不同熟练程度藏汉双语者言语理解中的语码切换及其代价

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 744-750.

不同熟练程度藏汉双语者言语理解中的语码切换及其代价

高蕾^1,2, 高晓雷², 白学军³, 陈梅香⁴, 郭志英⁵

1. 天津大学管理与经济学部, 天津 300072;
2. 西藏大学高原脑科学研究中心, 拉萨 850000;
3. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074;
4. 厦门大学心理咨询与教育中心, 厦门 361005;
5. 天津市教育科学研究院, 天津 300191

收稿日期:2017-05-17 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-12-27
通讯作者: 高晓雷,E-mail:gaoxiaolei2010@163.com;白学军,E-mail:bxuejun@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31860280）、2016年西藏自治区高校青年教师创新支持计划项目（QCR2016-10）和西藏大学培育基金项目（ZDCZJH18-03）

Language Switching and Switching Cost in Language Comprehension of Tibetan-Chinese Bilinguals With Different Proficiency Levels

GAO Lei^1,2, GAO Xiaolei², BAI Xuejun³, CHEN Meixiang⁴, GUO Zhiying⁵

1. Department of management and economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072;
2. Plateau Brain Science Research Center, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000;
3. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
4. Counseling and Education Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005;
5. Tianjin Academy of Educational Science, Tianjin 300191

Received:2017-05-17 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2018-12-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以母语为藏语，第二语言为汉语的熟练和非熟练藏汉双语者为被试，采用词汇判断任务，在无切换、预期切换和无预期切换三种条件下，考察藏汉两种语言之间的语码切换及其切换代价。结果表明：（1）在三种条件下，熟练和非熟练藏汉双语者对汉语词的反应时均显著短于对藏语词的反应时，汉语词的错误率也显著低于藏语词；（2）切换条件下的反应速度显著慢于无切换条件，切换条件下的错误率显著高于无切换条件，存在显著的切换代价；（3）熟练藏汉双语者对汉语词的反应时显著短于非熟练藏汉双语者，熟练藏汉双语者对汉语词反应的错误率也显著低于非熟练藏汉双语者。本研究表明，藏汉双语语码切换过程中存在切换代价，支持抑制说；熟练藏汉双语者语码切换代价更小。

关键词: 藏语, 汉语, 语码切换, 切换代价

Abstract: In this study, we chose Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals to perform the word recognition task. For these bilinguals, Tibetan is their mother tongue and Chinese is their second language. According to the level of Chinese of the subjects, we divided them into two groups, that is, the proficient and nonproficient bilinguals. In this experiment, we set up three conditions, namely, the no switching, expected switching, and no expected switching conditions. The aim of this study is to determine the essentials of language switching and switching costs between Tibetan and Chinese. The results were as follows:1) under the three conditions, the reaction times of Chinese words of proficient and nonproficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals were significantly shorter than that of Tibetan words, while the error rate of Chinese words was significantly lower than that of Tibetan words. 2) Compared switching condition with no switching condition, the reaction speed of the former was slower, the error rate of the former was higher, they all reached a significant level. The switching costs were observed. 3) Compared proficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals with nonproficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals, the reaction times of Chinese of the former were shorter, the error rate of the former was lower, they all reached a significant level. For conclusion, in the process of Tibetan-Chinese bilingual's language switching, there was switching cost. The findings support the hypothesis of inhibition that the switching cost of proficient Tibetan-Chinese bilinguals was smaller.

Key words: Tibetan, Chinese, language switching, switching costs

中图分类号:

B842.6

高蕾, 高晓雷, 白学军, 陈梅香, 郭志英. 不同熟练程度藏汉双语者言语理解中的语码切换及其代价[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 744-750.

GAO Lei, GAO Xiaolei, BAI Xuejun, CHEN Meixiang, GUO Zhiying. Language Switching and Switching Cost in Language Comprehension of Tibetan-Chinese Bilinguals With Different Proficiency Levels[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(6): 744-750.

