习的实验研究和理论探索. 心理与行为研究, 13(5), 614-620.
张勇, 龙立荣. (2013). 绩效薪酬对雇员创造力的影响: 人—工作匹配和创造力自我效能的作用. 心理学报, 45(3), 363-376.
周爱保, 马小凤, 李晶, 崔丹. (2013). 提取练习在记忆保持与迁移中的优势效应:基于认知负荷理论的解释. 心理学报, 45(8), 849-859.
Adams, D. M., McLaren, B. M., Durkin, K., Mayer, R. E., Rittle-Johnson, B., Isotani, S., & van Velsen, M. (2014). Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 401-411.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181-214.
Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22, 206-214.
Eisenberger, R., & Aselage, J. (2009). Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: Positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 95-117.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112-1142.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Learning and Instruction, 17, 612-634.
Hu, W. P., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X. Q., & Adey, P. (2010). Creative scientific problem finding and its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 46-52.
Huang, T. H., Liu, Y. C., & Shiu, C. Y. (2008). Construction of an online learning system for decimal numbers through the use of cognitive conflict strategy. Computers & Education, 50, 61-76.
Nievelstein, F., van Gog, T., van Dijck, G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2013). The worked example and expertise reversal effect in less structured tasks: Learning to reason about legal cases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 118-125.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Paas, F., & van Gog, T. (2006). Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 16, 87-91.
Rourke, A., & Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognise designers' styles. Learning and Instruction, 19, 185-199.
Stark, R., Kopp, V., & Fischer, M. R. (2011). Case-based learning with worked examples in complex domains: Two experimental studies in undergraduate medical education. Learning and Instruction, 21, 22-33.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59-89.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
VanLehn, K. (1999). Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: An evaluation of CASCADE. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 71-125.