文化差异与融合：蒙古族大学生场景知觉的眼动研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 751-756.

文化差异与融合：蒙古族大学生场景知觉的眼动研究

何虎¹, 李杰^1,2, 侯友², 包呼格吉乐图³, 田颖¹, 刘敏¹

1. 内蒙古师范大学教育科学学院, 呼和浩特 010022;
2. 内蒙古自治区心理学重点实验室, 呼和浩特 010022;
3. 内蒙古师范大学体育学院, 呼和浩特 010022

收稿日期:2017-11-13 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-12-27
通讯作者: 李杰,E-mail:healthlj2004@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31460250）、内蒙古自治区高等学校“青年科技英才支持计划A类”（NJYT-18-A03）、内蒙古师范大学研究生创新基金（CXJJB17003）项目

Culturalist Versus Polyculturalist: Evidence From Mongolian College Students' Scene-perception by Eye-movement Technology

HE Hu¹, LI Jie^1,2, HOU You², BAO Hugjilt³, TIAN Ying¹, LIU Min¹

1. Education Science College, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of Psychology, Hohhot 010022, China;
3. School of Physical Education, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China

Received:2017-11-13 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2018-12-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用眼动技术对蒙古国蒙古族大学生、中国内蒙古蒙古族大学生和汉族大学生的场景知觉特点进行对比，旨在从文化差异与文化融合的角度探讨文化对认知的作用。结果发现，内蒙古蒙古族和汉族大学生的眼动指标无显著差异，均重视背景与前景物体的关系，而蒙古国大学生更加注意对前景物体的知觉，这与汉族和内蒙古蒙古族大学显著不同。文化差异影响个体的认知，文化融合会对认知产生建构作用，这种作用具有动态性。

关键词: 场景知觉, 蒙古族, 民族建构论, 文化融合

Abstract: Using Eye-movement technology, the present study aim to investigate the feature of Han and Mongolian college students'cognitive process in the Scene-perception. The study finds that Inner Mongolian and Han college students are more concerned with the context, while Outer Mongolian college students are more focused on the salient objects. It suggests that both the cultural difference and blending can influence individual's cognitive processes. In summary, our study support that the social constructionist theory of ethnicity and polycultural psychology.

Key words: scene-perception, Mongolian, social constructionist theory of ethnicity, polycultural

中图分类号:

B849

何虎, 李杰, 侯友, 包呼格吉乐图, 田颖, 刘敏. 文化差异与融合：蒙古族大学生场景知觉的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 751-756.

HE Hu, LI Jie, HOU You, BAO Hugjilt, TIAN Ying, LIU Min. Culturalist Versus Polyculturalist: Evidence From Mongolian College Students' Scene-perception by Eye-movement Technology[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(6): 751-756.

参考文献

七十三, 何虎, 李杰, 田颖, 刘兴宇, 张瑞芳. (2017). 蒙、汉大学生的自我构念对知觉加工的影响. 心理科学, 40(3), 645-650
高承海, 万明钢. (2013). 民族本质论对民族认同和刻板印象的影响. 心理学报, 45(2), 231-242
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 12629-12633, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102.
Crisp, R. J., & Meleady, R (2012). Adapting to a multicultural future. Science, 336(6083), 853-855, doi: 10.1126/science.1219009.
Han, S. H., & Ma, Y (2014). Cultural differences in human brain activity: A quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 99, 293-300, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.062.
Han, S. H., & Ma, Y (2015). A culture-behavior-brain loop model of human development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 666-676, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.010.
Han, S. H., & Northoff, G (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 646-654, doi: 10.1038/nrn2456.
Hong, Y. Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Benet-Martínez, V (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709.
Kim, H. E., Poth, N., Reuter, K., & Sytsma, J. (2016). Where is your pain? A Cross-cultural Comparison of the Concept of Pain in Americans and South Korea. [Preprint]
Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. K (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419-449, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145357.
Kuwabara, M., & Smith, L. B (2016). Cultural differences in visual object recognition in 3-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 22-38, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.006.
Imai, M., Kanero, J., & Masuda, T (2016). The relation between language, culture, and thought. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 70-77, doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.011.
Liu, Z. Z., Cheng, M. X., Peng, K. P., & Zhang, D (2015). Self-construal priming selectively modulates the scope of visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1508.
Lin, Z. C., Lin, Y., & Han, S. H (2008). Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception. Biological Psychology, 77(1), 93-97, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.002.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.922.
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 631-659, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015001.
Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467-473, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004.
No, S., Hong, Y. Y., Liao, H. Y., Lee, K., Wood, D., & Chao, M. M (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans' responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 95(4), 991-1004.
Or, C. C. F., Peterson, M. F., & Eckstein, M. P (2015). Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures. Journal of Vision, 15(13), 12, doi: 10.1167/15.13.12.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K (2017). Integrating brain, cognition and culture. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 1, 3-15, doi: 10.1007/s41809-017-0001-7.
Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. M (2009). Eye movements when looking at unusual/weird scenes: Are there cultural differences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 254-259, doi: 10.1037/a0013508.
Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., & Kitayama, S (2014). Large-scale psychological differences within china explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science, 344(6184), 603-608, doi: 10.1126/science.1246850.
Uskul, A. K., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(25), 8552-8556, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803874105.
Yamada, A. M., & Singelis, T. M (1999). Biculturalism and self-construal. International. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 697-709, doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00016-4.
Zhang, Y. L., & Mittal, V (2007). The attractiveness of enriched and impoverished options: Culture, self-construal, and regulatory focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 588-598, doi: 10.1177/0146167206296954.
Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. H (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1310-1316, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047.