参考文献

白学军, 高晓雷, 高蕾, 王永胜. (2017). 藏语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理学报, 49(5), 569-576
崔占玲, 张积家. (2010). 汉-英双语者言语理解中语码切换的机制——来自亚词汇水平的证据. 心理学报, 42(2), 173-184
崔占玲, 张积家, 韩淼. (2007). 汉-英和藏-汉-英双语者中、英文语码切换及代价研究. 应用心理学, 13(2), 160-167, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2007.02.011
崔占玲, 张积家, 鲁忠义. (2009). 语码切换及代价的研究及进展. 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 32(4), 102-107
高晓雷, 王永胜, 郭志英, 张慢慢, 白学军. (2015). 藏-汉双语者语义与词汇表征特点研究. 心理与行为研究, 13(6), 737-743, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2015.06.003
胡笑羽, 白学军. (2008). 双语控制的神经基础及其对第二语言教学的启示. 心理与行为研究, 6(1), 70-74, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2008.01.013
李波. (2012). 教育优先发展背景下的西藏双语教育策略研究. 中国藏学, (2), 213-216
吕勇, 许贵芳, 沈德立. (2008). 汉英语言内及语言间重复启动效应的ERP研究. 心理与行为研究, 6(2), 81-88, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2008.02.001
吕璀璀. (2016). 英语课堂中教师语码转换的社会心理动机研究. 教学与管理: 理论版, (8), 86-89
马恒芬, 何立媛. (2014). 语言理解中的语码切换研究. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 462-467
马恒芬, 王春梅, 耿峰. (2014). 汉-英双语语码切换代价实证研究. 当代外语研究, (5), 43-46
祁志强, 彭聃龄, 丁国盛. (2010). 不可预期条件下汉英双语者的语言切换研究. 心理科学, 33(5), 1051-1053
祁志强, 彭聘龄, 许翔杰, 柳恒超. (2009). 汉英双语者语言产生与理解过程中的切换研究. 心理科学, 32(2), 356-359
王敬欣, 贾丽萍, 何立媛, 张阔. (2014). 汉-英双语者图片命名任务中的语码切换代价. 心理学探新, 34(2), 147-151, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2014.02.009
王悦, 张积家. (2013). 熟练汉-英双语者在短语理解中的语码切换机制. 外语研究, (6), 51-55, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7242.2013.06.009
伍丽梅, 伍国华, 陈卓铭. (2017). 双语者言语产生中语码切换代价——从孤立词汇到句子语境. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 37-48
张积家, 崔占玲. (2008). 藏-汉-英双语者字词识别中的语码切换及其代价. 心理学报, 40(2), 136-147
张积家, 王悦. (2012). 熟练汉-英双语者的语码切换机制——来自短语水平的证据. 心理学报, 44(2), 166-178
张阔, 王敬欣. (2005). 汉-英并列双语者图片命名的重复启动效应. 心理与行为研究, 3(1), 30-34
张玉晶, 买合甫来提·坎吉, 阻木然提古丽·然木吐拉. (2015). 不同水平五年级维吾尔族学生母语阅读知觉广度. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 703-709
Bruin, A. M. T. D., Roelofs, A. P. A., Dijkstra, A. F. J., & Fitzpatrick, I (2014). Domain-general inhibition areas of the brain are involved in language switching: FMRI evidence from trilingual speakers. Neuroimage, 90(8), 348-359.
Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z (2013). Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 568-585, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.792822.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. Plos One, 5(6), e10729, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
Caramazza, A., & Brones, I (1980). Semantic classification by bilinguals. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 34(1), 77-81, doi: 10.1037/h0081016.
Declerck, M., & Philipp, A. M (2015). A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1630-1645.
Fink, A., & Goldrick, M (2015). Pervasive benefits of preparation in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 808-814.
Francis, W. S (1999). Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: Semantic Representation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 193-222, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.193.
Grainger, J., & Beauvillain, C (1987). Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(2), 295-319, doi: 10.1080/14640748708401788.
Grosjean, F (1992). Another view of bilingualism. Advances in Psychology, 83, 51-62, doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61487-9.
Gross, M., & Kaushanskaya, M (2015). Voluntary language switching in English-Spanish bilingual children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(8), 992-1013, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1074242.
Jared, D., & Kroll, J. F (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44(1), 2-31, doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2747.
Kolers, P. A (1966). Interlingual facilitation of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(3), 314-319, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80037-3.
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A (1999). Bilingual language-switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, (40), 25-40.
Nas, G (1983). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence for a cooperation between visual and sound based codes during access to a common lexical store. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(5), 526-534, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90319-5.
Orfanidou, E., & Sumner, P (2005). Language switching and the effects of orthographic specificity and response repetition. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 355-369.
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2016). Syntactic interference in bilingual naming during language switching. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), Cognitive control and consequences of multilingualism (pp. 239-270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Thomas, M. S. C., & Allport, A (2000). Language switching costs in bilingual visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(1), 44-66, doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2700.

[1]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[2]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.
[3]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[4]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[5]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[6]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 李海燕, 白学军, 高蕾. 藏语母语者汉语词汇识别的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 45-52.
[7]	杨宇, 马杰, 谭珂, 张明哲, 白学军. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的快速命名缺陷[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 652-661.
[8]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[9]	季雨竹, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉大细胞-背侧通路功能[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 577-582.
[10]	陈琳, 徐贵平, 翁斐斐. 首、尾语素频率对中级印尼汉语学习者复合词识别的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 145-149.
[11]	徐灿, 杨小虎, 汪玉霞, 张辉, 丁红卫, 刘畅. 语音型噪音对二语者汉语元音声调感知的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 22-30.
[12]	王永胜, 陈茗静, 赵冰洁, 李馨, 白宇鸽. 副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 756-765.
[13]	伍秋萍, 郑佩芸, 刘相辉. 3-12岁儿童对汉语声、韵、调的意识与早期阅读的关系：基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 643-653.
[14]	张颖颖, 于方静, 周治金, 陈宝国. 汉语时间-空间隐喻加工垂直偏向性的稳固性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 446-462.
[15]	吕行, 施家炜. 汉语搭配信息对词汇识别的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 453-468.